Online Motion Planning for Multi-robot Interaction Using Composable Reachable Sets

  • Aris Valtazanos
  • Subramanian Ramamoorthy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7416)

Abstract

This paper presents an algorithm for autonomous online path planning in uncertain, possibly adversarial, and partially observable environments. In contrast to many state-of-the-art motion planning approaches, our focus is on decision making in the presence of adversarial agents who may be acting strategically but whose exact behaviour is difficult to model precisely. Our algorithm first computes a collection of reachable sets with respect to a family of possible strategies available to the adversary. Online, the agent uses these sets as composable behavioural templates, in conjunction with a particle filter to maintain the current belief on the adversary’s strategy. In partially observable environments, this yields significant performance improvements over state-of-the-art planning algorithms. We present empirical results to this effect using a robotic soccer simulator, highlighting the applicability of our implementation against adversaries with varying capabilities. We also demonstrate experiments on the NAO humanoid robots, in the context of different collision-avoidance scenarios.

Keywords

Online Motion Planning Autonomous Decision Making Composable Behavioural Templates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    RoboCup SPL rules, pp. 1–27 (2010), http://www.tzi.de/spl/
  4. 4.
    van den Berg, J., Guy, S.J., Lin, M., Manocha, D.: Reciprocal n-body collision avoidance. In: Pradalier, C., Siegwart, R., Hirzinger, G. (eds.) Robotics Research. STAR, vol. 70, pp. 3–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruce, J.: Real-Time Motion Planning and Safe Navigation in Dynamic Multi-Robot Environments. Ph.D. thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (January 2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burridge, R.R., Rizzi, A.A., Koditschek, D.E.: Sequential composition of dynamically dexterous robot behaviors. IJRR 18(6), 534–555 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ding, J., Tomlin, C.J.: Trajectory optimization in convex underapproximations of safe regions. In: CDC, pp. 2510–2515 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fiorini, P., Shillert, Z.: Motion planning in dynamic environments using velocity obstacles. International Journal of Robotics Research 17, 760–772 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fox, D., Burgard, W., Thrun, S.: The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance. IEEE RAM 4(1), 23–33 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gordon, N.J., Salmond, D.J., Smith, A.F.M.: Novel approach to nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian state estimation. Radar and Signal Processing 140(2), 107–113 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell, I.M., Templeton, J.A.: A Toolbox of Hamilton-Jacobi Solvers for Analysis of Nondeterministic Continuous and Hybrid Systems. In: Morari, M., Thiele, L. (eds.) HSCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3414, pp. 480–494. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rimon, E., Koditschek, D.E.: Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions. IEEE Trans. Rob. Aut. 8, 501–518 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tedrake, R.: LQR-trees: Feedback motion planning on sparse randomized trees. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, Seattle, USA (June 2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tomlin, C.J., Lygeros, J., Sastry, S.S.: A game theoretic approach to controller design for hybrid systems. Proc. IEEE, 949–970 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tomlin, C.J., Mitchell, I., Bayen, A.M., Oishi, M.: Computational techniques for the verification of hybrid systems. Proc. IEEE, 986–1001 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Varaiya, P.: Hierarchical control of semi-autonomous teams under uncertainty. Final report of Darpa Contract F33615-01-C-3150 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aris Valtazanos
    • 1
  • Subramanian Ramamoorthy
    • 1
  1. 1.School of InformaticsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations