Skip to main content

Classification of Uncertain Data: An Application in Nondestructive Testing

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computational Intelligence (IPMU 2012)

Abstract

The classification of data with dynamically changing uncertainty characteristics is a problem for many practical applications. As an example in the field of nondestructive testing (NDT), magnetic flux leakage (MFL) measurements are used to inspect pipelines. The data is analyzed manually afterwards. In this paper we use a framework for handling uncertainties called Trust Management and a extended fuzzy rule based classifier to identify different installations within pipelines by MFL-data. The results show a classification performance of over 90% with an additional, reliable measure for the trustworthiness of every single classification result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brockmann, W., Buschermöhle, A., Hülsmann, J.: A Generic Concept to Increase the Robustness of Embedded Systems by Trust Management. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 2037–2044. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buschermöhle, A., Rosemann, N., Brockmann, W.: Stable Classification in Environments with Varying Degrees of Uncertainty. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control & Automation, pp. 441–446. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carvalho, A., Rebello, J., Sagrilo, L., Camerini, C., Miranda, I.: MFL Signals and Artificial Neural Networks Applied to Detection and Classification of Pipe Weld Defects. NDT & E International 39(8), 661–667 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Central Intelligence Agency: The world factbook (November 2011), http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/

  5. Chow, C.: On Optimum Recognition Error and Reject Tradeoff. IEEE Trans. Information Theory 16(1), 41–46 (1970)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubuisson, B., Masson, M.: A Statistical Decision Rule with Incomplete Knowledge about Classes. Pattern Recognition 26(1), 155–165 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehteram, S., Moussavi, S., Sadeghi, M., Mahdavi, S., Kazemi, A.: Intelligent Monitoring Approach for Pipeline Defect Detection from MFL Inspection. Journal of Convergence Information Technology 5(2), 43–49 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank, A., Asuncion, A.: UCI Machine Learning Repository (2010), http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  9. Haueisen, J., Unger, R., Beuker, T., Bellemann, M.: Evaluation of Inverse Algorithms in the Analysis of Magnetic Flux Leakage Data. IEEE Trans. Magnetics 38(3), 1481–1488 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hühn, J., Hüllermeier, E.: FR3: A Fuzzy Rule Learner for Inducing Reliable Classifiers. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems 17(1), 138–149 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hülsmann, J., Buschermöhle, A., Brockmann, W.: Incorporating Dynamic Uncertainties into a Fuzzy Classifier. In: Proc. 7th Conf. of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, EUSFLAT, vol. 1, pp. 388–395. Atlantis Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Landgrebe, T., Tax, D., Paclík, P., Duin, R.: The Interaction between Classification and Reject Performance for Distance-Based Reject-Option Classifiers. Pattern Recognition Letters 27(8), 908–917 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mix, P.: Introduction to Nondestructive Testing: A Training Guide, pp. 73–77. Wiley Interscience (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pipeline Operators Forum: Specifications and Requirements for Intelligent PIG Inspection of Pipelines (2009), http://www.pipelineoperators.org/publicdocs/POF_specs_2009.pdf

  15. Slessarev, D., Sukhorukov, V., Belitsky, S., Vasin, E., Stepanov, N.: Magnetic In-Line Inspection of Pipelines: Some Problems of Defect Detection, Identification and Measurement. In: Proc. 9th European NDT Conf. ECNDT (2006), http://www.ndt.net

  16. Song, Q.: Data Fusion for MFL Signal Characterization. Applied Mechanics and Materials 44, 3519–3523 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. US National Energy Technology Laboratory, PHMSA. Pipeline Inspection Technologies Demonstration Report. Tech. rep. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hülsmann, J., Brockmann, W. (2012). Classification of Uncertain Data: An Application in Nondestructive Testing. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IPMU 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 299. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31717-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31718-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics