Skip to main content

The Impacts of Network Competence, Knowledge Sharing on Service Innovation Performance: Moderating Role of Relationship Quality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
LISS 2012

Abstract

This research contributes to existing literature by examining how network competence (NC), knowledge sharing (KS) and relationship quality (RQ) affect service innovation performance (SIP). The sample used in this empirical research is drawn from the Pearl River Delta of China. The results show that: (1) Enterprise’s network competence has a distinct positive impact on SIP; (2) Knowledge sharing partially mediates the effect of network competence on SIP. (3) Relationship quality positively moderates the effect of network competence on knowledge sharing, and the effect of knowledge sharing on SIP. (4) Relationship quality does not positively moderate the effect of network competence on SIP. These results enrich current understanding of the relationships among network competence, knowledge sharing, relationship quality and service innovation performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ordanini A, Parasuraman A (2011) Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: a conceptual framework and empirical analysis. J Serv Res 14(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fizgerald L, Johnston R, Silvestro R, Brignall TJ, Voss C (1991) Performance measurement in service business. CIMA, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Möller KK, Halinen A (1999) Business relationships and networks: managerial challenge of network era. Ind Mark Manag 8:28–49

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ritter T, Gemunden HG (2004) The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. J Bus Res 57:548–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Galbraith J (1973) Designing complex organizations, reading. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  7. McAdam R (2002) Knowledge management as a catalyst for innovation within organizations: a qualitative study. Knowl Process Manag 7(4):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleming L, Chen D, Mingo S (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Adm Sci Q 52:443–475

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoang H, Rothaermel FT (2005) The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Acad Manage J 48(2):332–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crosby LA, Cowles D (1990) Relationship quality in service selling: an inter-personal influence perspective. J Mark 54(7):54–82

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jaw C, Lo JY, Lin YH (2010) The determinants of new service development: service characteristics, market orientation, and actualizing innovation effort. Technovation 30(4):265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts K, Varki S, Brodie R (2003) Measuring the quality of relationships in consumer services: an empirical study. Eur J Mark 37:169–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garbarino E, Johnson MS (1999) The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. J Mark 63(2):70–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. President and Fellows of Harvard College, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta AK, Govindarajan V (2002) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strateg Manag J 21:473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bock GW, Zmud RW, Kim YG, Lee JN (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, Social Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Q 29(1):87–111

    Google Scholar 

  17. Storey C, Kelly D (2001) Measuring the performance of new service development activities. Serv Ind J 21(2):71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrews JC, Netemeyer RG, Burton S, Moberg DP, Christainsen A (2004) Understanding adolescent Intentions to smoke: an examination of relationships among social Influences, prior trial behaviors, and anti-tobacco campaign advertising. J Mark 68(3):110–123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 70872030 & No. 71090403/71090400).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaoquan Jian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jian, Z., Wang, C. (2013). The Impacts of Network Competence, Knowledge Sharing on Service Innovation Performance: Moderating Role of Relationship Quality. In: Zhang, Z., Zhang, R., Zhang, J. (eds) LISS 2012. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32054-5_80

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics