The Impacts of Network Competence, Knowledge Sharing on Service Innovation Performance: Moderating Role of Relationship Quality
This research contributes to existing literature by examining how network competence (NC), knowledge sharing (KS) and relationship quality (RQ) affect service innovation performance (SIP). The sample used in this empirical research is drawn from the Pearl River Delta of China. The results show that: (1) Enterprise’s network competence has a distinct positive impact on SIP; (2) Knowledge sharing partially mediates the effect of network competence on SIP. (3) Relationship quality positively moderates the effect of network competence on knowledge sharing, and the effect of knowledge sharing on SIP. (4) Relationship quality does not positively moderate the effect of network competence on SIP. These results enrich current understanding of the relationships among network competence, knowledge sharing, relationship quality and service innovation performance.
KeywordsService Innovation (SI) Service Innovation Performance (SIP) Network Competence (NC) Relationship Quality (RQ) Knowledge Sharing (KS).
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 70872030 & No. 71090403/71090400).
- 2.Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 3.Fizgerald L, Johnston R, Silvestro R, Brignall TJ, Voss C (1991) Performance measurement in service business. CIMA, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 4.Möller KK, Halinen A (1999) Business relationships and networks: managerial challenge of network era. Ind Mark Manag 8:28–49Google Scholar
- 6.Galbraith J (1973) Designing complex organizations, reading. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fleming L, Chen D, Mingo S (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Adm Sci Q 52:443–475Google Scholar
- 10.Crosby LA, Cowles D (1990) Relationship quality in service selling: an inter-personal influence perspective. J Mark 54(7):54–82Google Scholar
- 14.Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. President and Fellows of Harvard College, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 16.Bock GW, Zmud RW, Kim YG, Lee JN (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, Social Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Q 29(1):87–111Google Scholar
- 18.Andrews JC, Netemeyer RG, Burton S, Moberg DP, Christainsen A (2004) Understanding adolescent Intentions to smoke: an examination of relationships among social Influences, prior trial behaviors, and anti-tobacco campaign advertising. J Mark 68(3):110–123Google Scholar