Advertisement

PowerChalk: An Adaptive e-Learning Application

  • Dan-El Neil Vila Rosado
  • Margarita Esponda-Argüero
  • Raúl Rojas
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 183)

Abstract

This chapter presents a new interactive e-learning application called PowerChalk. PowerChalk has arisen as the result from the analysis of the evolution of Information Systems Design Theory for E-Learning; it was designed to resolve an important limitation of current design methods and e-learning systems: adaptability. Modular programming is the design technique used in PowerChalk to improve human computer interaction with the management of different types of data in order to have positive effect on both learning score and learning satisfaction. PowerChalk works like a Transaction Processing System in order to support collaboration, communication, creativity and learning through a collection of organized modules. The characteristics of PowerChalk facilitate developing of competencies for using multimedia technologies in any learning session, taking into account the teacher and student perspective. The goal of PowerChalk is to provide a robust, reliable, usable and sustainable multimedia technology for collaborative learning.

Keywords

Gesture Recognition Learning Session Handwriting Recognition Design Science Research Collaboration Module 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dick, W., Carey, L., Carey, J.O.: The Systematic Design of Instruction, 6th edn., pp. 1–12. Allyn & Bacon (2005) ISBN 0205412742Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Twiner, A., Coffin, C., Littleton, K., Whitelock, D.: Multimodality, orchestration and participation in the context of classroom use of the interactive whiteboard: a discussion. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19(2), 211–223 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norman, D.: Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anonymous: Mixed skies ahead: What happened to e-learning and why. The Learning Alliance for Higher Education. Change, March-April (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis, R.C., et al.: In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors Incomputing Systems (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lanuza, A.T., et al.: REDALYC: Magazine Computación y Sistemas 12(2), 183–191 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, R.C., Colwell, B., et al.: K-sketch: A “kinetic” Sketch Pad for Novice Animators (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guimbretiere, F.: Computer Human Interactions Letter, vol. 5(2), pp. 51–60. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Jantz, K., Friedland, G., Rojas, R.: Ubiquitous Pointing and Drawing. International Journal on Emerging Technologies for Learning, iJET (2007) ISSN: 1863-0383Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Jones, D., Gregor, S.: The formulation of an Information Systems Design Theory for E-Learning. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boudreau, T., Tulach, J., Wielenga, G.: Rich Client Programming, Plugging into the NetBeans Platform. Prentice Hall (2006) ISBN: 0-13-235480Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gamma, et al.: Design patterns: Elements of reusable object oriented software. Addison-Wesley professional computer series (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wobbrock, J.O., Wilson, A.D., Yang, L.: Gestures without libraries, toolkits or training: A $1 recognizer for user interface prototypes. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposyum on User Interface Software and Technology (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anthoy, L., Wobbrock, J.O.: A lightweight multistroke recognizer for user interface prototypes. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bederson, B., Grosjean, J., Meyer, J.: Toolkit Design for Interactive StructuredGraphics. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan-El Neil Vila Rosado
    • 1
  • Margarita Esponda-Argüero
    • 1
  • Raúl Rojas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations