Advertisement

Article 12 [The Role of National Parliaments]

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
  • Stelio Mangiameli
Chapter

Abstract

National Parliaments 14–17 contribute actively to the good functioning of the Union 18–27 :

Keywords

Early Warning System Veto Power National Parliament Democratic Legitimacy Yellow Card 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Table of Cases

  1. ECJ 12.11.1996, C-84/94, United Kingdom v Council, ECR I-5755 [cit in para 61]Google Scholar
  2. ECJ 09.10.2001, C-377/98, Netherlands v Parliament and Council, ECR I-7079 [cit in para 61]Google Scholar
  3. ECJ 10.12.2002, C-491/01, The Queen v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd and Imperial Tobacco Ltd, ECR I-11453 [cit in para 61]Google Scholar
  4. ECJ 12.07.2005, Joined Cases C-154/04 and C-155/04, Alliance for Natural Health et al., ECR I-6451 [cit in para 61]Google Scholar

References

  1. Adinolfi, A. (2010). La Corte di Giustizia dell’Unione europea dopo il Trattato di Lisbona. Rivista di diritto internazionale, 1, 45–64.Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez Conde, E., & López de los Mozos Díaz-Madronero, A. E. (2006). Los Parlamentos nacionales y la Unión Europea: el mecanismo de alerta temprana. Revista de Derecho Político, 65, 149–168.Google Scholar
  3. Amico, G. (2009). Lo sviluppo della cooperazione interparlamentare a livello globale. In C. Decaro & N. Lupo (Eds.), Il “dialogo” tra parlamenti: obiettivi e risultati (pp. 25–96). Rome: Luiss University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Avbely, M. (2009–2010). The Treaty of Lisbon, an ongoing search for structural equilibrium. Columbia Journal of European Studies, 16, 521–530.Google Scholar
  5. Barents, R. (2010). The Court of Justice after the Treaty of Lisbon. Common Market Law Review, 47(3), 709–728.Google Scholar
  6. Bergman, T. (1997). National parliaments and EU affairs committees: Notes on empirical variations and competing explanations. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(3), 373–387.Google Scholar
  7. Bermann, G. (2009). National parliaments and subsidiarity – An outsider’s view. In I. Pernice & E. Tanchev (Eds.), Ceci n’est pas une Constitution – Constitutionalisation without Constitution? (pp. 155–161). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  8. Besselink, L. (2001). The role of National Parliaments. The Dutch experience in comparative perspective. www.iecl.ie/Besselink%202.doc. Accessed 28 June 2012.
  9. Besselink, L. (2006). Shifts in governance: National parliaments and their governments’ involvement in European Union decision-making. In G. Barrett (Ed.), National parliaments and the European Union: The constitutional challenge for the Oireachtas and other Member State Legislatures (pp. 117–131). Dublin: Clarus Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bilancia, P. (2009). The role and powers of European and National Parliaments in the dynamics of integration. Rivista italiana di Diritto pubblico comunitario, 273–284.Google Scholar
  11. Blumann, C., & Dubouis, L. (2010). Droit institutionnel de l’Union Européenne (4th ed.). Paris: LexisNexis-Litec.Google Scholar
  12. Blümel, B., & Neuhold, C. (2007). The parliament of Austria: A “normative” tiger? In O. Tans, C. Zoethout, & J. Peters (Eds.), National parliaments and European democracy. A bottom-up approach to European Constitutionalism (pp. 143–160). Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Born, H., Anghel, S., Dowling, A., & Fuior, T. (2008). Parliamentary oversight of EDSP missions. Geneva Center for Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) (Policy Paper No. 28, Geneva, 2008). http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-publications/reports/2008/Report_07_08.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2012.
  14. Bribosia, E. (2005). La répartition des compétences entre l’Union et ses États membres. In M. Dony & E. Bribosia (Eds.), Commentaires de la Constitution de l’Union européenne (pp. 47–82). Brussels: L.G.D.J.Google Scholar
  15. Brosius-Gersdorf, F. (1999). Die doppelte Legitimationsbasis der Europäischen Union. Europarecht, 34(2), 133–169.Google Scholar
  16. Buschmann, M., & Daiber, B. (2011). Subsidiaritätsrüge und Grundsatz der begrenzten Einzelermächtigung. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 64(13), 504–509.Google Scholar
  17. Bußjäger, P. (2010). La via procedurale alla sussidiarietà: la partecipazione dei Parlamenti nazionali e delle assemblee regionali nel Trattato di Lisbona e i relativi problemi. In J. Woelk & P. Bußjäger (Eds.), Il Trattato di Lisbona e le Regioni: il controllo di sussidiarietà (pp. 51–71). Bolzano: Eurac Research.Google Scholar
  18. Calliess, C. (2012). Der Kampf um den Euro: Eine “Angelegenheit der Europäischen Union“ zwischen Regierung, Parlament und Volk. Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, 1–7.Google Scholar
  19. Calliess, C., & Ruffert, M. (2011). EUV/AEUV (4th ed.). Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  20. Cannizzaro, E. (2005). La riforma della legge La Pergola e le competenze di Stato e Regioni nei processi di formazione e di attuazione del norme dell’Unione europea. Rivista di diritto internazionale, 153–156.Google Scholar
  21. Cartabia, M. (1994). Il pluralismo istituzionale come forma della democrazia sopranazionale. Politica del diritto, 2, 203–227.Google Scholar
  22. Cartabia, M. (2007). In Associazione italiana dei costituzionalisti (Ed.), Annuario 2005 – L’integrazione dei sistemi costituzionali europeo e nazionali. Atti del XX Convegno Annuale – Catania, 14-15 ottobre 2005 (pp. 103–150). Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  23. Carter, C. A. (2001). The Parliament of the UK from supportive scrutiny to unleashed control? In A. Maurer & W. Wessels (Eds.), National Parliaments on their way to Europe: Losers or latecomers? Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  24. Chalmers, D., Hadjiemmanuil, C., Monti, G., & Tomkins, A. (2006). European law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Classen, C. D. (2009). Legitime Stärkung des Bundestages oder verfassungsrechtliches Prokustesbett? Zum Urteil des BVerfG zum Vertrag von Lissabon. Juristen Zeitung, 64(18), 881–889.Google Scholar
  26. Constantinesco, V. (1997). Les clauses de “cooperation renforcée”, le protocole sur l’application des principes de subsidiarité et de proportionnalité. Revue trimestrielle de droit européen, 33(4), 751–767.Google Scholar
  27. Cooper, J. (2006). The watchdogs of subsidiarity. National parliaments and the logic of arguing in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 281–304.Google Scholar
  28. Craig, P. (2008). The Treaty of Lisbon: Process, architecture and substance. European Law Review, 33(2), 137–166.Google Scholar
  29. Craig, P. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty. Law, politics and treaty reform. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  30. Cygan, A. (2003). Democracy and accountability in the European Union – The view from the House of Commons. Modern Law Review, 66(3), 384–401.Google Scholar
  31. D’Atena, A. (2000). Sussidiarietà e sovranità, in Associazione Italiana dei Costituzionalisti, La Costituzione europea – Annuario 1999. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  32. Dann, P. (2004). Parlamente im Exekutivföderalismus. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Dann, P. (2010). The political institutions. In A. von Bogdandy & J. Bast (Eds.), Principles of European constitutional law (pp. 237–273). Portland/Munich: Hart Publishing/C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  34. Davies, G. (2003). The post-Laeken division of compentences. European Law Review, 28(5), 686–698.Google Scholar
  35. De Felice, D. (2008). Il ritorno degli sconfitti: il controllo dei Parlamenti nazionali sul comportamento governativo in sede Europea. In E. Rossi (Ed.), Studi pisani sul Parlamento (pp. 263–291). II, Pisa: Plus.Google Scholar
  36. De Martino, F. R. (2002). Parlamento nazionale e decisione comunitaria. In M. Scudiero (Ed.), Il diritto costituzionale europeo. Principi e diritti fondamentali (Vol. II, pp. 229–250), tomo I. Naples: Jovene.Google Scholar
  37. De Moor, A., & Vermeulen, G. (2010). The Europol Council Decision: Transforming Europol into an Agency of the European Union. Common Market Law Review, 47(4), 1089–1121.Google Scholar
  38. Decaro, C., & Lupo, N. (2009). Introduzione. In C. Decaro & N. Lupo (Eds.), Il “dialogo” tra parlamenti: obiettivi e risultati (pp. 9–22). Rome: Luiss University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Dechâtre, L. (2011). La décision de Karlsruhe sur le mécanisme européen de stabilité financière: une validation sous condition et une mise en garde sibylline pour l’avenir. CDE, 47, 9–22.Google Scholar
  40. Dero-Bugny, D. (2009). Art. 88-5. In F. Luchaire, G. Conac, & X. Prétot (Eds.), La Constitution de la République française. Analyse et commentaires (3rd ed., pp. 1956–1970). Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  41. Di Capua, A. (2005). Parlamenti nazionali e Parlamento europeo. Prime considerazioni sui Protocolli sul ruolo dei Parlamenti nazionali e sull’applicazione dei principi di sussidiarietà e di proporzionalità. In P. Bianchi, E. Catelani, & E. Rossi (Eds.), Le “nuove” fonti comunitarie (pp. 115–129). Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  42. Di Giovine, A., & Mastromarino, A. (Eds.). (2007). La presidenzializzazione degli esecutivi nelle democrazie contemporanee. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  43. Dieringer, J. (2005). Entparlamentarisierung oder Renaissance der Volksvertretungen? Zur Rolle nationaler Parlamente im europäischen Integrationsprozess. In K. Beckmann, J. Dieringer, & U. Hufeld (Eds.), Eine Verfassung für Europa (pp. 235–260). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  44. Dougan, M. (2008). The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: Winning minds, not hearts. Common Market Law Review, 45(3), 617–703.Google Scholar
  45. Esposito, A. (2009). Il Trattato di Lisbona e il nuovo ruolo costituzionale dei parlamenti nazionali: le prospettive per il Parlamento italiano. Rassegna parlamentare, 4, 1119–1173.Google Scholar
  46. Everling, U. (2010). The European Union as a federal association of states and citizens. In A. von Bogdandy & J. Bast (Eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (2nd ed., pp. 701–734). Portland/Munich: Hart Publishing/C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  47. Fasone, C. (2010). Quale è la fonte più idonea a recepire le novità del Trattato di Lisbona sui Parlamenti nazionali? n. 3/2010. www.Osservatoriosullefonti.it. Accessed 28 June 2012.
  48. Feral, P. A. (1998). Le principe de subsidiarité, progrès ou status quo après le Traité d’Amsterdam? Revue du Marché Unique de l’Union Européenne, 5(1), 95–118.Google Scholar
  49. Ferraro, F. (2003). Il ruolo dei Parlamenti nazionali nella fase ascendente dell’Unione europea. Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, 183–192.Google Scholar
  50. Fischer, H. K. (2010). Der Vertrag von Lissabon (2nd ed.). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  51. Gambale, P. (2006). Le “garanzie parlamentari” nella fase ascendente del diritto comunitario: cenni di diritto comparato e novità nell’ordinamento italiano. Rassegna parlamentare, 3, 833–852.Google Scholar
  52. Geiger, R., Khan, D.-E., & Kotzur, M. (Eds.). (2010). EUV/AEUV Kommentar (5th ed.). Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  53. Gennart, M. (2010). Les Parlements Nationaux dans le Traité de Lisbonne: évolution ou révolution? CDE, 46(1–2), 17–46.Google Scholar
  54. Gianniti, L. (2010). Il ruolo dei Parlamenti nazionali. In F. Bassanini & G. Tiberi (Eds.), Le nuove istituzioni europee. Commento al Trattato di Lisbona (2nd ed., pp. 171–190). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  55. Gourlay, C. (2004). Parliamentary accountability and EDSP: The National and the European level. In H. Born & H. Hänggi (Eds.), The “double democratic deficit” (pp. 183–200). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  56. Grabenwarter, C. (2007). Die Rolle der nationalen Parlamente in den Mitgliedstaaten (nationale und regionale Ebene). In H. Schäffer & J. Iliopoulos-Strangas (Eds.), Staatsmodernisierung in Europa (pp. 85–138). Athens/Berlin/Brussels: Sakkoulas/Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag/Bruylant.Google Scholar
  57. Grabenwarter, C. (2010). National constitutional low relating to the European Union. In A. Bogdandy & J. Bast (Eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (pp. 83–129). Munchen: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  58. Grewe, C. (2009). Constitutions Nationales et droit de l’Union européenne. Rep. Communautaire Dalloz, 152–187.Google Scholar
  59. Häberle, P. (2009). La regresiva “sentencia Lisboa” como “Maastricht-II” anquilosada. Revista de Derecho Constitucional Europeo, 12(6), 397–429.Google Scholar
  60. Herdegen, M., & Morlok, M. (2003). Informalisierung und Entparlamentarisierung politischer Entscheidungen als Gefährdungen der Verfassung?. In VVDStRL (Vol. 62, pp. 7–116). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  61. Hölscheidt, S. (2005). Europäischer Konvent, Europäische Verfassung, Nationale Parlamente. Jahrbuch des Öffentliches Rechts, 429–456.Google Scholar
  62. Hölscheidt, S. (2008). Formale Aufwertung – Geringe Schubkraft: die Rolle der Nationalen Parlamente gemäß dem Lissabonner Vertrag. Integration, 31, 254–265.Google Scholar
  63. Hölscheidt, S. (2011). Art. 12. In E. Grabitz, M. Hilf, & M. Nettesheim (Eds.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union – Kommentar (pp. 1–21). Munchen: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  64. Holzhacker, R. (2005). The power of opposition parliamentary party groups in European Scrutiny. Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3), 428–445.Google Scholar
  65. Hrbek, R. (2012). The role of National Parliaments in the EU. In H.-J. Blanke & S. Mangiameli (Eds.), The European Union after Lisbon. Constitutional basis, economic order and external action (pp. 129–158). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Jacqué, J. P. (2009). Les réformes institutionnelles introduites par le Traité de Lisbonne. In E. Brosset, C. Chevalier-Govers, V. Edjaharian, & C. Schneider (Eds.), Le Traité de Lisbonne. Reconfiguration ou deconstitutionnalisation de l’Union européenne? (pp. 57–73). Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
  67. Jacqué, J. P., & Weiler, J. H. H. (1990). On the road to the European Union. A new judicial architecture: An agenda for the intergovernmental conference. Common Market Law Review, 27(2), 185–207.Google Scholar
  68. Janowski, C. A. (2005). Die Nationalen Parlamente und ihre Europa-Gremien. Legitimationsgarant der EU? Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  69. Kamann, H.-G. (1997). Die Mitwirkung der Parlamente der Mitgliedstaaten an der Europäischen Gesetzgebung. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
  70. Kapteyn, P. J. G., McDonnell, A. M., Mortelmans, K. J. M., Timmermans, C. W. A., & Geelhoed, L. A. (2009). The law of the European Union and the European communities, with references to changes to be made by the Lisbon Treaty (4th ed.). Boston: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  71. Katz, R. S., & Wessels, B. (1999). Introduction. In R. S. Katz & B. Wessels (Eds.), The European Parliament, the national parliaments, and European integration (pp. 3–18). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  72. Kiiver, P. (2006). The national parliaments in the European Union. A critical view on EU constitution-building. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  73. Kiiver, P. (2008). The Treaty of Lisbon, the National Parliaments and the principle of subsidiarity. Maastricht Journal, 15, 77–84.Google Scholar
  74. Kiiver, P. (2011). The early-warning-system for the principle of subsidiarity: The National Parliaments as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe. European Law Review, 36(1), 98–108.Google Scholar
  75. Kiiver, P. (2012). The early warning system for the principle of subsidiarity. Constitutional theory and empirical reality. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Kirchhof, P. (2001). Demokratie ohne parlamentarische Gesetzgebung? Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 55(18), 1332–1334.Google Scholar
  77. Lecheler, H. (2009). Die Mitwirkungsgesetzgebung an der europäischen Integration vor und nach dem Urteil des BVerfG zum Lissabon-Vertrag. Juristen Zeitung, 64(23), 1156–1160.Google Scholar
  78. Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies. Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Linde Paniagua, E. (2004). Los Parlamentos Nacionales y regionales y su implicación en la toma de decisiones en la Unión Europea. Revista de derecho de la Unión Europea, 6, 161–181.Google Scholar
  80. Louis, J.-V. (2009). National parliaments and the principle of subsidiarity – Legal options and practical limits. In I. Pernice & E. Tanchev (Eds.), Ceci n’est pas une Constitution – Constitutionalisation without Constitution? (pp. 132–154). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  81. Mager, U. (2003). Die Prozeduralisierung des Subsidiaritätsprinzip im Verfassungsentwurf des Europäischen Konvents. Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien, 6(4), 471–484.Google Scholar
  82. Maiani, F. (2004). Monitoring the delimitation of EC competences: Some remarks on the current debate’s order of priorities. In R. Miccù & V. Atripaldi (Eds.), The European constitution in the making (pp. 141–152). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  83. Mangiameli, S. (2009). Il ruolo del Parlamento europeo nella PESC, alla luce delle innovazioni apportate dal Trattato di Lisbona. In C. Decaro & N. Lupo (Eds.), Il “dialogo” tra Parlamenti: obiettivi e risultati (pp. 417–432). Rome: Luiss University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Manzella, A. (1999). L’identità costituzionale dell’Unione europea. In A. Pace (Ed.), Studi in onore di Leopoldo Elia (Vol. II, pp. 923–950). Milano: Giuffré.Google Scholar
  85. Manzella, A. (2008). I parlamenti nazionali nella vita dell’Unione. In S. Micossi & G. L. Tosato (Eds.), L’Unione europea nel XXI secolo. “Nel dubbio per l’Europa” (pp. 333–349). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  86. Mastroianni, R. (2010). La procedura legislativa e i parlamenti nazionali: osservazioni critiche. In F. Bassanini & G. Tiberi (Eds.), Le nuove istituzioni europee. Commento al Trattato di Lisbona (2nd ed.). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  87. Matía Portilla, F. J. (2003). Parlamento europeo y parlamentos nacionales: doble legitimidad en el marco de la Unión Europea. Revista de estudios políticos, 119, 191–220. http://www.zaoerv.de/67_2007/67_2007_4_b_1141_1218.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2012.
  88. Maurer, A., & Wessels, W. (Eds.). (2001). National parliaments on their way to Europe: Losers or latecomers? Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  89. Mayer, F. C. (2007). Die Rückkehr der Europäischen Verfassung? Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 67, 1141–1217.Google Scholar
  90. Moravcsik, A. (2002). In defence of the “democratic deficit”. Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–624.Google Scholar
  91. Morviducci, C. (2008). Il ruolo dei Parlamenti nazionali. Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, 1, 83–94.Google Scholar
  92. Moscarini, A. (2006). Il principio di sussidiarietà. In S. Mangiameli (Ed.), L’ordinamento europeo, Vol. II: L’esercizio delle competenze (pp. 153–223). Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
  93. Neri, G. (1998). Il ruolo dei Parlamenti nazionali nel processo normativo dell’Unione europea. In Camera dei Deputati (Ed.), Il Parlamento della Repubblica. Organi, procedure, apparati (pp. 145–178). Rome: Camera dei deputati.Google Scholar
  94. Neunreither, K. (2010). The European parliament and National parliaments: Conflict or cooperation? Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3/4), 466–489.Google Scholar
  95. Ninatti, S. (2004). La formula parlamentare europea dagli esordi al Trattato costituzionale. Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico comunitario, 1395–1430.Google Scholar
  96. Norton, P. (1996). Conclusion: Addressing the democratic deficit. In P. Norton (Ed.), National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 177–193). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  97. O’Brennan, J., & Raunio, T. (Eds.). (2007). National Parliaments within the enlarged European Union: From “victims” of integration to competitive actors. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Oberdorff, H. (2008). Le Parlement français à l’épreuve de la construction européenne? In B. Mathieu (Ed.), 1958–2008. Cinquantième anniversaire de la Constitution française (pp. 715–728). Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
  99. Oeter, S. (2010). Federalism and democracy. In A. von Bogdandy & J. Bast (Eds.), Principles of European constitutional law (pp. 55–82). Portland/Munich: Hart Publishing/C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  100. Orrù, R. (2003). Prospettive di “parlamentarizzazione” dell’Unione: Assemblee nazionali e assemblea europea. Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, 4, 1753–1762.Google Scholar
  101. Passos, R. (2008). Recent developments concerning the role of national parliaments in the European Union. ERA-Forum, 9, 25–40.Google Scholar
  102. Perez, R. (2011). L’azione finanziaria europea nel tempo della crisi. Rivista Italiana di Diritto pubblico comunitario, 21(5), 1043–1055.Google Scholar
  103. Pernice, I. (2008–2009). The Treaty of Lisbon: Multilevel constitutionalism in action. The Columbia Journal of European Law, 15, 349–407.Google Scholar
  104. Pernice, I., & Hindelang, S. (2010). Potenziale europäischer Politik nach Lissabon – Europapolitische Perspektiven für Deutschland, seine Institutionen, seine Wirtschaft und seine Bürger. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 21(11), 407–413.Google Scholar
  105. Petrangeli, F. (2003). Sussidiarietà e Parlamenti nazionali: evitare la confusione istituzionale. Quaderni costituzionali, 1, 173–175.Google Scholar
  106. Piris, J. C. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty. A legal and political analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Pitruzzella, G. (2012). Chi governa la finanza pubblica in Europa? Quaderni costituzionali, 32(1), 9–49.Google Scholar
  108. Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (Eds.). (2005). The presidentialization of politics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  109. Poniatowski, M. (1992). Le principe de subsidiarité. Rapport d’information. Paris: Sénat-Delegation pour les Communautés européennes.Google Scholar
  110. Porchia, O. (2010). La sussidiarietà attraverso il riordino delle competenze? Il Trattato di riforma e la ripartizione competenziale. In J. Woelk & P. Bußjäger (Eds.), Il Trattato di Lisbona e le Regioni: il controllo di sussidiarietà (pp. 21–50). Bolzano: Eurac Research.Google Scholar
  111. Raunio, T. (2004). Two steps forward, one step behind? National Legislatures in the EU constitution (Paper of the Federal Trust for Education and Research, London). http://www.fedtrust.co.uk/uploads/constitution/raunio.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2010.
  112. Raunio, T. (2007). The Finnish Eduskunta: Effective scrutiny, partisan consensus. In O. Tans, C. Zoethout, & J. Peters (Eds.), National Parliaments and European Democracy. A bottom-up approach to European constitutionalism (pp. 23–45). Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
  113. Rideau, J. (1996). National parliaments and the European parliament – Cooperation and conflict. In E. Smith (Ed.), National Parliaments as cornerstones of European integration (pp. 159–178). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  114. Riis, P. (2007). National Parliamentary Control of EU Decision-making in Denmark. In O. Tans, C. Zoethout, & J. Peters (Eds.), National Parliaments and European Democracy. A bottom-up approach to European constitutionalism (pp. 185–202). Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
  115. Ritzer, C., & Ruttlof, M. (2006). Die Kontrolle des Subsidiaritätsprizips: Geltende Rechtlage und Reformperspektiven. Europarecht, 41(1), 116–137.Google Scholar
  116. Rivosecchi, G. (2003). La funzione di controllo parlamentare tra Parlamento europeo e Parlamenti nazionali. In Quaderni della Rassegna di Diritto pubblico europeo, I, Studi sulla Costituzione europea. Percorsi e ipotesi (pp. 289–304). Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
  117. Ruffert, M. (2002). Entformalisierung und Entparlamentarisierung politischer Entscheidungen als Gefährdungen der Verfassung? Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt, 117(17), 1145–1154.Google Scholar
  118. Ruffert, M. (2011a). Die europäische Schuldenkrise vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht Anmerkung zum Urteil vom 7. September 2011. Europarecht, 842–855.Google Scholar
  119. Ruffert, M. (2011b). The European debt crisis and European Union Law. Common Market Law Review, 48(6), 1777–1806.Google Scholar
  120. Saalfeld, T. (2005). Deliberate delegation or abdication? Government backbenchers, Ministers and European Union legislation. Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3/4), 343–371.Google Scholar
  121. Sander, F. (2006). Subsidiarity infringements before the European Court of Justice: Futile interference with politics or a substantial step towards EU federalism? The Columbia Journal of European Law, 12, 517–572.Google Scholar
  122. Saulnier, E. (2002). La participation des parlements français et britannique aux communautés et à l’Union européenne. Lecture parlementaire de la construction européenne. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.Google Scholar
  123. Saulnier-Cassia, E. (2009). Art. 88-6. In F. Luchaire, G. Conac, & X. Prétot (Eds.), La Constitution de la République française. Analyse et commentaires (pp. 1971–1983). Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  124. Sauron, J.-L. (2008). Le nouveau role des Parlements nationaux après le Traité de Lisbonne. Gazette du Palais, (171).Google Scholar
  125. Schmidt, V. A. (1999). European “federalism” and its encroachments on National Institutions. Publius, 29(1), 19–44.Google Scholar
  126. Schmidt-Radefeldt, R. (2009). Die parlamentarische Dimension der Europäischen Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik – Pluralität von demokratischer Legitimation in einer europäischen Mehrebenendemokratie. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 4, 773–787.Google Scholar
  127. Schmitter, P. (2000). How to democratize the European Union – and why bother. Lanham-Md: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  128. Schütze, R. (2009). Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the safeguards of federalism? Cambridge Law Journal, 68(3), 525–536.Google Scholar
  129. Shirvani, F. (2010). Die europäische Subsidiaritätsklage und ihre Umsetzung ins deutsche Recht. Juristen Zeitung, 65(15), 753–759.Google Scholar
  130. Sicardi, S. (2007). Il problematico rapporto tra (vecchia e nuova) Unione europea e Parlamenti nazionali: integrazione o contrapposizione? In Associazione italiana dei costituzionalisti (Ed.), Annuario 2005 – L’integrazione dei sistemi costituzionali europeo e nazionali, Atti del XX Convegno Annuale – Catania, 14-15 ottobre 2005 (pp. 27–101). Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  131. Sleath, W. (2007). The role of National Parliaments in European Affairs. In G. Amato, H. Bribosia, & B. De Witte (Eds.), Genèse et destine de la Constitution européenne. Commentaire au Traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe à la lumière des travaux préparatoires et perspectives d’avenir (pp. 545–564). Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
  132. Tans, O. (2007a). Introduction. National parliaments and the European Union; In search of a common ground. In O. Tans, C. Zoethout, & J. Peters (Eds.), National Parliaments and European Democracy. A bottom-up approach to European constitutionalism (pp. 3–17). Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
  133. Tans, O. (2007b). Conclusion. National Parliaments and the European Union. Coping with the limits of democracy. In O. Tans, C. Zoethout, & J. Peters (Eds.), National Parliaments and European Democracy. A bottom-up approach to European constitutionalism (pp. 227–250). Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
  134. Thiele, A. (2010). Das Rechtsschutzsystem nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon – (K)ein Schritt nach vorn? Europarecht, 45(1), 30–50.Google Scholar
  135. Thym, D. (2005). Parlamentsfreier Raum? Das Europäische Parlament in der Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik (Walter Hallstein-Institut-Paper 2/2005). www.whi-berlin.de/documents/whi-paper0205.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2010.
  136. Thym, D. (2011). Anmerkung. Juristen Zeitung, 20, 1011–1015.Google Scholar
  137. Uerpmann-Wittzack, R. (2009). Frühwarnsystem und Subsidiaritätsklage im deutschen Verfassungssystem. Europäische Grundrechtezeitschrift, 36, 461–468.Google Scholar
  138. Uerpmann-Wittzack, R., & Edenharter, E. (2009). Subsidiaritätsklage als parlamentarisches Minderheitsrecht? Europarecht, 44(3), 313–329.Google Scholar
  139. Van der Schyff, G., & Leenknegt, G.-J. (2007). The case for a European Senate: A model for the representation of National parliaments in the European Union. Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 62, 237–258.Google Scholar
  140. Vecchio, F. (2009). Il principio di sussidiarietà nel Trattato costituzionale: procedimentalizzazione vs. giustizi abilità. In E. Castorina (Ed.), Profili attuali e prospettive di diritto costituzionale europeo (pp. 170–183). Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  141. Verola, N. (2006). L’Europa legittima. Florence: Passigli Editori.Google Scholar
  142. Villani, U. (2009). L’impatto del Trattato di Lisbona sul ruolo dei Parlamenti Nazionali. In C. Decaro & N. Lupo (Eds.), Il “dialogo” tra parlamenti: obiettivi e risultati (pp. 407–413). Rome: Luiss University Press.Google Scholar
  143. Violini, L. (2003). I Parlamenti nazionali come fattori di incremento del principio democratico e come garanti del rispetto del principio di sussidiarietà. In Quaderni della Rassegna di Diritto pubblico europeo, I, Studi sulla Costituzione europea. Percorsi e ipotesi (pp. 269–288). Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
  144. von Bogdandy, A. (2005). Parlamentarismus in Europa: eine Verfalls- oder Erfolgsgeschichte? Archiv für Öffentliches Recht, 130, 445–464.Google Scholar
  145. von Bogdandy, A., & Bast, J. (2010). The federal order of competences. In A. von Bogdandy & J. Bast (Eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (2nd ed., pp. 275–307). Portland/Munich: Hart Publishing/C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  146. Wagner, W. (2009). Die parlamentarische Kontrolle der europäischen Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik. In S. Kadelbach (Ed.), Europäische Integration und parlamentarische Demokratie (pp. 157–169). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  147. Weatherill, S. (2003). Using National Parliaments to improve scrutiny of the limits of EU action. European Law Review, 28, 909–912.Google Scholar
  148. Weber, A. (2010). Europäische Verfassungsvergleichung. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  149. Weber, A. (2011). Europäisches Parlament und nationale Parlamente im Europäischen Rechtsetzungsverbund. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 64, 497–504.Google Scholar
  150. Wechsler, H. (1954). The political safeguards of federalism: The role of the states in the composition and selection of the National Government. Columbia Law Review, 54, 543–560.Google Scholar
  151. Weiler, J. H. H. (1999). The constitution of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  152. Woelk, J. (2010). Il controllo di sussidiarietà: freno d’emergenza o nuovo canale per un dialogo istituzionale? In J. Woelk & P. Bussjäger (Eds.), Il Trattato di Lisbona e le Regioni: il controllo di sussidiarietà (pp. 11–21). Bolzano: Eurac Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
    • 1
  • Stelio Mangiameli
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty for Economics, Law and Social ScienceUniversity of ErfurtErfurtGermany
  2. 2.National Research Council Institute for Regionalism, Federalism and Self-GovernmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations