Advertisement

Metropolitan Regions and Export Renewal

  • Lina BjerkeEmail author
  • Charlie Karlsson
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Metropolitan regions are advantageous location for new export products due to factors such as external economies, diversified industry environment and a large share of skilled labour. This is the main assumption of this paper. What happens to these products when the technology becomes common knowledge? Using empirical data on exports, we find that products with a high specialisation in the metropolitan region have a tendency to be successful in the non-metropolitan regions subsequent years. Also, this export product diffusion does not seem to be related to a location in the immediate proximity to the metropolitan region. Instead, the recipient regions are mainly characterised as being centrally located in its labour market region, having a high share of highly educated individuals. Features related product standardisation such as a large manufacturing sector and low labour costs cannot be distinguished as prominent features.

Keywords

Metropolitan regions Exports Product innovation Networks Diffusion 

References

  1. Andersson ÅE, Johansson B (1984) Knowledge intensity and product cycles in metropolitan regions. Unpublished IIASA WP, International institute for applied systems analysis, LaxenburgGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson ÅE, Johansson B (1995) Förnyelse av Västsveriges Regioner: Borås en Framtida Marknadsplats i Norden (No. 92), Swedish Institute for Regional ResearchGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson M, Gråsjö U, Karlsson C (2007) Human capital and productivity in a spatial economic system. Ann Econ Stat/Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 87–88:125–143Google Scholar
  4. Anselin L (1990) Spatial dependence and spatial structural instability in applied regression analysis. J Reg Sci 30(2):185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29:155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brouwer E, Budil-Nadvornikova H, Kleinknecht A (1999) Are urban agglomerations a better breeding place for product innovation? An analysis of new product announcements. Reg Stud 33(6):541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burenstam-Linder S (1961) An essay on trade and transformation. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns AF (1934) Production trends in the United States since 1870. National Bureau of Economic Research, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantwell J (1995) The globalisation of technology: what remains of the product cycle model? Camb J Econ 19(1):155–174Google Scholar
  10. Ciccone A, Hall RE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper series, No 4313Google Scholar
  11. Clark C (1940) The conditions of economic progress. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Duranton G, Puga D (2001) Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1454–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erickson RA (1976) The filtering-down process: industrial location in a nonmetropolitan area. Prof Geogr 28(3):254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ewers H-J, Wettman RW (1980) Innovation-oriented regional policy. Reg Stud 14(3):161–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forslund U, Johansson B (1995) The Mälardalen: a leading region in Scandinavia. In: Cheshire LP, Gordon TI (eds) Territorial competition in an integrating Europe. Avebury, Aldershot, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  16. Gaspar J, Glaeser EL (1998) Information technology and the future of cities. J Urban Econ 43(1):136–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glaeser E (1999) Learning in cities. J Urban Econ 46:254–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordon IR, McCann P (2005) Innovation, agglomeration, and regional development. J Econ Geogr 5(5):523–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gråsjö U (2005) The importance of accessibility to R&D on patent production in Swedish municipalitiesGoogle Scholar
  20. Gråsjö U (2006) Spatial spillovers of knowledge production: an accessibility approach. Jönköping International Business School (Internationella handelshögsk. i Jönköping), JönköpingGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoover EM, Vernon R (1959) Anatomy of a metropolis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Howells JRL (1983) Filter-down theory: location and technology in the UK pharmaceutical industry. Environ Plann 15:147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hugosson P, Johansson B (2001) Business trips between functional regions. In: Hugosson P (ed) Interregional business travel and the economics of business interaction. Jönköping International Business School, JönköpingGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Johansson B (1993) Ekonomisk dynamik i Europa : nätverk för handel, kunskapsimport och innovationer (1. uppl. ed.). Liber-Hermod i samarbete med Institutet för framtidsstudier, MalmöGoogle Scholar
  26. Johansson B, Karlsson C (1991) Från brukssamhällets exportnät till kunskapssamhällets importnät, KarlstadGoogle Scholar
  27. Johansson B, Karlsson C (2001) Geographic transaction costs and specialisation opportunities of small and medium-sized regions. In: Johansson B, Karlsson C, Stough RR (eds) Theories of endogenous regional growth lessons for regional policies. Springer, Berlin, pp 150–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johansson B, Karlsson C (2003) Växande branscher-om Stockholmsregionens samspel med övriga landet. Stockholms läns landsting, Regionplane och trafikkontoret, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  29. Johansson B, Klaesson J, Olsson M (2003) Commuters non-linear response to time distance. J Geogr Syst 5:315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karlsson C (1999) Spatial industrial dynamics in Sweden: urban growth industries. Growth Change 30:184–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kleinknecht A, Poot T (1992) Do regions matter for R&D? Reg Stud J Reg Stud Assoc 26:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krugman P (1979a) A model of innovation, technology transfers, and the world distribution of income. J Polit Econ 87:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krugman PR (1979b) Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. J Int Econ 9(4):469–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuznets SS (1929) Retardation in economic growth. J Econ Bus Hist 1:534–560Google Scholar
  35. Kuznets SS (1930) Secular movements in production and prices: their nature and their bearing upon cyclical fluctuations. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Lucas RE Jr (1993) Making a miracle. Econometrica 61:251–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Markusen JR (1985) Profit cycles, oligopoly and regional development. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  38. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics, 8th edn. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin F et al (1979) The interregional diffusion of innovations in Canada (Report to the Ministry of Supply and Services). Ottawa and Hull, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  40. Maurseth PB, Verspagen B (1999) Europe: one or several systems of innovation? An analysis based upon patent citations. In: Fagerberg J, Guerrieri P, Verspagen B (eds) The economic challenge for Europe. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 18–43Google Scholar
  41. Norton RD, Rees J (1979) The product cycle and the spatial decentralization of American manufacturing. Reg Stud 13(2):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oakey RP, Thwaites AT, Nash PA (1980) The regional distribution of innovative manufacturing establishments in Britain. Reg Stud J Reg Stud Assoc 14:235–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perrin J-C (1988) New technologies, local synergies and regional policies in Europe. In: Aydalot P, Keeble D (eds) High technology industry and innovative environments: the European experience. Routledge, London, pp 139–162Google Scholar
  44. Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-rung growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saxenian A (1994) Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmookler J (1966) Invention and economic growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  47. Schumpeter J (1939) Business cycles. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Suarrez-Villa L, Karlsson C (1996) The development of Sweden’s R&D-intensive electronics industries: exports, outsourcing and territorial dispersion. Environ Plann A 28:783–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor M (1986) The product cycle model: a critique. Environ Plann A 18:751–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thompson WR (1965) A preface to urban economics. The John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  51. Vernon R (1960) Metropolis 1985. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. Vernon R (1966) International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quart J Econ 80(2):190–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weibull JW (1976) An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Reg Sci Urban Econ 6(4):357–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.CESISRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations