Status and Prospect of Tourism Education in China
As a power of tourism, China has enjoyed a boom of tourism education during the past decades. This paper analyses the features of tourism education in China including the large scale, diversified school levels, various discipline background and courses, multi-elements of school-running patterns and so on. Meanwhile, the problems are summarized, mainly showed in the followings: (1) training-objective is vague and training-model is obsolete, (2) ideas of teaching are not innovated, (3) methods of teaching is not advanced and (4) status of graduate employment is not satisfying. Based on the analysis, some suggestions for tourism education development in China are discussed at last, such as establishing a complete tourism discipline system, expanding the research field of tourism education, deepening tourism education reform, strengthening the international cooperation and optimizing the education system.
KeywordsTourism education Status Prospect China
This work was financially supported by the Major Projects of the National Social Science Foundation of China (Project number: 10zd&051) and the Projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project number: No.41171435).
- 1.Jigang B, Feng Zh (2008) On the shrinking of China’s tourism undergraduate education and way out-thoughts about thirty years of development of tourism higher education. Tour Trib 23(5):13–17Google Scholar
- 2.Bihu W, Xiaoxiao L (2005) A research on higher tourism education in China. Tour Trib (S1)21:9–15Google Scholar
- 4.Lin L, Hongmei Zh, Ting W (2010) A study on teaching reform of bachelor in tourism based on institution renovation. China Univ Teach (2):25–27Google Scholar
- 5.Songshan H (2001) Problems and solution s on tourism higher education development in China. J Guilin Inst Tour 12(2):66–69Google Scholar
- 6.Jinwei W, Tianshu H, Caiyun S (2008) A summary of domestic researches on tourism education in the latest thirty years. J Shanxi Finance Econ Univ (higher education edition) 11(4):38–42Google Scholar