Advertisement

Knowledge Accessibility, Economic Growth and the Haavelmo Paradox

  • Åke E. AnderssonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Economic growth has conventionally been modelled for space-less economies. Econometrically, growth models have mostly been estimated on time series of national economies with minimal distinctions between economies as large as Japan or the USA and as small as the smallest economies of Asia and Europe. This approach to the analysis of economic growth is especially dangerous when the impact of scientific and technological knowledge is important for the process of growth. Creative activities and the formation of knowledge are highly clustered in space. Thus, the spatial distribution of accessibility to knowledge capital and investments determines economic growth of nations and other spatial aggregates.

The Haavelmo paradox contrasts chaos as the generic property of non-linear dynamic models with the fact that most statistics on macroeconomic growth processes tend towards persistent constant positive rates of growth. The paradox can be resolved if the non-linear dynamic model is subdivided into fast, private variables and very slow, public variables. Modelling spatial accessibility of knowledge as a slow, public variable and machinery and similar material capital as a relatively faster, private variable ensures stable growth, at least in the short and medium terms of the economic growth processes.

Keywords

Economic growth Chaos Multiple time scales Synergetics Adiabatic approximation 

References

  1. Andersson ÅE, Beckmann MB (2009) Economics of knowledge – theory, models and measurements. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
  2. Braconier H (1998) Essays on R&D and growth, vol 72, Lund economic studies. Department of Economics, Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  3. Braudel F (1982) The wheels of commerce civilization and capitalism 15th–18th century, vol II. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Denison EF (1967) Why growth rates differ. The Brookings Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Domar ED (1957) Essays in the theory of economic growth. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Haken H (1978) Synergetics: an introduction. Nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics chemistry and biology. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Haken H (1982) Synergetics: an introduction. Nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics chemistry and biology. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Harrod RF (1939) An essay in dynamic theory. Econ J 49:14–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heckscher EF (1955) Mercantilism, 2 vols. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuznets S (1966) Modern economic growth: rate, structure and spread. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  11. Leontief WW (1951) Studies in the structure of the American economy 1919–1939. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Maddison A (1982) Phases of capitalist development. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Maddison A (1995) Monitoring the world economy: 1820–1992. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. Morishima M (1982) Why has Japan succeeded? Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nikaido H (1968) Convex structures and economic theory. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. North D (1991) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Pirenne H (1939) Medieval cities: their origins and the revival of trade. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Puu T (1997) Nonlinear economic dynamics, 4th edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Romer PM (1986a) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Pol Econ 94:1002–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Pol Econ 98:71–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosser JB Jr (2008) Dynamic discontinuities in ecologic-economic systems. In: Allen CR, Holling CS (eds) Discontinuity theory in ecosystems and other complex systems. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Schumpeter JA (1912) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker und Humblot, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Shell K (1966) Toward a theory of inventive activity and capital accumulation. Am Econ Rev 56(2):62–68Google Scholar
  24. Smith A (1776, 2001) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Edinburgh (1776), edited and prefaced by Dr. Eamonn Butler. The Adam Smith Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quart J Econ 70:65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sugakov VI (1998) Lectures in synergetics. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  27. Swan W (1956) Economic growth and capital accumulation. Econ Record 32:334–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Uzawa H (1965) Optimum technical change in an aggregative model of economic growth. Int Econ Rev 6:18–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. von Neumann (1935–1936, 1937, 1945) Uber ein ökonomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinerung des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsatzes. In: Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, 8, 1935–1936. Franz–Deuticke, pp. 73–83. (Translated: A model of general economic equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 13:1–9, 1945)Google Scholar
  30. von Thünen J-H (1875) Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationaloekonomie. Wiegandt, Hempel & Parey, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weber M (1930) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Wicksell K (1901) Föreläsningar i nationalekonomi, första delen: Teoretisk nationalekonomi, Lund. Translated as lectures on political economy. vol 1. General theory. Routledge, London (1935). Reprint (1978), Kelley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang W-B (1991) Synergetic economics: time and change in non-linear economics. Springer Verlag, New York/BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations