Advertisement

Enhancing the Networked Enterprise for SMEs: A Service Platforms – Oriented Industrial Policy

  • Bruno Basalisco
  • Guido M. Rey
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7200)

Abstract

This work considers the application of a platform strategy in order to promote the adoption of advanced network infrastructures by Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). First, we analyse the incentives of industrial players in a context where SMEs playing an important economic role and where traditional rather than high-tech sectors of activity are predominant – with specific reference to the Italian case. Second, we review the contributions of the economic and managerial literature on platforms or two-sided markets. We leverage this by proposing a policy application of the platform concept, showing its potential benefits in allowing the manufacturing sector to gain from access to the service economy. We classify platforms according to their function and identify those types which can serve the purpose of industrial promotion. This leads us to review governance aspect which are paramount to platform functioning given the policy context. Finally, we discuss the competition policy constraints on national industrial policy (and their evolution in recent times) with a reference to the EU context.

Keywords

Professional Service Service Platform Network Enterprise General Purpose Technology Industrial Ecosystem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ambrus, A., Argenziano, R.: Asymmetric networks in two-sided markets. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 1(1), 17–52 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antonelli, C.: A regulatory regime for innovation in the communication industries. Telecommunications Policy 21(1), 35–45 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antonelli, C.: New Information Technology and the Knowledge-Based Economy. The Italian Evidence. Review of Industrial Organization 12(4), 593–607 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armstrong, M.: Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics 37(3), 668–691 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bresnahan, T.F., Trajtenberg, M.: General purpose technologies as ’engines of growth’? Journal of Econometrics 65, 83–108 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caillaud, B., Jullien, B.: Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics 34(2), 309–328 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colombo, M., Grilli, L.: Supporting high-tech start-ups: Lessons from Italian technology policy. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2(2), 189–209 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colombo, M.G., Grilli, L.: Technology policy for the knowledge economy: Public support to young ict service firms. Telecommunications Policy 31(10/11), 573–591 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evans, D.S.: How catalysts ignite: The economics of platform-based start-ups. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, ch. 5. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferdows, K., Lewis, M., Machuca, J.: Rapid-fire fulfillment. Harvard Business Review 82(11), 104–110 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friedman, T.L.: The World is Flat. The globalized world in the twenty-first century. Penguin books, London (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Review of Economic Studies 52(170), 383 (1985)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gawer, A.: Platform dynamics and strategies: From products to services. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation. Harvard Business School Press Books, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: How companies become platform leaders. Sloan Management Review 49(2), 28–35 (2008) 0019-848XGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gawer, A., Henderson, R.: Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16(1), 1–34 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghemawat, P.: Market incumbency and technological inertia. Marketing Science 10(2), 161–171 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gupta, S., Jain, D.C., Sawhney, M.S.: Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television. Marketing Science 18(3), 396–416 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hagiu, A.: Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND Journal of Economics 37(3), 720–737 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hagiu, A.: Merchant or two-sided platform? Review of Network Economics 6(2), 115–133 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joskow, P.: Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: empirical evidence from coal markets. The American Economic Review 77(1), 168–185 (1987)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nye, J.: Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Perseus Books Group (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parker, G.G., Van Alstyne, M.W.: Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science 51(10), 1494–1504 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Porter, M.M.E.: Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76(6), 77 (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Porter, M.M.E., Ketels, C.H.M.: UK Competitiveness: moving to the next stage. Technical report, DTI (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rochet, J.-C., Tirole, J.: Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association 1(4), 990–1029 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rochet, J.-C., Tirole, J.: Two-sided markets: a progress report. RAND Journal of Economics 37(3), 645–667 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ruiz-Aliseda, F., Zemsky, P.B.: Adoption is Not Development: First Mover Advantages in the Diffusion of New Technology. SSRN, SSRN eLibrary (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Santarelli, E., Vivarelli, M.: Is subsidizing entry an optimal policy? Industrial and Corporate Change 11(1), 39–52 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68(1), 1–17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Various Authors: The economic benefits from providing businesses with competitive electronic communications services. Technical report, BT group plc, London (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weyl, E.G.: A price theory of multi-sided platforms. American Economic Review 100(4), 1642–1672 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yoffie, D.B., Kwak, M.: With friends like these. Harvard Business Review 84(9), 88–98 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Basalisco
    • 1
  • Guido M. Rey
    • 2
  1. 1.Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa and Imperial College Business SchoolLondonUK
  2. 2.Scuola Superiore Sant’AnnaPisaUK

Personalised recommendations