Influence of Hydrodynamic Forces and Ice During Earthquakes

  • Junbo JiaEmail author


Under strong seismic ground motion, the structure may undergo large motions. Compared to land-based structures, offshore structures cherish unique effects of fluid–structure interactions: the hydrodynamic forces due to the relative velocity and acceleration between structural members and their surrounding waters.


Seismic Response Hydrodynamic Force Structural Member Ocean Wave Offshore Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Morison JR, O’Brian MP, Johnson JW, Schaaf SA (1950) The force exerted by surface waves on piles. J Petrol Technol 2(5):149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borgman LE (1967) Spectrum analysis of ocean wave forces on piling. J Waterw Harb ASCE 93(2):129–156Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borgman LE (1969) Ocean wave simulations for engineering design. J Waterw Harb ASCE November: 557–583Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Det Norske Veritas (2014) DNV-RP-C205, environmental conditions and environmental loads, HøvikGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faltinsen OM (1990) Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chakrabarti SK (1993) Hydrodynamics of offshore structures, 2nd edn. Computational Mechanics Publications, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chakrabarti SK (1987) Hydrodynamics of offshore structures. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Venkataramana K, Kawano K (1995) Nonlinear dynamics of offshore structures under sew wave and earthquake forces. Adv Nonlinear Struct Dyn 20(2):501–512Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gurpinar A, Gryspeert BJ, Cole-Baker JR (1980) Dynamic analysis of offshore platforms under seismic excitation. In: Proceedings of the seventh world conference of earthquake engineering, Istanbul, vol 8Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jin DY, Matsui T (1997) Stochastic response analysis of jacket-type ocean platforms under simultaneously acting waves and earthquakes. Am Soc Mech Eng Saf Reliab 2:297–302Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Etemad AK, Gharabaghi ARM, Chenaghlou MR (2004) Nonlinear dynamic behavior of fixed jacket-type offshore platforms subjected to simultaneously acting wave and earthquake loads. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bargi K, Reza Hosseini S, Tadayon MH, Sharifian H (2011) Seismic response of a typical fixed jacket-type offshore platform (SPD1) under sea waves. Open J Mar Sci 1:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blevins RD (1979) Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape. Robert E. Krieger Publishing, Malabar, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jusoh I, Wolfram J (1996) Effects of Marine growth and hydrodynamic loading on offshore structuers. Junral Mekanikal Jilid 1:77–98Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    NORSOK Standard N-003 (2004) Actions and action effects, Rev. 2, Oct 2004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO 19906: 2010 (2011) Petroleum and natural gas industries—Arctic offshore structuresGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Canadian Standards Association (1992) General requirements, design criteria, the environment, and loads, CAN/CSA-S471-92Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    American Petroleum Institute (1995) Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing structures and pipelines for arctic conditions, API recommended practice, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanderson TJO (1988) Ice mechanics—risks to offshore structures. Graham and Trotmasn Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naess A, Moan T (2012) Stochastic dynamics of marine structures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnston ME, Croasdale KR, Jordaan IJ (1998) Localized pressures during ice–structure interaction: relevance to design criteria. Cold Reg Sci Technol 27(2):105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kärnä T, Kamesaki K, Tsukuda H (1999) A numerical model for dynamic ice structure interaction. Comput Struct 72:645–658CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu N, Yue Q, Guo F (2010) Mitigating ice-induced vibration by adding ice-breaking cone. In: Proceedings of the 20th international offshore and polar engineering, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bouaanani N, Paultre P, Proulx J (2002) Two-dimensional modelling of ice cover effects for the dynamic analysis of concrete gravity dams. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(12):2083–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tsinker GP (1995) Chapter 2: Marine structures in cold regions, marine structures engineering: specialized applications. Chapman & Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Han Y (1995) Dynamic behavior of pile foundations with soil–pile interactions. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s Newfoundland, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yamauchi Y, Kamesaki K, Hyodo M (2010) Numerical simulation on ice–structure interaction during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 20th international offshore and polar engineering conference, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aker SolutionsBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations