Advertisement

Regional Economic Concentration and Growth

The Effects of Agglomeration in Different Types of Regions
  • Scott R. Hacker
  • Johan Klaesson
  • Lars Pettersson
  • Pär SjölanderEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The regional relationships between agglomeration and economic growth are expected to be different in different types of regions. In the literature of the new economic geography it is common to stress the importance of access to cities with agglomeration of economic activities in the form of firms and households in order to be able to explain regional growth. However, it is also well known that many rural areas are performing fairly well in terms of employment and economic opportunities.

The purpose of the present research is to analyze if concentration of population drives economic growth or if it is the other way around. A second question is if this relationship between concentration of population and growth is different in different types of regions.

In order to shed light on these two questions the economic performance of three types of Swedish regions (metropolitan-, cities- and rural regions) is related to changes in population densities.

In the empirical analysis the Shannon index is used in the measurement of regional concentration. By considering the effect of previous levels of the Shannon index on average wages we extract information on how regional concentration affects regional economic growth (expressed as growth in average wages). In the empirical analysis we employ a VAR Granger causality approach on regional Swedish yearly data from 1987 to 2006. From this analysis we are able to conclude that there are strong empirical indications that geographic agglomeration of population unidirectionally drives economic growth in metropolitan- and city regions. Concerning the rural regions no such indication is found in either direction. This is a fairly strong indication that urban regions are more dependent on economies of agglomeration compared to rural areas.

Keywords

Agglomeration economies Productivity Regions Granger causality Sweden 

References

  1. Ayat L, Burridge P (2000) Unit root tests in the presence of uncertainty about the non-stochastic trend. J Econ 95(1):71–96Google Scholar
  2. Bosker M (2007) Growth, agglomeration and convergence: a space-time analysis for European regions. Spat Econ Anal 2(1):91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brulhart M, Mathys NA (2008) Sectoral agglomeration economies in a panel of European regions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 38:348–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciccone A (2002) Agglomeration effects in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 46:213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciccone A, Hall RE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 86(1):54–70Google Scholar
  6. Clements MP, Hendry DF (1996) Intercept corrections and structural change. J Appl Econ, Special issue: Econometric forecasting, 11(5):475–494Google Scholar
  7. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431Google Scholar
  8. Doan T (2007) RATS version 7, user’s guide. Estima, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolado J, Jenkinson T, Sosvilla-Rivero S (1990) Cointegration and unit roots. J Econ Surv 4(3):249–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elder J, Kennedy PE (2001) Testing for unit roots: what should students be taught? J Econ Educ 32(2):137–146, SpringGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliott G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64:813–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Enders W (2004) Applied econometric times series, Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujita M, Thisse JF (2002) Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy. Cities, regions and international trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Pol Econ 100(6):1126–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanson GH (2001) Scale economies and the geographic concentration of industry. J Econ Geogr 1:255–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henderson JV (1988) Urban development: theory, fact, and illusion. Oxford Univ. Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirschman AO (1958) The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  20. Holden D, Perman R (1994) Unit roots and cointegration for the economist. In: Rao BB (ed) Cointegration for the applied economist. St. Martin’s, New York, pp 47–112Google Scholar
  21. Ilbery B, Bowler I, Clark G, Crockett A, Shaw A (1998) Farm-Based tourism as an alternative farm enterprise: a case study from the Northern Pennines, England. Reg Stud 32(4):355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobs J (1984) Cities and the wealth of nations. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Johansen S (1995) Identifying restrictions of linear equations with applications to simultaneous equations and cointegration. J Econ 69:111–132Google Scholar
  24. Johansson B, Klaesson J (2008) Landsbygdsföretagare måste fixa långa avstånd. In Ska hela Sverige leva? Formas FokuserarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jordbruksverket (2009) RA09:2, Nilsson, J., Petersson, M., and Petersson, L., Företagandet på Landsbygden. Stad eller land, gör det någon skillnad?Google Scholar
  26. Kaldor N (1970) The case for regional policies. Scott J Pol Econ 17(3):337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klaesson J, Pettersson L (2009) Urban–rural development in Sweden. In: Karlsson C, Andersson AE, Cheshire PC, Stough RR (eds) New directions in regional economic development. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  28. Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econometrics 54:159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Labrianidis L (2004) The future of Europe’s rural peripheries, Economic geography series. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  30. Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monetary Econ 22:3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mizon GE (1995) A simple message for autocorrelation correctors: don’t. J Econ 69:267–288Google Scholar
  32. Perron P (1988) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. J Econ Dyn Control 12(12):297–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Polese M (2005) Cities and national economic growth: a reappraisal. Urban Stud 42(8):1429–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quigley JM (1998) Urban diversity and economic growth. J Econ Perspect 12:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Pol Econ 98:71–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Romer PM (1994) The origins of endogenous economic growth. J Econ Perspect 8(1):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sbergami F (2002) Agglomeration and economic growth. Some puzzles, HEI working paper, No: 02/2002Google Scholar
  39. Schön L (2000) En modern svensk ekonomisk historia: tillväxt och omvandling under två sekel, SNS förlagGoogle Scholar
  40. Sims C (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sims CA, Stock JH, Watson MW (1990) Inference in linear time series models with some unit roots. Econometrica 58(1):161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SOU 2006:106 Fakta – omvärld – inspirationGoogle Scholar
  43. Toda HY, Phillips PCB (1994) Vector autoregression and causality: a theoretical overview and simulation study. Econo Rev 13:259–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Varga A, Schalk HJ (2004) Knowledge spillovers, agglomeration and macroeconomic growth: an empirical approach. Reg Stud 38(8):977–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott R. Hacker
    • 1
  • Johan Klaesson
    • 1
  • Lars Pettersson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pär Sjölander
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.The Swedish Board of AgricultureJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations