Abstract
GOCE gravity gradients are a new satellite observable, which are given in the instrument frame that is only indirectly connected to the Earth. A rotation to other frames requires to take the different accuracies of the gradients into account. We show that replacing the less accurate gradients with model information allows to rotate the tensor, but for the diagonal gradients \(V_{XX}\) and \(V_{YY}\) the model information can reach up to 50 % in the Local-North Oriented Frame, whereas it is only a few percent for \(V_{ZZ}\). We also show that in the direct comparison of GOCE gravity gradients and satellite altimetry derived gradients one has to account for the difference between the along-track altimeter derivatives and the GOCE gradients in a Cartesian frame, as well as the dynamic ocean topography signal. A validation of GOCE using ERS-1 data shows that both data sets are consistent at levels where GOCE is sensitive. For high spatial resolutions below 40 km wavelength GOCE does not contribute, as expected.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bosch W, Savcenko R (2010) On estimating the dynamic ocean topography. In: Mertikas S (ed) Gravity, geoid and earth observation, IAG symposia. vol 135, Springer, pp 263–269
Bouman J (2007) Alternative method for rotation to TRF. GO-TN-HPF-GS-0193. Issue 1.0
Bouman J (2012) Relation between geoidal undulation, deflection of the vertical and vertical gravity gradient revisited. J Geodesy 86:287–304. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0520-9
Bouman J, Fuchs M (2012) GOCE gravity gradients versus global gravity field models. Geophys J Int 189:846–850. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05428.x
Bouman J, Bosch W, Sebera J (2011) Assessment of systematic errors in the computation of gravity gradients from satellite altimeter data. Marine Geodesy 34:85–107. doi:10.1080/01490419.2010.518498
Bouman J, Fiorot S, Fuchs M, Gruber T, Schrama E, Tscherning C, Veicherts M, Visser P (2011) GOCE gravitational gradients along the orbit. J Geodesy 85:791–805. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0464-0
Brieden P, Müller J (2012) Cross-overs assess quality of GOCE gradients. In: This issue. Springer, New York
Fuchs M, Bouman J (2011) Rotation of GOCE gravity gradients to local frames. Geophys J Int 187:743753. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05162.x
Gruber T, Visser P, Ackermann C, Hosse M (2011) Validation of GOCE gravity eld models by means of orbit residuals and geoid comparisons. J Geodesy 85:845–860. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0486-7
Müller J (2003) GOCE gradients in various reference frames and their accuracies. Adv Geosci 1:33–38
Schmidt M, Fengler M, Mayer-Gürr T, Eicker A, Kusche J, Sánchez L, Han S (2007) Regional gravity modelling in terms of spherical base functions. J Geodesy 81:17–38
Sebera J, Bouman J, Bosch W (2012) On computing ellipsoidal harmonics using Jekeli’s renormalization. J Geodesy doi:10.1007/s00190-012-0549-4
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted as part of the REAL-GOCE project with the support of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouman, J., Fuchs, M., Lieb, V., Bosch, W., Dettmering, D., Schmidt, M. (2014). GOCE Gravity Gradients: Combination with GRACE and Satellite Altimetry. In: Flechtner, F., Sneeuw, N., Schuh, WD. (eds) Observation of the System Earth from Space - CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and future missions. Advanced Technologies in Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32135-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32135-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32134-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32135-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)