LISS 2012 pp 57-63 | Cite as

Decision Model for the Subsides to Low-Carbon Production by the Government Under the Emission Trading Scheme

Conference paper


In the view of supply chain aspect, reducing carbon footprint becomes to the recent business trends. We build a model which includes a re-manufactory which can reduce the carbon emissions by using the recycled products participating in the production process. To support the environmental mode of production, national governments offer subsidies for the re-manufactory to support its production, but not to reduce the total profit of the whole supply chain. We build a bi-objective optimization model to analyze the optimal strategy to reduce the emissions without serious pernicious influence to the industry profit. The outcome proposes significant instructions for the decision making of government and manufactory, when they are under supply chain management.


Low carbon production Government subsidies Carbon trading Multi-objective optimization 



This paper was supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (2011JBM234) and “Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University” (NCET-11-0567).


  1. 1.
    de Brito MP, Carbone V, Meunier Blanquart C (2008) Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: organization and performance [J]. Int J Prod Econ 114:534–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sarkis J (2006) Greening the supply chain. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhu Qinghua, Dou Yijie (2007) An evolutionary model between governments and core-enterprises in green supply chains. Syst Eng: Theory Pract 27:85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hall J (2000) Environmental supply chain dynamics. J Clean Prod 8:455–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koplin J, Seuring S, Mesterharm M (2007) Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry: the case of the Volkswagen AG. J Clean Prod 15:1053–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vachon S, Klassen RD (2008) Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 111:299–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu Xiaochuan and Wang zengtao (2009) Carbon dioxide emissions policy and our optimization options. J Shanghai Univ Financ Econ 11:3–80Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shrum T (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions: policy and economics.
  9. 9.
    Chaabane A, Ramudhin A, Paquet M (2012) Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. Int J Prod Econ 135:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mitra S, Webster S (2008) Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies. Int J Prod Econ 111:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jin Ke-Di, Chu Chun-Li, Wang Yuan-Sheng (2011) Chinese high-tech industrial carbon emission trends and influencing factors analysis. Jianghuai Tribune 3:16–20Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ellerman AD, Buchner BK (2007) The European Union emissions trading scheme: origins, allocation, and early results. Rev Environ Econ Policy 1:66–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farahani RZ, Elahipanah M (2008) A genetic algorithm to optimize the total cost and service level for just-in-time distribution in a supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 111:229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guillen-Gosalbez G, Grossmann (2009) Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty [J]. AIChE J 55:99–121Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anna Nagurney (2006) On the relationship between supply chain and transportation network equilibria: a super network equivalence with computations. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev [J] 42:293–316Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations