Abstract
This chapter presents a summary of the control approaches used to regulate the deformable mirror surface shape in AO systems. In Sect. 6.1, the different control strategies proposed in the literature to regulate the deformable mirror surface shape in AO systems are reviewed and organized into four categories, namely, classical decentralized control methods, centralized optimal control methods, distributed control methods, adaptive control methods, and others. The control problem for magnetic fluid deformable mirrors (MFDMs) is formulated in Sect. 6.2. The control system architecture for MFDM-based AO systems is first presented. Such systems typically include three major components, namely, a wavefront sensor, an MFDM wavefront corrector, and a controller. To simplify the implementation of the closed-loop control system and the testing of the performance of the proposed control algorithms, an equivalent closed-loop system configuration is formulated. The summary follows in Sect. 6.3.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Auburn J, Lorell K, Mast T, Nelson J (1987) Dynamic analysis of the actively controlled segmented mirror of the W.M. Keck ten-meter telescope. IEEE Contr Syst Mag 7(6):3–10
Bamieh B (1997) The structure of optimal controllers of spatially-invariant distributed parameter systems. Proc IEEE Conf Decis Contr 2:1056–1061
Bamieh B, Paganini F, Dahleh A (2002) Distributed control of spatially invariant systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 47:1091–1107
Baudouin L, Prieur C, Guignard F, Arzelier D (2008) Robust control of a bimorph mirror for adaptive optics systems. Appl Opt 47:3637–3645
Castros G, Paganini F (2002) Convex synthesis of localized controllers for spatially invariant systems. Automatica 38:445–456
Correia C, Raynaud HF, Kulcsar C, Conan JM (2010) On the optimal reconstruction and control of adaptive optical systems with mirror dynamics. J Opt Soc Am A 27(2):333–349
Dessenne C, Madec P, Rousset M (1997) Modal prediction for closed loop adaptive optics. Opt Lett 22:1535–1537
Downie J, Goodman W (1989) Optimal wavefront control for adaptive segmented mirrors. Appl Opt 28:5326–5332
Ficocelli M, Ben Amara F (2012) Online tuning for retinal imaging adaptive optics systems. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 20(3):747–754
Fraanje R, Massioni P, Verhaegen M (2010) A decomposition approach to distributed control of dynamic deformable mirrors. Int J Optomechatronics 4(3):269–284
Fried D (1990) Time delay induced mean square error in adaptive optics. J Opt Soc Am A 7:1224–1227
Gibson JS, Chang CC, Ellerbroek BL (2000) Adaptive optics: wave-front correction by use of adaptive filtering and control. Appl Opt 39:2525–2538
Goodman JW (2004) Introduction to Fourier optics. Roberts & Company, Colorado
Hinnen K, Verhaegen M, Doelman N (2007) Exploiting the spatiotemporal correlation in adaptive optics using data-driven H2-optimal control. J Opt Soc Am A 24:1714–1725
Hinnen K, Verhaegen M, Doelman N (2008) A data driven H2 optimal control approach for adaptive optics. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 16(3):381–389
Huang J, Looze D, Denis N, Castanon D, Wirth A (1995a) Dynamic modeling and identification of an adaptive optics system. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE conference on control applications, Albany, NY, USA, pp 456–463
Huang J, Looze D, Denis N, Castanon D, Wirth A (1995b) Control design for an adaptive optics system. In: Proceedings of the conference on decision & control, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp 3753–3756
Kulcsár C, Raynaud HF, Petit C, Conan JM, Viaris de Lesegno P (2006) Optimal control, observers and integrators in adaptive optics. Opt Express 14:7464–7476
Kulkarni J, D’Andrea R, Brandl B (2002) Application of distributed control techniques to the adaptive secondary mirror of Cornell’s large Atacama telescope. In: SPIE astronomical telescopes and instrumentation conference, vol 4839, pp 750–756
Laird P, Bergamasco R, Berube V, Borra EF, Ritcey AM, Rioux M, Robitaille N, Thibault S, Lande Vieira da Silva Jr., Yockell-Lelivre H (2003) Ferrofluid-based deformable mirrors: a new approach to AO using liquid mirrors. In: Wizinowich PL, Bonaccini D (eds) Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4839, the International Society for Optical Engineering
Laird P, Caron N, Rioux M, Borra EF, Ritcey AM (2006) Ferrofluid adaptive mirrors. Appl Opt 45(15):3495–3500
Le Roux B, Conan JM, Kulcsar C, Raynaud HF, Mugnier LM, Fusco T (2004) Optimal control law for multiconjugate adaptive optics. J Opt Soc Am A 21:1261–1276
Looze DP (2006) Minimum variance control structure for adaptive optics systems. J Opt Soc Am A 23:603–612
Looze DP (2009) Linear quadratic Gaussian control for adaptive optics systems using a hybrid model. J Opt Soc Am 26(1):1–9
Looze DP (2010) Discrete time model for an adaptive optics system with input delay. Int J Contr 83(6):1217–1231
Massioni P, Verhaegen M (2009) Distributed control for identical dynamically coupled system: a decomposition approach. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 54(1):124–135
Monirabbasi S, Gibson S (2010) Adaptive control in an adaptive optics experiment. J Opt Soc Am A 27(11):A84–A96
Montera D, Welsh B, Roggemann C, Ruck D (1997) Prediction of wavefront sensor slope measurement with artificial neural networks. Appl Opt 36:675–681
Paschall R, Anderson D (1993) Linear quadratic Gaussian control of a deformable mirror adaptive optics system with time-delayed measurements. Appl Opt 32:6347–6358
Petit C, Conan JM, Kulcsár C, Raynaud HF (2009) Linear quadratic Gaussian control for adaptive optics and multiconjugate adaptive optics: experimental and numerical analysis. J Opt Soc Am A 26(6):1307–1324
Poyneer L, Veran JP (2008) Predictive wavefront control for adaptive optics with arbitrary control loop delays. J Opt Soc Am A 25(7):1486–1496
Raynaud HF, Correia C, Kulcsar C, Conan JM (2011) Minimum variance control of astronomical adaptive systems with actuator dynamics under synchronous and asynchronous sampling. Int J Robust Nonlin Contr 21(7):768–789
Roddier F (1999) Adaptive optics in astronomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stein G, Gorinevsky DM (2005) Design of surface shape control for large two-dimensional array. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 13:422–433
Tyson RK (2000) Adaptive optics engineering handbook. Marcel Dekker, New York
Tyson RK (2011) Principles of adaptive optics. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Von Bokern MA (1990) Design of a linear quadratic Gaussian control law for an adaptive optics system. MS Thesis, School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology (AU), Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
Voulgaris PG, Bianchini G, Bamieh B (2003) Optimal H2 controllers for spatially invariant systems with delayed communication requirements. Syst Contr Lett 50:347–361
Wiberg DM, Max CE, Gavel DT (2004a) A spatial non-dynamic LQG controller: part 1, application to adaptive optics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, Atlantis, Paradise Island, Bahamas, USA, pp 3326–3332
Wiberg DM, Max CE, Gavel DT (2004b) A spatial non-dynamic LQG controller: part 2, theory. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, Atlantis, Paradise Island, Bahamas, USA, pp 3333–3338
Zhu L, Sun P, Bartsch D, Freeman W, Fainman Y (1999) Adaptive control of a micromachines continuous-membrane deformable mirror for aberration compensation. Appl Opt 38:168–176
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wu, Z., Iqbal, A., Amara, F.B. (2013). Control System Design. In: Modeling and Control of Magnetic Fluid Deformable Mirrors for Adaptive Optics Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32229-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32229-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32228-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32229-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)