Advertisement

Article 25 [The Instruments for the Conduct of the CFSP]

(ex-Article 12 TEU)
  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
  • Stelio Mangiameli
Chapter

Abstract

The Union shall conduct the common foreign and security policy by 1–4,6:

Keywords

Foreign Policy Security Policy European Council National Court Legal Basis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Table of Cases

ECJ

  1. ECJ 18.01.2007, C-229/05P, Ocalan, ECR I-439 [cit. in para 23]Google Scholar
  2. ECJ 03.09.2008, C-402/05P and C-415/05P, Kadi v Council and Commission, ECR I-6351 [cit. in para 23]Google Scholar

CFI

  1. CFI 21.09.2005, T-306/01, Ahmed Ali Yusuf et al. v Council and Commission, ECR II-3533 [cit. in para 3, 23]Google Scholar
  2. CFI 21.09.2005, T-315/01, Kadi et al. v Council and Commission, ECR II-3649 [cit. in para 3, 23]Google Scholar
  3. CFI 12.12.2006, T-228/02, Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d’Iran v Council, ECR II-4665 [cit. in para 23]Google Scholar
  4. CFI 31.01.2007, T-362/04, Minin v Commission, ECR II-2003 [cit. in para 23, 29]Google Scholar

References

  1. Cf. also the references in Art. 26Google Scholar
  2. Adam, R., & Tizzano, A. (2010). Lineamenti di Diritto dell’Unione europea. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  3. Addalon, P. (2008). L’action extérieure de l’Union européenne. In D. Simon (Ed.), Le traité de Lisbonne: oui, non mais à quoi? in Europe (p. 6). Actualité du droit communautaire Google Scholar
  4. Baratta, R. (2002). Overlaps between European community competence and European Union. Foreign policy activity. In E. Cannizzaro (Ed.), The European Union as an actor in international relations (pp. 52–75). The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Biscop, S. (2008). The European Security Strategy in context: A comprehensive trend. In S. Biscop & J. J. Andersson (Eds.), EU and the European Security Strategy: Forging a global Europe (pp. 5–20). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Blockmans, S. (2008). The European Union and crisis management: Policy and legal aspects. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherubini, P. (2012). The role and the interactions of the European Council and the Council in the Common Foreign and Security Policy. In H.-J. Blanke & S. Mangiameli (Eds.), The European Union after Lisbon. Constitutional basis, economic order and external action (pp. 471–479). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cremona, M., & De Witte, B. (2008). EU foreign relations law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  9. Crowe, R. (2008). The Treaty of Lisbon: A revised legal framework for the organisation and functioning of the European Union. ERA Forum, 9(2), 163–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dashwood, A., & Marescau, M. (2008). Law and practice of EU external relations: Salient features of a changing landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Baere, G. (2008). Constitutional principles of EU external relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Hert, P., & Pakonstantinou, V. (2009). The PNR agreement and transatlantic anti-terrorism cooperation: No firm Human Rights Framework on either side of the Atlantic. Common Market Law Review, 46(3), 885–919.Google Scholar
  13. De Pasquale, P. (2008). Il riparto di competenze tra Unione europea e Stati membri nel Trattato di Lisbona. DPCE, 60–69.Google Scholar
  14. De Wilde d’Estmael, T. (2011). La PESC au lendemain du traité de Lisbonne. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
  15. Fiengo, G. (2008). Gli atti “atipici” della Comunità europea. Naples: Editoriale scientifica.Google Scholar
  16. Gross, E. (2009). The Europeanization of National Foreign Policy: Continuity and change in European Crisis Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hillion, C., & Wessel, R. A. (2009). Competence distribution in EU external relations after Ecowas: Clarification or continued fuzziness? Common Market Law Review, 46(2), 551–586.Google Scholar
  18. Hofmann, R. (2007). Agreements in EU law. European Law Review, 31(6), 800–820.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, E., & Van Genugten, S. (2009). The future of European Foreign Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Lazowski, A. (2008). Enhanced multilateralism and enhanced bilateralism: Integration without membership in the European Union. Common Market Law Review, 45(5), 1433–1458.Google Scholar
  21. Louis, J. V. (2006). La Cour et les relations extériures de la Communauté. Cahiers de droit européen, 285–291.Google Scholar
  22. Mignolli, A. (2009). L’azione esterna dell’Unione europea e il principio di coerenza. Naples: Jovene Editore.Google Scholar
  23. Milano, E. (2008). Il trasferimento di funzioni da UNMIK a EULEX in Kosovo. Riv. dir. intern., 967–990.Google Scholar
  24. Munari, F. (2008). Le relazioni esterne. Sud in Europa, 16–18.Google Scholar
  25. Munari, F. (2011). La politica e di sicurezza comune (PESC) e il sistema delle fonti ad essa relative. Diritto dell’Unione Europea, 941–970.Google Scholar
  26. Novi, C. (2005). La politica di sicurezza esterna dell’Unione europea. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  27. Palladini, L. (2009). Le misure restrittive adottate nell’ambito della PESC: prassi e giurisprudenza. Diritto dell’Unione Europea, 14(2), 341–377.Google Scholar
  28. Peroni, G. (2011). Alcune considerazioni sulla personalità giuridica dell’Unione europea dopo Lisbona. Dir. Comm. Int., 809–823.Google Scholar
  29. Puoti, P. (2008). La PESC nella prospettiva del Trattato di revisione. Studi sull’integrazione europea, 539–574.Google Scholar
  30. Remacle, E. (2004). L’intégration de la politique de défense européenne. Potentiel et limites. In P. Magnette (Ed.), La grande Europe (pp. 321–334). Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  31. Risi, C. (2010). L’azione esterna dell’Unione europea dopo Lisbona. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica.Google Scholar
  32. Rossi, L. S. (2007). Conclusione di accordi internazionali e coerenza del sistema:l’esclusività della competenza comunitaria. Rivista di diritto internazionale, 1008–1027.Google Scholar
  33. Terpan, F. (2011). La prise de décision dans la PESC: un mode de fonctionnement intergouvernemental controversé. In M. Blanquet (Ed.), La prise de décision dans le système de l’Union européenne (pp. 157–176). Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
  34. Tesauro, G. (2010). Diritto dell’Unione europea. Padova: Cedem.Google Scholar
  35. Thym, D. (2010). Foreign affairs. In A. von Bogdandy & J. Bast (Eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (2nd ed., pp. 309–344). Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  36. Villani, U. (2011). Gli sviluppi del Trattato di Lisbona in materia di politica estera e di sicurezza comune. St. integr. eur., 9–23.Google Scholar
  37. Yakemtchouk, R. (2009). “La politique étrangère” de l’Union européenne. Revue du Marché Commun, 217–227.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
    • 1
  • Stelio Mangiameli
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty for Economics, Law and Social ScienceUniversity of ErfurtErfurtGermany
  2. 2.National Research Council Institute for Regionalism, Federalism and Self-GovernmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations