Advertisement

LISS 2012 pp 1141-1147 | Cite as

Drag Effects of Urban-Rural Digital Divide on Urbanization: Evidence from China’s Panel Data

Conference paper

Abstract

The aim of this study is to gauge the drag of China’s urban-rural digital divide (URDD) on urbanization. The study, drawing on Romer’s thought concerning growth drag, employing the Cobb-Douglas production function and an urbanization equation, derives the drag equation of URDD’s impact on urbanization. Using the co-integration methodology, unit root tests, and the panel data of provinces in China over the period from 2000 to 2009, this study documents an existence of drag and calculates its value of 6.38%, indicating that the velocity for China’s urbanization declines 6.38% in the case of drag, relative to without the drag limitation. The study also finds that in the knowledge-based digital epoch, digital techniques and awareness need to be cultivated and enhanced for rural residents, specifically the digital qualifications, with an objective of accelerating the urbanization process and achieving an equilibrium development for urban-rural areas. The study concludes with limitations and fields for future research.

Keywords

Drag Urbanization Information Urban-rural digital divide 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to place on record his deep gratitude to the NSFC project No. 107–221042 and the horizontal research program No. 107–231208 for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Nordhaus WD (1992) Lethal Model 2: the Limits to Growth Revised. Brooking Pap Econ Act (2):1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Romer D (2001) Advanced macroeconomics, 2nd edn. Shanghai University of Finance & Economics Press/The McGraw-Hill Companies, Shanghai/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Labrianidis L, Kalogeressis T (2006) The digital divide in Europe’s rural enterprises. Eur Plann Stud 14(1):23–39. Mendeley LtdGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    James J (2008) The digital divide across all citizens of the world: a new concept. Soc Indic Res 89:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inkinen T (2006) The social construction of the urban use of information technology: the case of Tampere, Finland. J Urban Technol 13(3):49–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Warren M (2007) The digital vicious cycle: links between social disadvantage and digital exclusion in rural areas. Telecommun Policy 31(6–7):374–388. Elsevier IncGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taubenbock H et al (2009) Urbanization in India-spationtemporal analysis using remote sensing data. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruckner M (2012) Economic growth, size of the agriculture sector, and urbanization in Africa. J Urban Econ 71(1):26–36. Elsevier IncGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chenery H, Syrquin M (1975) Patterns of development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1950–1970Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis JC, Henderson JV (2003) Evidence on the political economy of the urbanization process. J Urban Econ 53:98–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis K, Golden H (1954) Urbanization and the development of pre-industrial areas. Econ Dev Cult Change 3:6–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Graves P, Sexton R (1979) Over-urbanization and its relation to economic growth for less developed countries. Econ Forum 8(1):95–100Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    World Bank (2000) Entering the 21st century: world development report 1999/2000. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Yan, Huang Zhilong (2010) Re-evaluation on the level and Pace of China’s urbanization. Urban Stud 17(11):1–2Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jian Xinhua, Huang Kun (2010) Empirical analysis and forecast of the level and speed of urbanization in China. Econ Res J (3):28–39Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou YX (1995) Urban geography. The Commercial Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang Jingying, Xiong Youda, Jiang Shu (2009) Research on IDI of China in 2009. J Beijing Univ Posts Telecommu (Social sciences edition) 11(6):7–12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economics & Management InstituteXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations