Experimental Method for Explosion Effect Determination

Chapter
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 32)

Abstract

The study of the fragmentation originated from explosions is a challenging task, considering the conditions in which the phenomena occur. Those conditions are directly related with the nature of the explosion, which generates a high speed response of every part of the system; including dynamic behaviours from the chemical, mechanical, and aerodynamical point of view. This study presents an experimental approach to the determination of fragmentation characteristics, isolating the fragmentation effects from the shockwave. Based on standard ITOP 4-2-813, measurement methodology and instrumentation device were developed and implemented. This standard provides simple guidelines for designing experiments for explosion effects, taking into account the symmetric geometry of the explosive specimen for simplifying data recollection, by measuring mass-size in one half of a test arena and velocity of fragments in the opposite symmetric half. Velocity was assessed by microcontroller driven electronic hardware for which a custom barrier sensor was designed for manufacturing with single layer thin (thickness <0.3 mm) FR-4 copper clad. The speed reduction of a typical fragment was verified by simulation using coupled SPH-Lagrange. Finally, a sample experiment was done for checking the operation of the system, finding an ease of use in field.

Keywords

Print Circuit Board Smooth Particle Hydrodynamic Flight Time Smooth Particle Hydrodynamic Speed Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Zigler, A., Ludmirsky, A., et al.: Laser-generated shock-wave velocity measurements using a visible backlighting technique. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 19, 309–315 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, B.W., Settles, G.S., et al.: High-speed imaging of shock-wave motion in aviation security research. American Physical Society, 54th Annual Meeting of the Division of Fluid Dynamics (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, J., Liu, J., et al.: Effect of shock wave on fabricated anti-blast wall and distribution law around the wall under near surface explosion. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 14, 514–518 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eisler, R.D., Chalterjee, A.K., et al.: Simulation and modeling of penetrating wounds from small arms. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 29, 511–522 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DuBay, D., Bir, C.A., et al.: Biomechanics and injury risk assessment of less lethal munitions: analysis of the defense technology #23BR bean bag. Defense Technology Corporation of America and Institute for Preventative Sports Medicine. St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jussila, J.: Wound ballistic simulation: assessment of the legitimacy of law enforcement firearms ammunition by means of wound ballistic simulation Helsinki. http://ssf1910.dk/document/info/balistik.pdf (2005). Accessed 20 Oct 2010
  7. 7.
    US Army Test and Evaluation Command :Static testing of high explosive munitions for obtaining fragment space distribution. ITOP 4-2-813 (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversidad de los AndesBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations