Proposal for Everywhere Evacuation Simulation System

  • Masaru Okaya
  • Tomoichi Takahashi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7416)

Abstract

In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, evacuation simulation has the potential for decreasing the amount of damage resulting from disasters, and, in particular, for saving human lives. Agent based simulation provides a platform for computing individual and collective behaviors that occur in crowds. Such simulations have led to proposals for enhanced prompt public evacuation.

For the public, it is desirable to simulate the behavior of evacuation in any building. We propose an everywhere evacuation simulation system. This system provides a software environment that permits evacuation simulation for any location for which plans are provided on the Web. Three-dimensional (3D) models of buildings and geographic information system (GIS) data for areas that are created for everyday purposes such as sightseeing are used as the environments for simulations. The characteristics of humans are set by users, and their evacuation behaviors are simulated with the relationships among them. The results of simulations can be viewed on the Web by allocating heterogeneous agents inside 2D/3D maps of buildings.

Keywords

Parent Agent World Trade Center Escape Route Rescue Team Geographic Information System Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Abe, K., Misumi, F., Okabe, K.: Behavior Science at Natural Disasters. Fukumura Shuppan (1988) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cameron Skinner, S.R.: The RoboCup Rescue simulation platform. In: Proc. of 9th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaup, T.I.L.D.J., Finkeistein, N.M.: Modifications of the Helbing-Molnar-Farkas-Vicsek social force model for pedestrian evolution. Simulation 81(5), 339–352 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Walle, B.V., Turoff, M. (eds.): Emergency response information systems: Emerging trends and technologies. Communications of the ACM 50(3), 28–65 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farkas, I., Helbing, D., Vicsek, T.: Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407, 487–490 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galea, E.R., Hulse, L., Day, R., Siddiqui, A., Sharp, G., Boyce, K., Summerfield, L., Canter, D., Marselle, M., Greenall, P.V.: The UK WTC9/11 Evacuation Study: An Overview of the Methodologies Employed and Some Preliminary Analysis. In: Klingsch, W.W.F., Rogsch, C., Schadschneider, A., Schreckenberg, M. (eds.) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008, pp. 3–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2010), http://www.springer.com/mathematics/applications/book/978-3-642-04503-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuligowski, E.D., Gwynne, S.M.V.: The Need for Behavioral Theory in Evacuation Modeling. In: Klingsch, W.W.F., et al. (eds.) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008, pp. 721–732. Springer, Heidelberg (2008), http://www.springer.com/mathematics/applications/book/978-3-642-04503-5 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mehrotra, S., Znatri, T., Thompson, C.W. (eds.): Crisis management. IEEE Internet Computing 12(1), 14–54 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pelechano, N., Badler, N.I.: Modeling crowd and trained leader behavior during building evacuation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26(6), 80–86 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okaya, M., Yotsukura, S., Sato, K., Takahashi, T.: Agent Evacuation Simulation Using a Hybrid Network and Free Space Models. In: Yang, J.-J., Yokoo, M., Ito, T., Jin, Z., Scerri, P. (eds.) PRIMA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5925, pp. 563–570. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pan, X.: Computational Modeling of Human and Social Behaviors for Emergency Egress Analysis. PhD thesis, Stanford (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perry, R.W., Mushkatel, A. (eds.): Disaster Management: Warning Response and Cummunity Relocation. Quorum Books (1984)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ripley, A.: The Unthinkable: Who Survives When Disaster Strikes - and Why. Three Rivers Press (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takahashi, T.: RoboCup Rescue: Challenges and Lessons Learned, ch. 14, pp. 423–450. CRC Press (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamashita, T., Soeda, S., Noda, I.: Evacuation Planning Assist System with Network Model-Based Pedestrian Simulator. In: Yang, J.-J., Yokoo, M., Ito, T., Jin, Z., Scerri, P. (eds.) PRIMA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5925, pp. 649–656. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masaru Okaya
    • 1
  • Tomoichi Takahashi
    • 1
  1. 1.Meijo UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations