Advertisement

Urban Growth

Co-evolution of Producer Services and Other Sectors
  • Johan KlaessonEmail author
  • Börje Johansson
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

A major characteristic of the economic development in Sweden during the past 10–15 years is a fast expansion of the producer-service sector. To analyse this process, the present paper employs an approach to identify the spatial pattern of local, regional and extra-regional demand for producer services. In the associated theoretical model producer-service firms grow in locations with large market access. The estimated model predicts that the supply of producer services grows in urban areas with large market access, whereas the rest of the economy shrinks in the same areas and expands in other parts of the urban region. The change process is interpreted as an effect of firms’ outsourcing of service activities when they can rely on accessibility to service suppliers. As a result service suppliers agglomerate in central parts of the urban region, where they obtain high accessibility to their customers. The estimated change process comprises a non-linear response mechanism.

Keywords

Agglomeration Producer services Regions Accessibility 

References

  1. Abdel-Rahman H, Fujita M (1990) Product variety, Marshallian externalities, and city sizes. J Reg Sci 30(2):165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M, Johansson B (2008) Innovation ideas and regional characteristics: product innovations and export entrepreneurship by firms in Swedish regions. Growth Change 39:193–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson M, Klaesson J (2006) Growth dynamics in a market-accessibility hierarchy – does the ICT service sectors follow the overall pattern. In: Johansson B, Karlsson C, Stough RR (eds) The emerging digital economy: entrepreneurship, clusters and policy. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin RE, Martin P, Ottaviano G (2001) Global income divergence, trade and industrialization: the geography of growth take-offs. J Econ Growth 6:5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black D, Henderson V (1999) A theory of urban growth. J Polit Econ 107:252–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camacho JA, Rodriguez M (2005) Services and regional development: an analysis of their role as human capital drivers in the Spanish regions. Serv Ind J 25:563–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheshire P, Magrini S (2005) Regional demographic or economic dynamism? Different causes, different consequences. Paper for JIBS workshop, June 2005, Jönköping International Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheshire P, Malecki E (2004) Growth, development and innovation: a look backward and forward. Pap Reg Sci 83:249–268Google Scholar
  9. Feenstra RC, Hanson GH (1999) The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: estimates for the United States. Q J Econ 114:907–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Forslund-J UM (1988) Education intensity and interregional location dynamics. In: Reggiani A (ed) Accessibility trade and location behaviour. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 97–120Google Scholar
  12. Forslund-J UM, Johansson B (2000) Product vintages and specialisation dynamics in a hierarchical urban system. In: Batten DF, Bertuglia CS, Martellato D, Occeli S (eds) Learning innovation and urban evolution. Kluwer, Boston, pp 165–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2002) Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaeser EL (2000) The new economics of urban and regional growth. In: Gordon C, Meric G, Feldman M (eds) The oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 83–98Google Scholar
  15. Grossman G, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the world economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Henderson JV (1988) Urban development theory, fact and illusion. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Hermelin B (2007) The urbanization and suburbanization of the service economy: producer services and specialization in Stockholm. Geogr Ann 89B:59–74Google Scholar
  18. Hohenberg P, Lees LH (1985) The making of urban Europe (1000–1950). Harvard Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoover EM (1937) Spatial price discrimination. Rev Econ Stud 4:182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johansson B, Forslund UM (2008) The analysis of location, co-location and urbanization economies. In: Karlsson C (ed) Handbook of research on cluster theory. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 39–66Google Scholar
  21. Johansson B, Klaesson J (2007) Infrastructure, labour market accessibility and economic development. In: Karlsson C, Andersson WP, Johansson B, Kobayashi K (eds) The management and measurement of infrastructure – performance, efficiency and innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 69–98Google Scholar
  22. Johansson B, Klaesson J, Olsson M (2003) Commuters’ non-linear response to time distances. J Geogr Syst 5:315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johansson B, Ryder-Olsson A, Lööf H (2010) Firm location, corporate structure and innovation. In: Karlsson C, Johansson B, Stough RR (eds) Entrepreneurship and innovations in functional regions. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  24. Karlsson C, Johansson B (2006) Dynamics and entrepreneurship in a knowledge-based economy. In: Karlsson C, Johansson B, Stough RR (eds) Entrepreneurship and dynamics in the knowledge economy. Routledge, New York/London, pp 12–46Google Scholar
  25. Klaesson J, Pettersson L (2006) Interdependent urban–rural development in Sweden. In: Karlsson C, Stough R, Cheshire P, Andersson Å (eds) Contributions to spatial science. Springer Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Koch A, Stahlecker T (2006) Regional innovation systems and the foundation of knowledge intensive business services. A comparative study in Bremen, Munich and Stuttgart, Germany. Eur Plann Stud 14:123–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolko J (2009) Urbanization, agglomeration and co-agglomeration of service industries. Public Policy Institute of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  28. Kox H, Rubalcaba L (2007) Business services and the changing structure of European economic growth. MPRA paper No 3750, Munich personal RePEc archive, University of MunichGoogle Scholar
  29. Magrini S (1998) Modelling regional economic growth: the role of human capital and innovation. Ph.D. thesis, London school of economicsGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin P, Ottaviano G (1999) Growing locations: industry location in a model of endogenous growth. Eur Econ Rev 43:281–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin P, Ottaviano G (2001) Growth and agglomeration. Int Econ Rev 42:947–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mattsson L-G (1984) Some applications of welfare maximization approaches to residential location. Pap Reg Sci 55:103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muller E, Doloreux D (2007) The key dimensions of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) analysis. Working papers firms and regions U1/2007, Frauenhofer ISI, KarlsuheGoogle Scholar
  34. Ohlin B (1933) Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Rivera-Batiz FL (1988) Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and agglomeration economies in consumption and production. Reg Sci Urban Econ 18:125–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98:71–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Storper M, Venables AJ (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. J Econ Geogr 4:351–370Google Scholar
  38. Wood P (2002) Knowledge-intensive services and urban innovativeness. Urban Stud 39:993–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wood P (2006) Urban development and knowledge-intensive business services: too many unanswered questions? Growth Change 37:335–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jönköping International Business School (JIBS)JönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation StudiesRoyal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations