A Reappraisal of the Medieval Approach Will Lead to Excellent Deliberators

Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 6)

Abstract

Here we find a demonstration that the Middle Ages produced a canon of good deliberation and that it was taught in universities at that time. It is argued that we should take up the study of such a canon once again. And, finally, the peregrination of the meaning of ‘rhetoric’ is presented and the art of correct reasoning finds its apotheosis.

Keywords

Embryonic Stem Cell Human Embryonic Stem Cell Moral Legitimacy Psychological Continuity High Mental Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle: Rhetoric. Dover Publications, Dover Thrift Eds (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle: Topics. Digireads.com, Lawrence, KS (2006)Google Scholar
  3. Bazán, B., Wippel, J., Fransen, G., Jacquart, D. (eds.): Les Questions Disputées et Les Questions Quodlibétiques dans les Facultés de Théologie. de Droit et de Médecine, Brepols (1985)Google Scholar
  4. Bianchi, L. (ed.): La filosofia nelle università. Secoli XIII-XIV. La Nuova Italia, Firenze (1997)Google Scholar
  5. Black, M.: The Prevalence of Humbug And Other Essays. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1983)Google Scholar
  6. Boniolo, G., De Anna, G., Vincenti, U.: Individuo e persona. Tre saggi su chi siamo. Bompiani, Milano (2007)Google Scholar
  7. Boniolo, G., Di Fiore, P.P.: A Defining Analysis of the Life and Death Dyad: Paving the Way for an Ethical Debate. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33, 609–634 (2008)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boniolo, G., Giaimo, S. (eds.): Filosofia e scienze della vita. Un’analisi dei fondamenti della biologia e della biomedicina. Bruno Mondadori, Milano (2008)Google Scholar
  9. Boniolo, G., Testa, G.: The Identity of Living Beings, Epigenetics, and The Modesty of Philosophy. Erkenntnis 76, 279–298 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boniolo, G., Vidali, P.: Strumenti per ragionare. Bruno Mondadori, Milano (2002)Google Scholar
  11. Cicero, M.T.: Cicero’s Brutus: or history of famous orators. B. White, London (1776)Google Scholar
  12. Corbett, E.P.J., Connors, R.J.: Classical Rhetoric for Modern Student. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  13. D’Ancona Costa, C.: La casa della sapienza. La trasmissione della metafisica greca e la formazione della filosofia araba. Guerini e Associati, Milano (1996)Google Scholar
  14. D’Ancona Costa, C. (ed.): Storia della filosofia nell’Islam medievale. Einaudi, Torino (2005)Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J.: How we think. Harrap, London (1910)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frankfurt, H.G.: On Bullshit. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1986)Google Scholar
  17. Kamen, N.: The Rise of Toleration. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London (1967)Google Scholar
  18. Lawn, B.: The Rise and Decline of the Scholastic “Quaestio Disputata”. E.J. Brill, Leiden (1993)Google Scholar
  19. Maierù, A.: University Training in Medieval Europe. E.J. Brill, Leiden (1994)Google Scholar
  20. Makdisi, G.: The Rise of Colleges: Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1981)Google Scholar
  21. Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (19581,1969)Google Scholar
  22. Perelman, C.: Argomentazione. In: Enciclopedia Einaudi, Einaudi, Torino, vol. I, pp. 791–823 (1977)Google Scholar
  23. Plato: Apology. In: Selected Dialogues of Plato: The Benjamin Jowett Translation. Modern Library, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  24. Remer, V.: Logica Minor, Summa Philosophiae Scholasticae, vol. I. Pontificiae Universitatis Gregorianae, Romae (1963)Google Scholar
  25. Rüegg, W. (ed.): A History of the University in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  26. Shapiro, M.: Style. In: Kroeber, A.L. (ed.) Anthropology Today. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1953)Google Scholar
  27. Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)Google Scholar
  28. Weijers, O.: La “disputatio” dans les Facultés des arts au Moyen Age. Brepols, Turnhout (2002)Google Scholar
  29. Weijers, O. (ed.): Quaeritur utrum. Recherches sur la ’disputatio’ dans les universités médiévales. Brepols, Turnhout (2009)Google Scholar
  30. Weston, A.: A Rulebook for Arguments. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Indianapolis (2000)Google Scholar
  31. Whitehead, A.N.: The Aims of Education: A Plea for Reform. Mathematical Gazette 8, 191–203 (1916); reprint in The Aims of Education and Other Essays. Macmillan Company, New York (1929) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Institute of Oncology (IEO)MilanItaly

Personalised recommendations