Advertisement

Article 15 [The European Council]

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
  • Stelio Mangiameli
Chapter

Abstract

1. The European Council shall provide the Union with the necessary impetus for its development and shall define the general political directions and priorities thereof. 11–16 It shall not exercise legislative functions.

Keywords

Security Policy Foreign Affair European Council Judicial Review Simple Majority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blumann, C., & Dubouis, L. (2010). Droit institutionnel de l’Union européenne (4th ed.). Paris: LexisNexis Litec.Google Scholar
  2. Bribosia, H. (2008). The main institutional innovations of the Lisbon treaty. In S. Griller & J. Ziller (Eds.), The Lisbon treaty. EU constitutionalism without a constitutional treaty? (pp. 58–78). Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Burgorgue-Larsen, L., Levade, A., & Picod, F. (Eds.). (2007). Traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe – Commentaire article par article, Partie I et IV ‘Architecture constitutionnelle’, Tome 1. Bruxelles: Bruylant.Google Scholar
  4. Craig, P. (2010). The Lisbon treaty law: Politics and treaty reform. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig, P., & de Búrca, G. (2007). EU law (4th ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  6. Curtin, D. (2009). Executive power of the European Union. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glaesner, H.-J. (1994). The European Council. In D. Curtin & T. Heurkels (Eds.), Institutional dynamics of European integration – Essays in honour of Henry G. Schermers (Vol. II, pp. 101–115). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Jacqué, J.-P. (2010). Conseil européen. JurisClasseur Europe Traité. Fascicule 221.Google Scholar
  9. Jacqué, J.-P. (2011). Institutions de l’Union (2010). Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, 47(1), 131–143.Google Scholar
  10. Piris, J.-C. (2010). The Lisbon treaty. A legal and political analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaddous, C. (2008). Role and position of the high representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy under the Lisbon treaty. In S. Griller & J. Ziller (Eds.), The Lisbon treaty. EU constitutionalism without a constitutional treaty? pp. (205–221). Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Karagiannis, S. (2005). Le Conseil européen. In V. Constantinesco, Y. Gautier, & V. Michel (Eds.), Le traité établissant un Constitution pour l’Europe – Analyses et commentaires (pp. 133–147). Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  13. Pertek, J. (2011). Conseil européen, Répertoire de Droit communautaire. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
  14. Picot, F. (2010). Le nouveau cadre institutionnel de l’Union européenne. La Semaine juridique – Edition générale, 14, 725–734.Google Scholar
  15. Sap, J. W. (2005). The European President. European Constitutional Law Review, 1(1), 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Werts, J. (2008). The European Council. London: John Harper Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Wessels, W. (2010). The European Council: Beyond the traditional view towards a fusion. In Melanges en l’honneur de Jean Paul Jacqué (pp. 751–764). Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
    • 1
  • Stelio Mangiameli
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty for Economics, Law and Social ScienceUniversity of ErfurtErfurtGermany
  2. 2.National Research Council Institute for Regionalism, Federalism and Self-GovernmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations