Paradigm Shifts in E-Learning: From Web-Based Learning to Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning

Part of the New Frontiers of Educational Research book series (NFER)

Abstract

Although digital learning, such as web-based learning and computer-assisted learning, has been recognized as being an effective learning channel that provides rich and diverse content, educators have emphasized the importance and necessity of conducting “authentic activities” in which students can work with problems from the real world. Recent progress in computer, wireless communication and sensing technologies has provided opportunities to conduct authentic learning activities in the real world with supports from digital systems. Such a new development of technology-enhanced learning has been called context-aware ubiquitous learning by researchers, and shifts the learning paradigm from virtual to authentic contexts. In such an innovative learning environment, the learning system is able to sense the real-world situation of the learners, interact with them and provide them with adaptive supports accordingly. In this chapter, we shall address how the e-learning has been affected by these emerging technologies via reviewing several studies and applications; moreover, the strategies of applying the new approach as well as the potential research issues are discussed.

Keywords

Mobile Device Learning System Ubiquitous Computing Target Plant Authentic Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abowd GD (1999) Classroom 2000: an experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Syst J 38(4):508–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apkarian J, and Dawer A (2000) Interactive control education with virtual presence on the web. In: proceedings of American Control Conference June 2000, Chicago, 3985–3990Google Scholar
  3. Barrett E, Lally V (1999) Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. J Comput Assist Learn 15:48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beigl M, Gellersen HW, Schmidt A (2001) Mediacups: experience with design and use of computer-augmented everyday objects. Comput Netw 35(4):401–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Researcher 18(1):32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burks O (1996) A virtual classroom approach to teaching circuit analysis. IEEE Trans Educ 39:287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen GD, Chang CK, Wang CY (2008) Ubiquitous learning website: scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques. Comput Educ 50(1):77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen YS, Kao TC, Sheu JP (2003) A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. J Comput Assist Learn 19(1):347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng L, Marsic I (2002) Piecewise network awareness service for wireless/mobile pervasive computing. Mobile Netw Appli (MONET) 7(4):269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiou CK, Tseng JCR, Hwang GJ, Heller S (2010) An adaptive navigation support system for conducting context-aware ubiquitous learning in museums. Comput Educ 55(2):834–845Google Scholar
  11. Chu HC, Hwang GJ, Tsai CC (2010a) A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Comput Educ 54(1):289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chu HC, Hwang GJ, Tseng JCR (2010) An innovative approach for developing and employing electronic libraries to support context-aware ubiquitous learning. The Electronic Library 28(6):873–890Google Scholar
  13. Chu HC, Hwang GJ, Tsai CC, Tseng JCR (2010) A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Comput Educ 55(4):1618–1627Google Scholar
  14. Cragun BJ, Steudel HJ (1987) A decision-table-based processor for checking completeness and consistency in rule-based expert systems. Int J Man Mach Stud 26:633–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidovic A, Warren J, Trichina E (2003) Learning benefits of structural example-based adaptive tutoring systems. IEEE Trans Educ 46:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fabos B, Young MD (1999) Telecommunication in the classroom: rhetoric versus reality. Rev Educ Res 69(3):217–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feeney LM, Ahlgren B, Westerlund A (2001) Spontaneous networking: an application-oriented approach to ad hoc networking. IEEE Commun Mag 39(6):176–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ford KM, Petry FE, Adams-Webber JR, Chang PJ (1991) An approach to knowledge acquisition based on the structure of personal construct systems. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 3:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gang Z, Jason TL, Peter AN (1996) Curriculum knowledge representation and manipulation in knowledge-based tutoring systems. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 8:679–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill B (1999) A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in open-ended information system. Educ Tech Res Dev 47(1):5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill JR, Hannafin MJ (1997) Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web. Educ Tech Res Dev 45(4):37–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsieh SW, Jang YR, Hwang GJ, Chen NS (2011) Effects of teaching and learning styles on students’ reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Comput Educ 57(1):1194–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hung PH, Lin YF, Hwang GJ (2010) Formative assessment design for PDA integrated ecology observation. Educ Tech Soc 13(3):33–42Google Scholar
  24. Hwang GJ, Chang HF (2011) A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Comput Educ 56(1):1023–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hwang GJ, Tsai CC (2011) Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British J Educ Tech 42(4):E65–E70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hwang GJ, Chu HC, Lin YS, Tsai CC (2011a) A knowledge acquisition approach to developing mindtools for organizing and sharing differentiating knowledge in a ubiquitous learning environment. Comput Educ 57(1):1368–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hwang GJ, Chu HC, Shih JL, Huang SH, Tsai CC (2010a) A decision-tree-oriented guidance mechanism for conducting nature science observation activities in a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Educ Tech Soc 13(2):53–64Google Scholar
  28. Hwang GJ, Kuo FR, Yin PY, Chuang KH (2010b) A heuristic algorithm for planning personalized learning paths for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Comput Educ 54(2):404–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hwang GJ, Shi YR, Chu HC (2011b) A concept map approach to developing collaborative mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British J Educ Tech 42(5):778–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hwang GJ, Tsai CC, Yang SJH (2008) Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. J Educ Tech Soc 11(2):81–91Google Scholar
  31. Hwang GJ, Tsai PS, Tsai CC, Tseng JCR (2008) A novel approach for assisting teachers in analyzing student web-searching behaviors. Comput Educ 51(2):926–938Google Scholar
  32. Hwang GJ, Wu PH, Ke HR (2011c) An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Comput Educ 57(4):2272–2280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hwang GJ, Yang TC, Tsai CC, Yang SJH (2009) A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex experimental procedures. Comput Educ 53(2):402–413Google Scholar
  34. Jonassen DH (1994, 1999). Computers as mindtools for schools, engaging critical thinking. Prentice-Hall, NJGoogle Scholar
  35. Jonassen DH, Carr CS (2000) Mindtools: affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In: Lajoie SP (ed) Computers as cognitive tools. No more walls. Lawlence Erlbaum Associates, Inc vol 2. Hillsdale, NJ, pp 165–196Google Scholar
  36. Jonassen DH, Carr C, Yueh HP (1998) Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends 43(2):24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kawahara Y, Minami M, Morikawa H, Aoyama T (2003) A real-world oriented networking for ubiquitous computing environment. IPSJ SIG Technical Reports (UBI-1-1), 39:1–6Google Scholar
  38. Khan B (1997) Web-Based Instruction. Educational Technology Publication, NJGoogle Scholar
  39. Kindberg T, Fox A (2002) System software for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput 1(1):70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kwon O, Yoo K, Suh E (2005) ubiES: An intelligent expert system for proactive services deploying ubiquitous computing technologies. Paper presented at the 38th hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’05). Hilton Waikoloa Village, Big Island, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  41. Liaw SS, Huang HM, Chen GD (2007) An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factors toward e-learning systems. Comput Hum Behav 23:1906–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu GZ, Hwang GJ (2010) A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e-learning: towards context-aware ubiquitous learning. British J Educ Tech 41(2):E1–E9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lonsdale P, Baber C, Sharples M, Arvanitis T (2003) A context awareness architecture for facilitating mobile learning. Paper presented at the meeting of the second European conference on learning with mobile devices (MLEARN), UKGoogle Scholar
  44. Minami M, Morikawa H, Aoyama T (2004) The design of naming-based service composition system for ubiquitous computing applications. In: the proceedings of the 2004 international symposium on applications and the internet workshops (saintw’04 IEEE Comput Soc, DC, pp 304–312Google Scholar
  45. Norris C, Hossain A, Soloway E (2011) Using smartphones as essential tools for learning- a call to place schools on the right side of the 21st century. Educ Tech May-June, 18–25Google Scholar
  46. Nussbaum M, Alvarez C, McFarlane A, Gomez F, Claro S, Radovic D (2009) Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Comput Educ 52(1):147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ogata H, Yano Y (2004) Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning. Paper presented at the 2nd IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education, Taiwan, MarGoogle Scholar
  48. Panjaburee P, Hwang GJ, Triampo W, Shih BY (2010) A multi-expert approach for developing testing and diagnostic systems based on the concept-effect model. Comput Educ 55(2):527–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pena-Shaffa JB, Nichollsb C (2004) Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Comput Educ 42(3):243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peng HY, Chuang PY, Hwang GJ, Chu HC, Wu TT, Huang SA (2009) Ubiquitous performance-support system as Mindtool: A case study of instructional decision making and learning assistant. Educ Tech Soc 12(1):107–120Google Scholar
  51. Ponnekanti SR, Lee B, Fox A, Hanrahan P, Winograd T (2001) ICrafter: a service framework for ubiquitous computing environments. In: the Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on ubiquitous computing (Ubicomp), lecture notes in computer science, Springer, Georgia, 2201 56–75Google Scholar
  52. Pui ML, William GS (1996) Developing and implementing interactive multimedia in education. IEEE Trans Educ 39:430–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ringwood JV, Galvin G (2002) Computer-aided Learning in artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Educ 45(4):380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robert OH (1996) Teaching in a computer classroom with a hyperlinked, interactive book. IEEE Trans Educ 39:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rodríguez M, Favela J (2003) A framework for supporting autonomous agents in ubiquitous computing environments. Paper presented at the meeting of system support for ubiquitous computing workshop. workshop conducted at the fifth annual conference on ubiquitous computing (UbiComp), WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  56. Rogers Y, Price S, Randell C, Fraser DS, Weal M, Fitzpatrick G (2005) Ubi-learning integrating indoor and outdoor learning experiences. Commun ACM 48(1):55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sally WL (1996) A new approach to interactive tutorial software for engineering education. IEEE Trans Educ 39:399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shih JL, Chu H. C, Hwang GJ, Kinshuk (2011) An investigation of attitudes of students and teachers about participating in a context-aware ubiquitous learning activity. British J Educ Tech 42(3):373–394Google Scholar
  59. Shih JL, Chuang CW, Hwang GJ (2010) An inquiry-based mobile learning approach to enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Educ Tech Soc 13(4):50–62Google Scholar
  60. Sreenivasan R, Levine WS, Rubloff GW (2000) Some dynamic-simulator-based control education models. In: proceedings of ACC’00, Chicago, pp 3458–3462Google Scholar
  61. Uemukai T, Hara T, Nishio S (2004) A method for selecting output data from ubiquitous terminals in a ubiquitous computing environment. In: the proceedings of the 24th international conference on distributed computing systems workshops (ICDCSW) IEEE Comput Soc Japan, pp 562–567Google Scholar
  62. Wenger E (1997) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  63. William MM, Marion OH (1996) Implementation issues in SIMPLE learning environments. IEEE Trans Educ 39:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Williams van Rooij S (2009) Scaffolding project-based learning with the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK®). Comput Educ 52(1):210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yakimovicz AD, Murphy KL (1995) Constructivism and collaboration on the Internet case study of a graduate class experience. Comput Educ 24(3):203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yang SJH, Zhang J, Chen IYL (2007) Ubiquitous provision of context-aware web services. Int J Web Serv Res 4(4):83–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yang SJH, Okamoto T, Tseng SS (2008) A matter of context-aware ubiquitous learning. J Educ Technol Soc 11(2):1–2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and EducationNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations