Discovering Gene-Drug Relationships for the Pharmacology of Cancer

  • Elisabetta Fersini
  • Enza Messina
  • Alberto Leporati
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 298)

Abstract

The combined analysis of tissue microarray and drug response datasets has the potential of revealing valuable knowledge about the relationships between gene expression and drug activity of tumor cells. However, the amount and the complexity of biological data needs appropriate data mining and machine learning algorithms to uncover possible interesting patterns. In order to identify a suitable profile of cancer patients for revealing the link between gene expression profiles, drug activity responses and type of cancer, a learning framework based on three building blocks is proposed: p-Median based clustering, information gain feature selection and Bayesian Network prediction. The experimental investigation highlights three main findings: (1) the relational clustering approach is able to create groups of cell lines that are highly correlated both in terms of gene expression and drug response; (2) from a biological point of view, the gene selection performed on these clusters allows for the identification of a subset of genes that are strongly involved into several cancer processes; (3) the final prediction of drug responses, by using the patient profile obtained through clustering and gene selection, represents an initial step for predicting potential useful drugs.

Keywords

Bayesian Network Drug Response Information Gain Gene Selection Joint Probability Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chang, J.H., Hwang, K.B., Zhang, B.T.: Analysis of gene expression profiles and drug activity patterns by clustering and Bayesian network learning. In: Methods of Microarray Data Analysis II, pp. 169–184. Kluwer Academic Publisher (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang, J.H., Hwang, K.B., Oh, S.J., Zhang, B.: Bayesian network learning with feature abstraction for gene-drug dependency analysis. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 3(1), 61–77 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jarvinen, P., Rajala, J., Sinervo, H.: A branch and bound algorithm for seeking the pmedian. Operational Research 20, 173–178 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kutalik, Z., Beckmann, J., Sven, B.: A modular approach for integrative analysis of large-scale gene-expression and drug-response data. Nat. Biotech. 26, 531–539 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paull, K.D., Shoemaker, R.H., Hodes, L., Monks, A., Scudiero, D.A., Rubinstein, L., Plowman, J., Boyd, M.R.: Display and analysis of patterns of differential activity of drugs against human tumor cell lines: development of mean graph and COMPARE algorithm. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 81, 1088–1092 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scherf, U., Ross, D.T., Waltham, M., Smith, L.H., Lee, J.K., Tanabe, L., Kohn, K.W., Reinhold, W.C., Myers, T.G., Andrews, D.T., Scudiero, D.A., Eisen, M.B., Sausville, E.A., Pommier, Y., Botstein, D., Brown, P.O., Weinstein, J.N.: A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Journal of Nature Genetics 66, 236–244 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabetta Fersini
    • 1
  • Enza Messina
    • 1
  • Alberto Leporati
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations