Article 36 [The Parliamentary Dimension of CFSP]

(ex-Article 21 TEU)
  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
  • Stelio Mangiameli


The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy 6 shall regularly consult 6,7 the European Parliament on the main aspects and the basic choices of the common foreign and security policy and the common security and defence policy 10,11 and inform 12–15 it of how those policies evolve. He shall ensure that the views of the European Parliament are duly taken into consideration. 16 Special representatives 8 may be involved in briefing the European Parliament.


Security Policy National Parliament European Security Basic Choice Federal Constitutional 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Born, H. (2008). Parliamentary oversight of ESDP missions, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) (Policy Paper No. 28). Accessed 20 June 2012.
  2. Calliess, C., & Ruffert, M. (Eds.). (2011). EUV/AEUV, Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta. Kommentar (4th ed.). Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
  3. Cutler, R., & von Lingen, A. (2002). The European Parliament and European Union Security and Defense Policy. European Security, 12(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dietrich, S. (2006). Europäische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik (ESVP). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  5. Grabitz, E., Hilf, M., & Nettesheim, M. (Eds.). (2011). Das Recht der Europäischen Union (loose leaf). Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
  6. Hailbronner, K., & Wilms, H. (2010). Recht der Europäischen Union. Kommentar (loose leaf). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  7. Hilf, M., & Schorkopf, F. (1999). Das Europäische Parlament in den Außenbeziehungen der Europäischen Union. Europarecht, 34(2), 185–202.Google Scholar
  8. Lotter, C. (1997). Die Parlamentarische Versammlung der WEU: Demokratische Kontrolle europäischer Sicherheitspolitik. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  9. Maurer, A., Kietz, D., & Völkel, C. (2005). Interinstitutional Agreements in the CFSP parliamentarisation through the Back Door? European Foreign Affairs Review, 10(2), 175–195.Google Scholar
  10. Mittag, J. (2003). Die parlamentarische Dimension der ESVP: Optionen für eine europäische Verfassung. Integration, 26(2), 152–161.Google Scholar
  11. Schmidt-Radefeldt, R. (2005). Parlamentarische Kontrolle der internationalen Streitkräfteintegration. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmidt-Radefeldt, R. (2009). Die Europäische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungsunion—Ein parlamentsfreier Raum? Überlegungen zur demokratischen Legitimation im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Neue Zeitschrift für Wehrrecht, 51(6), 234–249.Google Scholar
  13. Schwarze, J. (Ed.). (2009). EU-Kommentar (2nd ed.). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  14. Streinz, R. (Ed.). (2012). EUV/AEUV (2nd ed.). Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
  15. Thym, D. (2005). Parlamentsfreier Raum?, Das Europäische Parlament in der Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik. Accessed 20 June 2012.
  16. van der Groeben, H., & Schwarze, J. (Eds.). (2003). Kommentar zum Vertrag über die Europäische Union und zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft (6th ed.). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
    • 1
  • Stelio Mangiameli
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty for Economics, Law and Social ScienceUniversity of ErfurtErfurtGermany
  2. 2.National Research Council Institute for Regionalism, Federalism and Self-GovernmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations