Abstract
The concept of ‘digital natives’, based on assumptions of high technology literacy of the current generation of students, has triggered extensive discussion and debate in relation to technology use in higher education. Whilst several previous studies have demonstrated that generational views of technology literacy and engagement are not useful to the planning of future teaching and learning developments in higher education (Helsper and Eynon 2009; Kennedy et al. 2008; Bennett and Maton 2010), the digital natives discussion has eventually led to research offering a greater insight into the reality of students’ engagement with technology. From the non-empirical foundations of the digital natives concept through initial quantitative studies and now towards new in-depth qualitative studies, a greater understanding is being developed of the diversity that exists around students’ adopt and use of technology. This chapter reports on a study which aims to further the understanding of the motivations, attitudes and practices of young people in relation to technology. Eight student case studies are presented which provide an in-depth exploration of the stories behind students’ choices and uses of technology across the contexts of their everyday life and academic study.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Barnes K, Marateo RC, Ferris SP (2007) Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate 3(4). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=382. Accessed 1 April 2007
Bennett S, Maton K (2010) Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. J Comput Assist Learn 26(5):321–331
Bennett S, Maton K (2011) Intellectual field or faith-based religion: moving on from the idea of ‘digital natives’. In: Thomas M (ed) Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies. Routledge, New York, pp 169–185
Benson DE, Makolichick J (2007) Conceptions of self and the use of digital technologies in a learning environment. Education 127(4):498–510
Carroll J, Howard S, Vetere F, Peck J, Murphy J (2002) Just want do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-35), Maui, Hawaii, Jan 2002
Caruso JB, Kvavik RB (2005) ECAR study of students and information technology, 2005: convenience, connection, control, and learning roadmap. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. http://connect.educause.edu/library/abstract/ECARStudyofStudentsa/37610. Accessed 31 Dec 2011
Corrin L, Lockyer L, Bennett SJ (2010) Technological diversity: an investigation of students’ technology use in everyday life and academic study. Learn Media Technol 35(4):387–401
Czerniewicz L, Brown C (2010) Born into the digital age in the south of Africa: the reconfiguration of the ‘digital citizen’. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on networked learning 2010. Lancaster University, Aalborg, pp 859–65
Dede C (2005) Planning for neomillennial learning styles. EDUCAUSE Q 28(1):7–12
Garcia P, Qin J (2007) Identifying the generation gap in higher education. Innovate 3(4). http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=379. Accessed 5 April 2007
Helsper E, Eynon R (2009) Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educ Res J 36(3):503–520
Jones C, Healing G (2010) Net generation students: agency and choice and the new technologies. J Comput Assist Learn 26:344–356
Jones C, Ramanau R, Cross S, Healing G (2010) Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Comput Educ 54(3):722–732
Judd T, Kennedy G (2010) A five-year study of on-campus Internet use by undergraduate biomedical students. Comput Educ 55(4):1564–1571
Kennedy G, Krause K, Gray K, Judd T, Bennett S, Maton K, Dalgarno B, Bishop A (2006) Questioning the net generation: a collaborative project in Australian higher education. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual ascilite conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology? Sydney University Press, Sydney, pp 413–417
Kennedy G, Dalgarno B, Gray K, Judd T, Waycott J, Bennett S, Maton K, Krause K, Bishop A, Chang R, Churchward A (2007) The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: preliminary findings from a large cross-institutional study. In: Atkinson R, McBeath C, Soong A, Cheers C (eds) Providing choices for learners and learning: proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers In Learning In Tertiary Education. ASCILITE, Singapore, pp 517–525
Kennedy G, Judd TS, Churchward A, Gray K (2008) First year students’ experiences with technology: are they really digital natives? Australas J Educ Technol 24(1):108–22
Kirkwood A, Price L (2005) Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Stud High Educ 30(3):257–274
Margaryan A, Littlejohn A, Vojt G (2011) Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Comput Educ 56(2):429–440
McWilliam EL (2002) Against professional development. Educ Philos Theory 34(3):289–300
Oblinger D, Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT: first steps toward understanding the net generation. In: Educating the net generation, EDUCAUSE, pp 2.1–2.20
Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5):1–6
Prensky M (2004) The emerging online life of the digital native: what they do differently because of technology, and how they do it. http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/default.asp. Accessed 13 May 2007
Ryberg T, Dirckinck-Holmfeld L, Jones C (2010) Catering to the needs of the “digital natives” or educating the “net generation”? In: Lee MJW, McLoughlin C (eds) Web 2.0-based e-learning: applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 301–318
Salaway G, Caruso JB (2008) The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2008. Educause Center for Applied Research. Educause, Boulder. http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/TheECARStudyofUndergraduateStu/163283. Accessed 12 July 2011
Sanchez J, Salinas A, Contrereas D, Meyer E (2011) Does the new digital generation of learners exist? A Qualitative Study. British J Educ Technol 42(4):543–556
Tapscott D (1998) Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill, New York
Turkle S (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Corrin, L., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L. (2013). Digital Natives: Exploring the Diversity of Young People’s Experience with Technology. In: Huang, R., Kinshuk, Spector, J.M. (eds) Reshaping Learning. New Frontiers of Educational Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32301-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32301-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32300-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32301-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)