Georges Lemaître and Fred Hoyle: Contrasting Characters in Science and Religion

Chapter
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 395)

Abstract

Georges Lemaître was a jocular Roman Catholic priest and Fred Hoyle a bluff Yorkshireman who despised organized religion. Both were giants of twentieth century cosmology but espoused diametrically opposed cosmological models. This paper explores the extent to which ideology, and particularly religion, played a part in the controversies over the big bang and steady-state theories. A particular problem for many cosmologists, including Hoyle, was posed by the idea that the universe had a temporal beginning: an eternal, unchanging universe seemed metaphysically preferable. And Hoyle was highly polemical about religion in his popular writings. In contrast, Lemaître saw no theological import from the big bang, and never entered a debate about its theological implications until, perhaps unexpectedly, he took issue with an address given by the Pope. Hoyle's seminal work on stellar nucleosynthesis led him to speak of a ‘superintellect monkeying with physics’ though this was never identified with the God of classical theism. The work of both Lemaître and Hoyle resonates with more recent debates concerning cosmology.

Keywords

Nonsense Word Radio Broadcast Metaphysical Principle Matter Creation Stellar Nucleosynthesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bondi, H. (1961). Cosmology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. (1957). Synthesis of the elements in stars. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29, 547–650.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deprit, A. (1984). Monsignor Georges Lemaître. In A. Berger (Ed.), The big bang and Georges Lemaître: Proceedings of a symposium in honour of G. Lemaître fifty years after his initiation of big-bang cosmology, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 10–13 Oct 1983 (pp. 363–392). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  4. Eddington, A. S. (1931). The end of the world: From the standpoint of mathematical physics. Nature, 127, 447–453.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farrell, J. (2005). The day without yesterday: Lemaître, Einstein, and the birth of modern cosmology. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gamow, G. (1952). The creation of the universe. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  7. Godart, O. (1984). The scientific work of Georges Lemaître. In A. Berger (Ed.), The big bang and Georges Lemaître: Proceedings of a symposium in honour of G. Lemaître fifty years after his initiation of big-bang cosmology, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 10–13 Oct 1983 (pp. 393–397). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  8. Hoyle, F. (1950). The nature of the universe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Hoyle, F. (1955/1970). Frontiers of astronomy. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  10. Hoyle, F. (1957). Man and materialism. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Hoyle, F. (1959). In M. Stockwood (Ed.), Religion and the scientists (pp. 55–66). London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hoyle, F. (1977). Ten faces of the universe. London: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  13. Hoyle, F. (1981). The universe: Some past and present reflections. Engineering & Science, 45:2(November), 8–12.Google Scholar
  14. Hoyle, F. (1983). The intelligent universe. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
  15. Hoyle, F., & Tayler, R. J. (1964). The mystery of the cosmic helium abundance. Nature, 203, 1108–1110.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoyle, F., & Wickramasinghe, C. (1978). Lifecloud. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
  17. Kragh, H. (1996). Cosmology and controversy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lemaître, G. (1931a). The beginning of the world from the point of view of quantum theory. Nature, 127, 706.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lemaître, G. (1931b). Contribution to British Association discussion on the evolution of the universe. Nature, 128, 704–706.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lemaître, G. (1931c). L’expansion de l’espace. Revue des Questions Scientifiques, 17, 391–440.Google Scholar
  21. The Manchester Guardian. Review of Fred Hoyle, Frontiers of Astronomy. 15 July 1955, 6.Google Scholar
  22. Mascall, E. L. (1956). Christian theology and natural science. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  23. McMullin, E. (1981). How should cosmology relate to theology? In A. R. Peacocke (Ed.), The sciences and theology in the twentieth century (pp. 17–57). Stockholm: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mitton, S. (2011). Fred Hoyle: A life in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagoner, R. V., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. (1967). On the synthesis of elements at very high temperatures. The Astrophysical Journal, 148, 3–49.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Faraday Institute for Science and ReligionSt Edmund’s CollegeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations