Advertisement

Biophysical Assessment of Skin Desquamation and Scaliness Using Tape Strips and Adhesive Discs

  • Kristien De Paepe
  • Yvan Vander Heyden
  • Vera Rogiers
Chapter

Abstract

An essential part of normal epidermal physiology is skin desquamation, the loss of single corneocytes and fine flakes at the stratum corneum (SC) surface, also called desquamatio insensibilis. Dry skin conditions – characterized by a brittle, flaky, and even fissured appearance of the upper layers – are linked to abnormal corneocytes cohesion and skin desquamation. Also a decrease in skin moisturization is observed.

Different technologies to determine skin desquamation exist. They can be used to assess skin scaliness and represent an interesting tool for claim substantiation of cosmetic products in relation to dry skin.

The scope of this chapter is to focus on the description of Corneofix® strips and D-SQUAME® discs, both adhesive tape materials that are applicable in tape-stripping protocols and for the characterization of SC desquamation and the extent of scaliness. A better understanding of these SC parameters offers opportunities for innovative product development for preventing and elevating dry, scaly skin conditions.

Keywords

Stratum Corneum Test Zone Skin Hydration Stratum Corneum Lipid Adhesive Disc 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

a.u.

Arbitrary units

DI

Desquamation index

EW

Elbow

FA

Forearm

LL

Lower leg

NMFs

Natural moisturizing factors

SC

Stratum corneum

SRRC

Scaling/roughness/redness/cracks

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Goedele Alaerts and Hayate Hajioui for their valuable practical assistance during skin measurements. Part of the described research work was supported by a grant of IWT-Vlaanderen – Flemish Institute for the Promotion of Scientific-Technological Research in Industry.

References

  1. 1.
    Agache P (2004) Metrology of the stratum corneum. In: Agache P, Humbert P (eds) Measuring the skin. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bashir SJ, Dreher F, Chew AL, Zhai H, Levin C, Stern R et al (2005) Cutaneous bioassay of salicylic acid as a keratolytic. Int J Pharm 292:187–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berthaud F, Boncheva M (2010) Correlation between the properties of the lipid matrix and the degrees of integrity and cohesion in healthy human stratum corneum. Exp Dermatol 20:255–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black D, Boyer J, Lagarde JM (2006) Image analysis of skin scaling using D-Squame® samplers: comparison with clinical scoring and use for assessing moisturizer efficacy. Int J Cosmet Sci 28:35–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breternitz M, Flach M, Prässler J, Elsner P, Fluhr JW (2007) Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping; a randomized, controlled study. Br J Dermatol 156:231–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Byrne AJ (2010) Bioengineering and subjective approaches to the clinical evaluation of dry skin. Int J Cosmet Sci 32:410–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Paepe K, Janssens K, Hachem JP, Roseeuw D, Rogiers V (2001) Squamometry as a screening method for the evaluation of hydration products. Skin Res Technol 7:184–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Paepe K, Rogiers V (2005) Corneofix F20® a new technology to define skin desquamation. In: Conference proceedings ISBS world congress, Philadelphia, 28 Sept–1 Oct 2005Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Paepe K, Rogiers V (2007) Comparative quantification of stratum corneum scaling and hydration state in young and aging skin. In: Proceedings of the IFSCC conference, Amsterdam, 24–26 Sept 2007Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dreher F, Modjtahedi BS, Modjtahedi SP, Maibach HI (2005) Quantification of stratum corneum removal by adhesive tape stripping by total protein assay in 96-well microplates. Skin Res Technol 11:97–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Escobar-Chávez JJ, Merino-Sanjuán V, López-Cervantes M, Urban-Morlan Z, Piñón-Segundo E, Quintanar-Guerrero D et al (2008) The tape-stripping technique as a method for drug quantification in skin. J Pharm Pharm Sci 11:104–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harding CR, Watkinson A, Rawlings AV, Scott IR (2000) Dry skin, moisturization and corneodesmolysis. Int J Cosmet Sci 22:21–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Houben E, De Paepe K, Rogiers V (2007) A keratinocyte’s course of life. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 20:122–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim JH, Kim BY, Choi JW, Kim SO, Lee HS, Park KC et al (2012) The objective evaluation of the severity of psoriatic scales with desquamation collecting tapes and image analysis. Skin Res Technol 18:143–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lademann J, Jacobi U, Surber C, Weigmann HJ, Fluhr J (2009) The tape stripping procedure evaluation of some critical parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 72:317–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lambers H, Pronk H (2002) Biophysical methods for stratum corneum characterization. In: Förster T (ed) Cosmetic lipids and the skin barrier. Marcel Dekker, New York/Basel, pp 185–225Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Löffler H, Dreher F, Maibach HI (2004) Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal. Br J Dermatol 151:746–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maibach HI (2005) Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping. In: Marks R, Matts P, Leévêque JL (eds) Stratum corneum: the vital structure. Stratum Corneum Group, Cardiff, pp 75–77Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manuskiatti W, Schwindt DA, Maibach HI (1998) Influence of age, anatomic site and race on skin roughness and scaliness. Dermatology 196:401–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marks R (2004) The stratum corneum barrier: the final frontier. J Nutr 134:2017S–2021SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marttin E, Neelissen-Subnel MT, De Haan FH, Boddé H (1996) A critical comparison of methods to quantify stratum removed by tape stripping. Skin Pharmacol 9:69–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Milstone LM (2004) Epidermal desquamation. J Dermatol Sci 36:131–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Piérard GE (1996) EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: evaluation by stratum corneum strippings. Skin Res Technol 2:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piérard GE, Piérard-Franchimont C, Saint-Léger D, Kligman AM (1992) Squamometry: the assessment of xerosis by colorimetry of D-Squame adhesive discs. J Soc Cosmet Chem 47:297–305Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE (2002) Beyond a glimpse at seasonal dry skin: a review. Exog Dermatol 1:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE (2004) Cyanoacrylate skin surface stripping for visualizing stratum corneum structures and dynamics. In: Agache P, Humbert P (eds) Measuring the skin. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rawlings AV (2003) Trends in stratum corneum research and the management of dry skin conditions. Int J Cosmet Sci 25:63–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Serup J (1995) EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: clinical scoring systems. Skin Res Technol 1:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schatz H, Kligman AM, Manning S, Stoudemayer T (1993) Quantification of dry (xerotic) skin by image analysis of scales removed by adhesive discs (D-squames). J Soc Cosmet Chem 44:53–63Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Simon M, Bernard D, Caubet C, Guerrin M, Egelrud T, Schmidt R et al (2002) Corneodesmosomal proteins are proteolysed in vitro by both SCTE and SCCE – two proteases which are thought to be involved in desquamation. In: Marks R, Lévêque JL, Voegeli R (eds) The essential stratum corneum. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tudela E, Lamberbourg A, Cordoba Diaz M, Zhai H, Maibach HI (2008) Tape stripping on a human nail: quantification of removal. Skin Res Technol 14:472–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Voegeli R, Heiland J, Doppler S, Rawlings AV, Schreier T (2007) Efficient and simple quantification of stratum corneum proteins on tape strippings by infrared densitometry. Skin Res Technol 13:242–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Watkinson A, Harding C, Moore A, Coan P (2001) Water modulation of stratum corneum chymotryptic enzyme activity and desquamation. Arch Dermatol Res 293:470–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Watkinson A, Smith C, Coan P, Wiedow O (2000) The role of pro-SCCE and SCCE in desquamation. IFSCC Magazine 3:45–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristien De Paepe
    • 1
  • Yvan Vander Heyden
    • 2
  • Vera Rogiers
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Toxicology, Dermato-Cosmetology and Pharmacognosy, Department of Analytical Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Technology, Center for Pharmaceutical Research (CePhar), Faculty of Medicine and PharmacyVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Analytical Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Technology, Center for Pharmaceutical Research (CePhar), Faculty of Medicine and PharmacyVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Toxicology, Dermato-Cosmetology and Pharmacognosy, Center for Pharmaceutical Research (CePhar), Faculty of Medicine and PharmacyVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations