A Toolkit for Integrated Roadmaps: Employing Nanotechnologies in Water and Wastewater Treatment

  • Oleg Karasev
  • Konstantin Vishnevskiy


Integrated roadmaps can be effective instruments for forecasting and planning in the sphere of emerging technologies, as long as certain requirements are fulfilled. These requirements include: (1) the creation of a group of experts who can provide the necessary level of expertise concerning key issues related to the development of the subject area; (2) accumulation of a sufficient background information; (3) establishing an adequate sequence of Foresight methods, integrating those that are more of creative, interactive, expert- and evidence-based methods; (4) Integrating consideration of both market- pull and technology-push approaches, and (5) recognising the different kinds of effects that may be associated with implementing various new technologies. We illustrate this with the case of wastewater treatment. Roadmapping allows for the elaboration of comprehensive innovation strategies, both for short-run time frames (focusing on the commercialization of products with high market readiness), and for longer-term strategies for water sector development. The methodology allows for examining both the direct and indirect effects of the implementation of emerging technologies in the area studied, and makes it possible to outline possible future developments of the technologies considered in related sectors. The main limitation of the method as currently used may be that it is difficult to give sufficient consideration to the indirect effects of using innovative technologies, when we are dealing with fields that feature many interfaces across the economy.


Subject Field Water Industry Wastewater Industry Russian Water Knowledge Holder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahuja G, Coff RW, Lee PM (2005) Managerial Foresight and attempted rent appropriation: insider trading on knowledge of imminent breakthroughs. Strateg Manage J 26(9):791–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albright R, Kappel T (2003) Roadmapping the corporation. IEEE Engineering Management Review 31(3):32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold M, Koivunen K, Mroueh U-M, Paulsrud B, Rusten B (2008) NOWATECH – Innovative Nordic Water Technologies. Technology review. Nordic Water Technology Verification Centers, VTT, Aquateam, July 2008Google Scholar
  4. Daim TU, Oliver T (2008) Implementing technology roadmap process in the energy services sector: a case study of a government agency. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75(5):687–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Smedt P (2006) Interactions between Foresights and decision-making. SVR – Research Centre of the Flemish Government, Boudewijnlaan 30, B-1000 BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliott RN (2005) Roadmap to energy in the water and the wastewater in industry. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. FAO (2012) Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Database last updated Jan 2012, UNGoogle Scholar
  8. Flash Eurobarometer 344 (2012) Attitudes of Europeans towards water – related issues. European Commission, LuxembourghGoogle Scholar
  9. Gokhberg L, Fursov K, Karasev O (2012) Nanotechnology development and regulatory framework: the case of Russia. Technovation 32(3–4):161–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heger T, Rohrbeck R (2012) Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(5):819–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hinkebein TE, Price MK (2005) Progress with the desalination and water purification technologies US Roadmap. Desalination 182:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holmes C, Ferrill M (2005) The application of operation and technology roadmapping to aid Singaporean SMEs identify and select emerging technologies. Technol Forecast Soc Change 72(3):349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IAASTD (2008) The international assessment of agricultural knowledge. Database, GRID, United Nations Environment ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  14. IWMI (2007) Water for food, water for life! a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. In: Molden D (ed) Earthscan. International Water Management Initiative, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kappel TA (2001) Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about future. J Prod Innov Manage 18(2001):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim C, Kim H, Han SH, Kim C, Kim MK, Park SH (2009) Developing a technology roadmap for construction R&D through interdisciplinary research efforts. Automation in Construction 18:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kynkäänniemi T (2007) Product roadmapping in collaboration (Tuoteominaisuuksien julkistussuunnittelu verkottuneessa tuotekehityksessä) Espoo 2007. VTT Publications 625Google Scholar
  18. Lee S, Kang S, Park Y, Park Y (2007) Technology roadmapping for R&D planning: the case of the Korean parts and materials industry. Technovation 27:433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee J, Lee CY, Kim TY (2009a) A practical approach for beginning the process of technology roadmapping. International Journal of Technology Management 47(4):306–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee S, Yoon B, Lee C, Park J (2009b) Business planning based on technological capabilities: Patent analysis for technology-driven roadmapping. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76(6):769–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lichtenthaler U (2008) Integrated roadmaps for open innovation. Research Technology Management 51:45–49Google Scholar
  22. Means E (2004) Water and wastewater industry energy efficiency: a research roadmap. McGuire Environmental Consultants, The California Energy Commission, The American Water Works Association Research FoundationGoogle Scholar
  23. Molden D, Freken K (2007) Trends in water and agricultural development. International Water Management Institute Report, Part 2, Chapter. 2–3Google Scholar
  24. NWAR (2009) National Water Account Roadmap. Bureau of Meteorology, Australian Government, Version 2.0, 4 June 2009Google Scholar
  25. Onishchenko GG (2011) Information letter head of the federal service for supervision in the sphere of protection of consumer rights and human welfare. # 01/2175-1-32 dated March 1, 2011Google Scholar
  26. Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2001) T-Plan: the fast-start to technology roadmapping–planning your route to success. Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Popper R (2008) Foresight methodology. In: Georghiou L, Cassingena J, Keenan M, Miles I, Popper R (eds) The handbook of technology Foresight. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 44–88Google Scholar
  28. Rohrbeck R (2008) Innovating for the future – the roles of corporate Foresight in innovation management. European Center for Information and Communication Technology (EICT), Berlin, Germany & Technische Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosvodokanal (2011) Current situation in Russian water sector.
  30. Saritas О, Oner АМ (2004) Systemic analysis of UK Foresight results. Joint application of integrated management model and roadmapping. Technol Forecast Soc Change 71:27–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shuvalova O (2010) Indicators of innovation climate in Russia (results of mass population surveys). Foresight Russ 4(1):38–52Google Scholar
  32. SNL (2003) The federal desalination and water purification technology roadmap. A report of the executive committee. Sandia National Laboratories, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Jan 2003Google Scholar
  33. SNL (2006) The energy-water roadmap process. Sandia National Laboratories, U.S. Bureau of ReclamationGoogle Scholar
  34. Sokolov A, Karasev O, Rudnik P (2011) Emerging technology-related markets in Russia. J East West Bus 17:101–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. UNEP (2010) Sick water? The central role of wastewater management in sustainable development. United Nations Environmental Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. UNEP (2012a) Global environmental outlook 5: summary for policy makers. United Nations Environmental Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. UNEP (2012b) 21 issues for the 21 century. Results of the UNEP Foresight process on emerging environmental issues. United Nations Environmental Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Vishnevskiy K, Karasev O (2010) Identifying the future of new materials with the use of Foresight methods. Foresight Russ 4(2):58–67Google Scholar
  39. Vishnevskiy K, Karasev O (2011) Roadmapping for nanotechnologies in water purification: Russian experience. In: Proceedings of the Vth World Aqua Congress, New Delhi, 16–18 Nov 2011, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  40. Vishnevskiy K, Karasev O (2012) Long-term planning tools for water purification sector: roadmapping for nanotechnologies in Russia. In: Morell M (ed) Water observation and information system for decision support. Faculty of civil engineering, Ohrid. ISBN 978-608-4510-10-9Google Scholar
  41. Vishnevskiy K, Veselitskaya N, Karasev O (2012) Integrated roadmap for the nanotechnology water purification in Russia. In: 12th international GeoConference SGEM 2012. Conference Proceedings, STEF92 Technology Ltd., Sofia, pp 467–473
  42. Whalen PJ (2007) Strategic and technology planning on a roadmapping foundation. Res Technol Manage 2008:40–51Google Scholar
  43. WHO (2009a) Current situation in access to drinking-water. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  44. WHO (2009b) Mortality and burden of disease from water and sanitation. World Health Organization, 2009. Accessed 28 Sept 2012
  45. WHO (2011) In: Cameron J, Hunter P, Jagals P et al (eds) Valuing water, valuing livelihoods. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Willyard C, McClees C (1987) Motorola’s technology roadmapping process. Res Technol Manage 30:13–19Google Scholar
  47. WWDR (2009) Water in a changing world, United Nation World Water Development Report. 3rd edn. United Nations World Water Assessment ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  48. Young MD (2011) Water investing in natural capital. United Nations Environmental Programme ReportGoogle Scholar
  49. Youssef R, Sabry R, Lotfy M, Salah A (2006) Foresight of water resources and management in Egypt. The Egypt Cabinet Information and Support Center, Center for Future Studies, June 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of KnowledgeNational Research University - Higher School of Economics (HSE)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations