Skip to main content

Standalone Tactics Using OpenTheory

  • Conference paper
Book cover Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7406))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Proof tools in interactive theorem provers are usually developed within and tied to a specific system, which leads to a duplication of effort to make the functionality available in different systems. Many verification projects would benefit from access to proof tools developed in other systems. Using OpenTheory as a language for communicating between systems, we show how to turn a proof tool implemented for one system into a standalone tactic available to many systems via the internet. This enables, for example, LCF-style proof reconstruction efforts to be shared by users of different interactive theorem provers and removes the need for each user to install the external tool being integrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Slind, K., Norrish, M.: A brief overview of HOL4. In: [18], pp. 28–32

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison, J.: HOL Light: An Overview. In: Berghofer, S., Nipkow, T., Urban, C., Wenzel, M. (eds.) TPHOLs 2009. LNCS, vol. 5674, pp. 60–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Arthan, R.: ProofPower manuals (2004), http://lemma-one.com/ProofPower

  4. Wenzel, M., Paulson, L.C., Nipkow, T.: The Isabelle framework. In: [18], pp. 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, R., Weber, T.: Validating QBF validity in HOL4. In: [19], pp. 168–183

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kunčar, O.: Proving valid quantified boolean formulas in HOL Light. In: [19], pp. 184–199

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weber, T., Amjad, H.: Efficiently checking propositional refutations in HOL theorem provers. Journal of Applied Logic 7(1), 26–40 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Blanchette, J.C., Bulwahn, L., Nipkow, T.: Automatic Proof and Disproof in Isabelle/HOL. In: Tinelli, C., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) FroCos 2011. LNCS, vol. 6989, pp. 12–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurd, J.: First-order proof tactics in higher-order logic theorem provers. In: Archer, M., Vito, B.D., Muñoz, C. (eds.) STRATA 2003, Number NASA/CP-2003-212448 in NASA Technical Reports, pp. 56–68 (September 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slind, K.: Reasoning about Terminating Functional Programs. PhD thesis, Technischen Universität München (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krauss, A.: Partial and nested recursive function definitions in higher-order logic. J. Autom. Reasoning 44(4), 303–336 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hurd, J.: The OpenTheory Standard Theory Library. In: Bobaru, M., Havelund, K., Holzmann, G.J., Joshi, R. (eds.) NFM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6617, pp. 177–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hurd, J.: OpenTheory: Package management for higher order logic theories. In: Reis, G.D., Théry, L. (eds.) PLMMS, pp. 31–37. ACM (August 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dennis, L.A., Collins, G., Norrish, M., Boulton, R.J., Slind, K., Robinson, G., Gordon, M., Melham, T.: The PROSPER Toolkit. In: Graf, S. (ed.) TACAS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1785, pp. 78–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Sutcliffe, G.: The TPTP World – Infrastructure for Automated Reasoning. In: Clarke, E.M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-16 2010. LNCS, vol. 6355, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rushby, J.: An Evidential Tool Bus. In: Lau, K.-K., Banach, R. (eds.) ICFEM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3785, p. 36. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Zimmer, J., Autexier, S.: The MathServe System for Semantic Web Reasoning Services. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.) IJCAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4130, pp. 140–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohamed, O.A., Muñoz, C., Tahar, S. (eds.): TPHOLs 2008. LNCS, vol. 5170. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. van Eekelen, M., Geuvers, H., Schmaltz, J., Wiedijk, F. (eds.): ITP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6898. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kumar, R., Hurd, J. (2012). Standalone Tactics Using OpenTheory. In: Beringer, L., Felty, A. (eds) Interactive Theorem Proving. ITP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7406. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32347-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32347-8_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32346-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32347-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics