Article 43 [Tasks and Instruments for Implementing the CSDP]

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
  • Stelio Mangiameli
Chapter

Abstract

Art. 43 TEU is related to Art. 42.1 TEU, which defines the CSDP as “an integral part” of the CFSP, providing “the Union with an operational capacity drawing on civilian and military assets”. This operational capacity is meant at fulfilling “missions outside the Union for peacekeeping, conflict prevention and strengthening international security in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter”.

Keywords

Crisis Management European Council Council Decision Security Sector Security Sector Reform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abass, A. (2007). Extraterritorial collective security: The European Union and Operation Artemis. In M. Trybus & N. D. White (Eds.), European Security Law (pp. 134–156). Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duke, S. (2002). The EU and crisis management. Developments and prospects. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  3. Koskenniemi, M. (1997). International law aspects of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. In M. Koskenniemi (Ed.), International law aspects of the European Union. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  4. Koutrakos, P. (2007). Security and Defence Policy within the context of EU external relations: Issues of coherence, consistency and effectiveness. In M. Trybus & N. D. White (Eds.), European Security Law (pp. 249–269). Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kronenberger, V., & Wouters, J. (Eds.). (2004). The European Union and conflict prevention. Legal and policy aspects. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.Google Scholar
  6. Marauhn, T. (1996). Building a European Security and Defence Identity: The evolving relationship between the Western European Union and the European Union. Bochum: Universitätsverlag N Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
  7. Missiroli, A. (2003). The European Union: Just a regional peacekeeper. European Foreign Affairs Review, 8(4), 493–503.Google Scholar
  8. Naert, F. (2005). European Security and Defence in the EU Constitutional Treaty. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 10(2), 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Naert, F. (2007). ESDP in practice: Increasingly varied and ambitious EU Security and Defence Operations. In M. Trybus & N. D. White (Eds.), European Security Law (pp. 59–111). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  10. Osinga, F. (2004). Défense européenne et capacités militaires: qui s’en soucie vraiment? In F. Terpan (Ed.), La politique européenne de sécurité et de defense de l’Union européenne. L’UE peut-elle gérer les crises? (pp. 61–133). Toulouse: Presses de l’Institut d’études politiques de Toulouse.Google Scholar
  11. Pagani, F. (1998). A new gear in the CFSP machinery: Integration of the Petersberg Tasks in the Treaty on European Union. European Journal of International Law, 9(4), 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rutten, M. (Ed.). (2002). From Nice to Laeken, European Defence: Core documents (Vol. II). Chaillot Papers. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Sossai, M. (2007). The anti-terrorism dimension of ESDP. In M. Trybus & N. D. White (Eds.), European Security Law (pp. 157–173). Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Terpan, F. (2003). La politique étrangère et de sécurité commune de l’Union européenne. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
  15. Terpan, F. (2004). La politique européenne de sécurité et de defense de l’Union européenne. L’UE peut-elle gérer les crises? Toulouse: Presses de l’Institut d’études politiques de Toulouse.Google Scholar
  16. Terpan, F. (2007). EU-NATO relations: Consistency as a strategic consideration and a legal requirement. In M. Trybus & N. D. White (Eds.), European Security Law (pp. 270–294). Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Terpan, F. (2010). La politique étrangère, de sécurité et de défense de l’Union européenne. Paris: La documentation française.Google Scholar
  18. Terpan, F. (2011). La prise de décision dans la PESC: un mode de fonctionnement intergouvernemental controversé. In M. Blanquet (Ed.), La prise de décision dans le système de l’Union européenne (pp. 157–176). Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
  19. Tsagourias, N. (2007). EU peacekeeping operations: Legal and theoretical issues. In M. Trybus & N. D. White (Eds.), European Security Law (pp. 112–133). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  20. White, N. (2007). The EU as a Regional Security Actor within the International Legal Order. In M. Trybus & N. D. White (Eds.), European Security Law (pp. 329–350). Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
    • 1
  • Stelio Mangiameli
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty for Economics, Law and Social ScienceUniversity of ErfurtErfurtGermany
  2. 2.National Research Council Institute for Regionalism, Federalism and Self-GovernmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations