Advertisement

LISS 2012 pp 791-797 | Cite as

An Evidential Reasoning Method for Multiple Attributive Group Decision Making Under Linguistic Setting

Conference paper

Abstract

Multiple attributive decision-making (MADM) problems especially those using fuzzy language are vast existed in our social life. In order to process information more exactly and help make the best decision, an evidential reasoning method is proposed. The whole passage is divided into four parts. In Sect. 1, some basic introduction of background is presented. Section 2 tells some concepts of this method. Then, detailed steps are provided in Sect. 3. This method first converts the group decision making matrix to a single decision-maker matrix based on majority rule and then makes a transformation to the attribute values in the decision matrix, use evidence theory to deal with the values after conversion and eventually gets the ranking. Finally, a numerical example is used to illustrate the use of the proposed approach in Sect. 4. The result shows the approach is quite simple, effective and easy to calculate.

Keywords

Linguistic setting Evidential reasoning Group decision making 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71101153 and No. 90924020 and the Research Funds Provided to New Recruitments of China University of Petroleum-Beijing (QD-2010-06).

References

  1. 1.
    Mohammad S, Mojtahedi H, Meysam Mousavi S, Ahmad Makui (2010) Project risk identification and assessment simultaneously using multi-attribute group decision making technique of Original Research Article, April 2010, pp 499–507Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shipley MF et al (2001) A fuzzy logic-based decision model to satisfy goals for successful product/service introduction. Eur J Oper Res 135:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu Mingxing (2011) Research on methods of equipments’ selection and ordering orient ocean environment based on MADM. National University of Defense Science and Technology, Changsha, p S2Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sivapirakasam SP, Mathew J, Surianarayanan M (2011) Multi-attribute decision making for green electrical discharge machining of Original Research Article, July 2011, pp 8370–8374Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stadtler H (2005) Supply chain management and advanced planning-basics, overview and challenges. Eur J Oper Res 163(3):575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu Z-k, Wang Y-x, Zhu T (2006) Improved multi-criteria decision making model based on evidential reasoning method. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yejun Xu, Qingli Da (2008) A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information under uncertain linguistic environment. Original Research Article. Knowl-Based Syst 21(8):837–841Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chao Fu, Shan-Lin Yang (2010) The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis. Original Research Article. Eur J Oper Res 206(3):601–608Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationChina University of PetroleumBeijingPeople‘s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations