Advertisement

Dynamic Absorber

  • Junbo Jia
Chapter

Abstract

To absorb the kinetic energy produced by dynamic loading such as wave, wind, earthquake and ice loading on a structure.

Keywords

Ground Motion Dynamic Response Primary Structure Seismic Response Displacement Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Den Hartog JP (1947) Mechanical vibrations, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kareem A (1983) Mitigation of wind induced motion of tall buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 11(1–3):273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kareem A (1990) Reduction of wind induced motion utilizing a tuned sloshing damper. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 36:725–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    RWDI (2001) Technical notes—damping systems, Iss. 10. Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc., GuelphGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ormondroyd J, Den Harog JP (1928) The theory of dynamic vibration absorber. Trans. ASME 50(7):9–22Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bishop RED, Welbourn DB (1952) The problem of the dynamic vibration absorber, engineering, London, pp 174–769Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Snowdown JC (1960) Steady-state behaviour of the dynamic absorber. J Acoust Soc Am 31(8):1096–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Falcon KC, Stone BJ, Simcock WD, Andrew C (1967) Optimization of vibration absorbers: a graphical method for use on idealized systems with restricted damping. J Mech Eng Soc 9:374–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ioi T, Ikeda K (1978) On the dynamic vibration damped absorber of the vibration system. Bull Jpn Soc Mech Eng 21(151):64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zahrai SM, Ghannadi-Asl M (2006) Effectiveness of TMDs in mitigating seismic vibration of multi-story buildings. In: Seventh international congress on civil engineering, Tehran, Iran, 8–10 May 2006Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jia J (2014) Essentials of applied dynamic analysis. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mansour AE, Ertekin RC (2003) Proceedings of the 15th international ship and offshore structures congress, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sadek F, Mohraz B, Taylor AW, Chung RM (1996) Passive energy dissipation devices for seismic applications, NISTIR 5923, National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vandiver JK, Mitome S (1982) Effect of liquid storage tanks on the dynamic response of offshore platforms. In: Kirk CL (ed) Dynamic analysis of offshore structures. CML, Heidelberg, pp 25–32Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dodge FT (2000) The new “dynamic behaviour of liquids in moving containers. Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TexasGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warburton GB, Ayorinde EO (1980) Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 8:197–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhou F (1997) Anti-seismic control of engineering structures. China Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    GERB (2015) Tuned mass dampers for bridges, buildings and other tall structures. GERB Schwingungsisolierungen GmbH & Co.KG, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matta E, Stefano AD (2009) Robust design of mass-uncertain rolling pendulum TMDs for the seismic protection of buildings. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murudi MM, Mane SM (2004) Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass damper (TMD) for different ground motion parameters. In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, No. 2325Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gupta YP, Chandrasekaren AR (1969) Absorber system for earthquake excitation. In: Proceedings of the fourth world conference on earthquake engineering, Santiago, Chile, vol II, pp 139–148Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaynia AM, Veneziano D, Biggs JM (1981) Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers. J Struct Div ASCE 107:1465–1484Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Infinity Bridge (2009) www.flintneill.com, Flint & Neill
  24. 24.
    Infinity Bridge (2011) http://en.wikipedia.org
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Haskett T, Breukelman B, Robinson J, Kottelenberg J (2003) Tuned mass dampers under excessive structural excitation. Motioneering Inc., GuelphGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Joseph LM, Poon D, Shieh S (2006) Ingredients of high-rise design. Taipei 101 the world’s tallest building. Structure Magazine, 6, 2006Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kawano K, Venkataramana K (1992) Seismic response of offshore platform with TMD. In: 10th World conference on earthquake engineeringGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang L, Yue Q (2016) Experimental study on mitigation of ice induced offshore structure vibration with TMD. In: Proceeding of fourth China-Japan-US symposium on structural control and monitoring, HangzhouGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kanai K (1967) Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, vol 35. University of Tokyo, pp 309–25Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoang N, Fujino Y, Warnitchai P (2008) Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas. Eng Struct 30(3):707–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lou M, Jingning W (1998) Effects of soil–structure interaction on structural vibration control. Dev Geotech Eng 83:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Palazzo B, Petti L (1997) Aspects of passive control of structural vibrations. Meccanica 32:529–544CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Palazzo B, Petti L (1999) Combined control strategy: base isolation and tuned mass damping. ISET J Earthq Technol 36:121–123Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taniguchi T, Der Kiureghian A, Melkumyan M (2008) Effect of tuned mass damper on displacement demand of base-isolated structures. Eng Struct 30:3478–3488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Robinson JK, Gamble SL, Myslimaj BM (2007) Supplemental damping and using tuned sloshing dampers. Struct Mag 6:14–18Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sakai F, Takaeda S (1989) Tuned liquid column damper: new type device for suppression of building vibrations. In: Proceedings of international conference on high rise buildings, Nanjing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lee S-K, Min K-W, Lee H-R (2011) Parameter identification of new bidirectional tuned liquid column and sloshing dampers. J Sound Vib 330:1312–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hitchcock PA, Kwok KCS, Watkins RD, Samali B (1997) Characteristic of liquid column vibrations absorbers (LCVA)—I. Eng Struct 19:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hitchcock A, Kwok KCS, Watkins RD, Samali B (1997) Characteristic of liquid column vibrations absorbers (LCVA)—II. Eng Struct 19:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hochrainer MJ, Ziegler F (2006) Control of tall building vibrations by sealed tuned liquid column dampers. Struct Control Health Monit 13:980–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reiterer M, Ziegler F (2006) Control of pedestrian-induced vibrations of long-span bridges. Struct Control Health Monit 13:1003–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shimizu K, Teramura A (1994) Development of vibration control system using Ushaped tank. In: Proceedings of the first international workshop and seminar on behavior of steel structures in seismic areas, Timisoara, Romania, 7.25–7.34Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kareem A, Kijewski T, Tamura Yukio (1999) Mitigation of motions of tall buildings with specific examples of recent applications. J Wind Struct 2(3):201–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Faltinsen OM, Rognebakke OF, Lukovsky IA, Timokha AN (2000) Multidimensional modal analysis of non-linear sloshing in a rectangular tank with finite water depth. J Fluid Mech 407:201–234MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jin Q, Li X, Sun N, Zhou J, Guan J (2007) Experimental and numerical study on tuned liquid dampers for controlling earthquake response of jacket offshore platform. Mar Struct 20(4):238–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dong S, Li H, Takayama T (2001) Characteristics of tuned liquid damper for suppressing wave induced vibration. In; Proceedings of the 11th international offshore and polar engineering conference, Stavanger, Norway, pp 79–83Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xu YL, Samali B, Kwok KCS (1992) Control of along-wind response of structures by mass and liquid dampers. J Eng Mech 118(1):20–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yalla SK, Kareem A, Kantor JC (2001) Semi-active tuned liquid column dampers for vibration control of structures. Eng Struct 23:1469–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kareem A (1994) The next generation of tuned liquid dampers. In: Proceedings of the first world conference on structural control, vol I, Los Angeles, FB5. USA: IASC, pp 19–28Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yalla SK, Kareem A, Kantor JC (1998) Semi-active control strategies for tuned liquid column dampers to reduce wind and seismic response of structures. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on structural control, Kyoto, Japan, John Wiley, UK, pp 559–568Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Abe M, Kimura S, Fujino Y (1996) Control laws for semi-active tuned liquid column damper with variable orifice opening. Paper presented at the second international workshop on structural control, Hong Kong, December, 1996Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Haroun MA, Pires JA (1994) Active orifice control in hybrid liquid column dampers. In: Proceedings of the first world conference on structural control, vol I, Los Angeles, FA1. USA: IASC, pp 69–78Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Banerji P, Samanta A (2011) Earthquake vibration control of structures using hybrid mass liquid damper. Eng Struct 33(4):1291–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Love JS, Tait MJ, Toopchi-Nezhad H (2011) A hybrid structural control system using a tuned liquid damper to reduce the wind induced motion of a base isolated structure. Eng Struct 33(3):738–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kaneko S, Ishikawa M (1999) Modeling of tuned liquid damper with submerged nets. ASME J Press Vessel Technol 121:334–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Warnitchai P, Pinkaew T (1998) Modeling of liquid sloshing in rectangular tanks with flow-dampening devices. Eng Struct 20(2):593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tait MJ (2008) Modeling and preliminary design of a structure-TLD system. Eng Struct 30(10):2644–2655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tait MJ, El Damatty AA, Isyumov N, Siddique MR (2005) Numerical flow models to simulate tuned liquid dampers (TLD) with slat screens. J Fluids Struct 20:1007–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tait MJ, El Damatty AA, Isyumov N (2004) Testing of tuned liquid damper with screens and development of equivalent TMD model. Wind Struct 7(4):215–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cassolato MR, Love JS, Tait MJ (2010) Modelling of a tuned liquid damper with inclined damping screens. J Struct Control Health Monit 18(6):674–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fediw AA, Isyumov N, Vickery BJ (1995) Performance of a tuned sloshing water damper. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 57:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lee D, Ng M (2010) Application of tuned liquid dampers for the efficient structural design of slender tall buildings. CTBUH J 4:30–36Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Faltinsen OM, Timokha AN (2011) Natural sloshing frequencies and modes in a rectangular tank with a slat-type screen. J Sound Vib 330:1490–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Soong TT, Constantinou MC (1994) Passive and active structural vibration control in civil engineering. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hitchcock PA, Kwok KCS, Watkins RD (1997) Characteristics of liquid column vibration absorbers (LCVA)-I. Eng Struct 19(2):126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yalla SK, Kareem A (2002) Discussion of paper: tuned liquid dampers for controlling earthquake response of structures by P. Banerji et al., Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn., 2000; 29(5):587–602. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:1037–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Yalla SK (2001) Liquid dampers for mitigation of structural response: theoretical development and experimental validation. PhD thesis, University of Notre Dame, August, 2001Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Modi VJ, Welt F (1987) Vibration control using nutation dampers. In: International conference on flow induced vibrations, London, England, pp 369–376Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tamura Y, Fuji K, Sato T, Wakahara T, Kosugi M (1988) Wind induced vibration of tall towers and practical applications of tuned sloshing dampers. In: Proceedings of symposium/workshop on serviceability of buildings, Ottawa, Canada, vol 1, pp 228–241Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kareem A (1993) Tuned liquid dampers: past, present, and future. In: Proceedings of the seventh US national conference on wind engineeringGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Fujino Y, Sun L, Pacheco BM, Chaiseri P (1992) Tuned liquid damper (TLD) for suppressing horizontal motion of structures. J Eng Mech 118(10):2017–2030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    International Organization for Standardization (1984) Guidelines for the evaluation of the response of occupants of fixed structures, especially buildings and offshore structures, to low-frequency horizontal motion (0.063 to 1.0 Hz) ISO 6897-1984. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wakahara T, Shimada K, Tamura Y (1994) Practical application of tuned liquid damper for tall buildings. In: ASCE structures congress and IASS international symposium, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Tamura Y, Fujii K, Ohtsuki T, Wakahara T, Kohsaka R (1995) Effectiveness of tuned liquid dampers under wind excitation. Eng Struct 17(9):609–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
  77. 77.
    Yalla S, Kareem A (2000) Optimum absorber parameters for tuned liquid column dampers. J Struct Eng ASCE 126(8):906–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Rana R, Soong TT (1998) Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct 20(3):193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kitada Y, Park KC (1994) A comparative study of distributed vs. concentrated hybrid mass damper systems in high-rise buildings. In: Proceedings of the first world conference on structural control, FA2-23, vol. 3, Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
  81. 81.
    Lieber P, Jensen DP (1945) An acceleration damper: development, design, and some applications. Trans ASME 67:523–530Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Masri SF, Caughey TK (1966) On the stability of the impact damper. Transactions of the ASME, pp 586–592Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Reed III WH (1967) Hanging-chain impact dampers: a simple method for damping tall flexible structures. In: International research seminar—wind effects on buildings and structures, Ottawa, Canada, pp 284–321Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Cheng J, Hui X (2006) Inner mass impact damper for attenuating structure vibration. Int J Solids Struct 43:5355–5369CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Carotti A, Turci E (1999) A tuning criterion for the inertial tuned damper: design using phasors in the Argand–Gauss plane. Appl Math Model 23:199–217CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Ema S, Marui E (1996) A fundamental study on impact dampers. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(3):293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Cheng CC, Shiu JS (2001) Transient vibration analysis of a high speed feed drive system. J Sound Vib 239(3):489–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Dlmentberg MF, Iourtchenko DV (2004) Random vibrations with impacts: a review. Non-linear Dyn 36:229–254MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Zhang D, Angeles J (2005) Impact dynamics of flexible-joint robots. Comput Struct 83:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Ying Z, Semercigil SE (1991) Response of a new tuned vibration absorber to an earthquake-like random excitation. J Sound Vib 150(3):520–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aker SolutionsBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations