Skip to main content

Evaluation of Creative Aesthetics

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is an edited conversation on the topic of computational evaluation of artistic artefacts. The participants were Harold Cohen, Frieder Nake, David Brown, Jon McCormack, Paul Brown and Philip Galanter. It began at the Dagstuhl seminar on computers and creativity, held in Germany in 2009 and continued over a period of several months via email. The participants discuss their views on the prospects for computational evaluation of both the artistic process and the made artefact.

Keywords

  • Aesthetic Judgement
  • Computational Evaluation
  • Aesthetic Evaluation
  • Human Artist
  • Computational Creativity

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31727-9_4
  • Chapter length: 17 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-31727-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    Elements of this section are based on the initial Dagstuhl group discussions (Boden et al. 2009).

  2. 2.

    For important considerations of these issues, we refer the reader to the contributions in Part III.

  3. 3.

    By “in-line” Cohen is referring to evaluation of aesthetic decisions as a work proceeds.

  4. 4.

    At the time of writing this statement, Cohen was very focused on translating his theories of colour and colour harmony into algorithms that AARON could use to colour abstract shapes.

  5. 5.

    Nikos Hadjikyriakos-Ghikas, a 20th-century Greek artist and academic.

  6. 6.

    Max Bense was an influential German philosopher and Nake’s teacher and mentor in his formative years as an artist exploring the generative possibilities of the computer in the 1960s.

  7. 7.

    By Birkhoff’s formula, the square evaluates to the polygon with the highest aesthetic value.

  8. 8.

    This view is also shared by Dorin and Korb in Chap. 13.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contribution from all the participants, including the original Dagstuhl discussion group on this topic, which consisted of Harold Cohen, Margaret Boden, David Brown, Paul Brown, Oliver Deussen and Philip Galanter. The discussion group notes can be found at http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2009/2212/. The interview in this chapter was edited by Jon McCormack.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold Cohen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, H. et al. (2012). Evaluation of Creative Aesthetics. In: McCormack, J., d’Inverno, M. (eds) Computers and Creativity. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31727-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31727-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31726-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31727-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)