Advertisement

Analysing the Competitive Advantage of Cities in the Dutch Randstad by Urban Market Overlap

  • Martijn J. BurgerEmail author
  • Frank G. van Oort
  • Ronald S. Wall
  • Mark J. P. M. Thissen
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

In the modern economy, cities are assumed to be in fierce competition. In contrast with this, regional and national Dutch policymakers advocate the Randstad region as a single urban region in which economic complementarities are supposed to be numerous. Using insights from urban systems theory and urban ecology, we introduce an indicator to estimate the degree of revealed competition between cities based on patterns of inter-firm relations between these cities. Results indicate that urban competition is more the rule than the much-anticipated urban complementarities, as urban functional influences of the Randstad cities spatially overlap.

Keywords

Urban competition Urban complementarities Randstad Holland 

References

  1. Atzema O, De Smidt M (1992) Selection and duality in the employment structure of the Randstad. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 83:289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batten DF (1995) Network cities: creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century. Urban Stud 32:313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beals EW (1984) Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Adv Ecol Res 14:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Begg I (2002) Urban competitiveness policies for dynamic cities. The Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry BJL (1964) Cities as systems within systems of cities. Pap Reg Sci 13:147–163Google Scholar
  6. Berry BJL, Parr J, Epstein G, Gosh A, Smith R (1988) Market centres and retail location: theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumenfeld H (1955) The economic base of the metropolis. J Am Inst Plann 21:114–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  9. Boston TD, Ross CL (2002) The inner city, urban poverty and economic development in the next century. Transaction Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Burt RS, Talmud I (1993) Market niche. Soc Netw 15:133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buursink J (1971) Centraliteit en Hiërarchie. De Theorie der Centrale plaatsen in Enkele Nederlandse Industriegebieden. Van Gorcum, AssenGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlino GA, Mills ES (1987) The determinants of country growth. J Reg Sci 27:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Graaff T, Van Oort F, Florax R (2010) Sectoral heterogeneity, accessibility and population-employment dynamics in Dutch cities. Working paper, Free University AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Dieleman FM, Musterd S (1992) The Randstad: a research and policy laboratory. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faith DP, Minchin PR, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Plant Ecol 69:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farell J (1996) Creating local competition. Fed Commun Law J 49:201–215Google Scholar
  17. Florida R (2005) Cities and the creative class. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Galpin J (1915) The social anatomy of an agricultural community, Research bulletin 34. Agricultural Experiment Station of University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaeser EL (2001) The economics of location-based tax incentives, Harvard institute of economic research, discussion paper no. 1932. Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon IR (1999) Internationalisation and urban competition. Urban Stud 36:1001–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hannan MT, Freeman JH (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Am J Sociol 82:929–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hessels M (1992) Locational dynamics of business services. An intrametropolitan study on the Randstad Holland. NGS 147, University of UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  23. Ho KC (2000) Competing to be regional centres: a multi-agency, multi-locational perspective. Urban Stud 37:2337–2356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huff DL (1964) Defining and estimating a trade area. J Market 28(3):34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson SC (1967) Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaufmann D, Leautier FA, Mastruzzi M (2005) Globalization and urban performance. In: Leautier FA (ed) Cities in globalizing world: governance, performance and sustainability. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 27–68Google Scholar
  27. Kloosterman RC, Lambregts B (2001) Clustering of economic activities in polycentric urban regions: the case of the Randstad. Urban Stud 38:717–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kloosterman RC, Musterd S (2001) The polycentric urban region: towards a research agenda. Urban Stud 38:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kresl PK, Singh B (1999) Competitiveness and the urban economy: twenty-four large US metropolitan areas. Urban Stud 36:1017–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lakshmanan JR, Hansen WG (1965) A retail market potential model. J Am Plann Assoc 31:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambregts B (2008) Geographies of knowledge formation in mega-city regions: some evidence from the Dutch Randstad. Reg Stud 42:1173–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lever WF (1999) Competitive cities in Europe. Urban Stud 36:935–948Google Scholar
  33. Lever WF, Turok I (1999) Competitive cities: introduction to the review. Urban Stud 36:791–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malecki EJ (2002) Hard and soft networks for urban competitiveness. Urban Stud 39:929–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Markusen A, Schrock G (2006) The distinctive city: divergent patterns in growth, hierarchy and specialization. Urban Stud 43:1301–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCann EJ (2004) ‘Best places’: interurban competition, quality of life and popular media discourse. Urban Stud 41:1909–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  38. Meijers E (2005) Polycentric urban networks and the quest for synergy: is a network of cities more than the sum of its parts? Urban Stud 42:765–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD (2007) Territorial review of Randstad Holland, Netherlands. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parr JB (1995) Alternative approaches to market-area structure in the urban system. Urban Stud 32:1317–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Podolny JM, Stuart TE, Hannan MT (1996) Networks knowledge and niches competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry 1984–1991. Am J Sociol 102:659–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Popielarz PA, Neal ZP (2007) The niche as theoretical tool. Annu Rev Sociol 33:65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Porter M (1995) The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review, Boston, pp 55–71Google Scholar
  44. Pred A (1977) City systems in advanced economies: past growth, present processes and future development options. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Reilly WJ (1931) The law of retail gravitation. Knickerbocker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Sachar A (1994) Randstad Holland: a world city? Urban Stud 31:381–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sohn M (2004) Distance and cosine measures of niche overlap. Soc Netw 23:141–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Storper M (1997) The regional world: territorial development in a global economy. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Oort FG (2007) Spatial and sectoral composition effects of agglomeration economies in the Netherlands. Pap Reg Sci 86:5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Oort FG, Ponds R, Van Vliet J, Van Amsterdam H, Declerk S, Knoben J, Pellenbarg P, Weltevreden J (2007) Verhuizingen van bedrijven en groei van werkgelegenheid. NaI Uitgevers and Ruimtelijk Planbureau, Rotterdam/Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Oort FG, Burger MJ, Raspe O (2010) On the economic foundation of the urban network paradigm: spatial integration, functional integration and economic complementarities with the Dutch Randstad. Urban Stud 47:725–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martijn J. Burger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frank G. van Oort
    • 2
  • Ronald S. Wall
    • 3
  • Mark J. P. M. Thissen
    • 4
  1. 1.Erasmus University Rotterdam and ERIMRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)The HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations