Skip to main content

Supplier Selection Using Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm

  • Conference paper
Virtual and Networked Organizations, Emergent Technologies and Tools (ViNOrg 2011)

Abstract

Supplier selection is one of the most critical activities of purchasing management. Nowadays, supplier selection includes a number of different and usually conflicting objectives. Because of that, modern supplier selection techniques imply solving of multiobjective optimization problems. In this paper supplier selection using evolutionary algorithm (SPEA method) is presented. As criteria for selection optimization we used variance of quality and total costs. Results show that described methodology can be applicable for the practical purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bäck, T., Hammel, U., Schwefel, H.P.: Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation 1(1), 3–17 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bross, M.E., Zhao, G.: Supplier selection process in emerging markets – The case study of Volvo Bus Corporation in China. Master Thesis. School of Economics and Commercial Law. Göteborg University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dickson, G.W.: An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing 2(1), 5–17 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farzad, T., Osman, M.R., Ali, A., Yusuff, R.M., Esfandiary, A.: AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company. JIEM 01(02), 54–76 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghodsypour, S.H., O’Brien, C.: A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytical hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics 56-67, 199–212 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Univ. of Michigan Press (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horn, J.: F1.9 multicriteria decision making. In: Bäck, T., Fogel, D.B., Michalewicz, Z. (eds.) Handbook of Evolutionary Computation. Inst. of Physics Publ., Bristol (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang, C.-L., Masud, A.S.M.: Multiple Objectives Decision Making—Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1979)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, F.H.F., Hai, L.: The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics 97(3), 308–317 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Soukup.: Supplier selection strategies. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 26(1), 7–12 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steuer, R.E.: Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. Wiley, New York (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Timmerman.: An approach to supplier performance evaluation. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 22(4), 2–8 (1986)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Tullous, R., Munson, J.M.: Trade-Offs Under Uncertainty: Implications for Industrial Purchasers. Int. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 27(3), 24–31 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dallagnol, V.A.F., Van den Berg, J., Mous, L.: Portfolio Management Using Value at Risk: A Comparison between Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 24, 766–792 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C.: Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research 50, 2–18 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright: Consumer choice strategies/simplifying vs. optimizing. Journal of Marketing Research 12, 60–67 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yahya, S., Kingsman, B.: Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development program: a case study using the analytic hierarchy process method. Journal of the Operational Research Society 50, 916–930 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Z., Lei, J., Cao, N., To, K., Ng, K.: Evolution of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. European Journal of Operational Research 4(1), 335–342 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. on Evol. Computation 3(4), 257–271 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rankovic, V., Arsovski, Z., Arsovski, S., Kalinic, Z., Milanovic, I., Rejman-Petrovic, D. (2012). Supplier Selection Using Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm. In: Putnik, G.D., Cruz-Cunha, M.M. (eds) Virtual and Networked Organizations, Emergent Technologies and Tools. ViNOrg 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31800-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31800-9_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31799-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31800-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics