Article 9 [The Principle of Equality and Citizenship of the Union]

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
  • Stelio Mangiameli


In all its activities, 4 the Union shall observe the principle of the equality 7–16 of its citizens, who shall receive equal attention 5,6 from its institutions, bodies, offices and agencies. 4 Every national of a Member State 29–37 shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship 17–25 of the Union shall be additional 38–42 to and not replace national citizenship.


Equal Treatment Democratic Principle Union Citizenship Equal Concern National Citizenship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Table of Cases

  1. ECJ 25.05.1971, 80/70, Gabrielle Defrenne v Belgian State, ECR 445 [cit. in para 10]Google Scholar
  2. ECJ 20.02.1979, 120/78, Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein (‘Cassis de Dijon’), ECR 649 [cit. in para 13]Google Scholar
  3. ECJ 13.07.1989, 5/88, Hubert Wachauf v Bundesamt für Ernährung und Forstwirtschaft, ECR 2609 [cit. in para 7]Google Scholar
  4. ECJ 08.11.1990, C-177/88, Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV-Centrum) Plus, ECR I-3941[cit. in para 10]Google Scholar
  5. ECJ 18.06.1991, C-260/89, Elliniki Radiophonia Tiléorassi AE and Panellinia Omospondia Syllogon Prossopikou v Dimotiki Etairia Pliroforissis and Sotirios Kouvelas and Nicolaos Avdellas and others (ERT), ECR I-2925 [cit. in para 7]Google Scholar
  6. ECJ 07.07.1992, C-369/90, Mario Vicente Micheletti and others v Delegación del Gobierno en Cantabria, ECR I-4239 [cit. in para 31]Google Scholar
  7. ECJ, 30.11.1995, C-55/94, Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano ECR I-4165 [cit. in para 13]Google Scholar
  8. ECJ 26.06.1997, C-368/95, Vereinigte Familiapress Zeitungsverlags- und vertriebs GmbH v Heinrich Bauer Verlag ECR I-3689 [cit. in para 7]Google Scholar
  9. ECJ 12.05.1998, C-85/96, María Martínez Sala v Freistaat Bayern, ECR I-2691 [cit. in para 13]Google Scholar
  10. ECJ 24.11.1998, C-274/96, Criminal proceedings against Horst Otto Bickel and Ulrich Franz, ECR I-7637 [cit. in para 31]Google Scholar
  11. ECJ 11.11.1999, C-179/98, Belgian State v Fatna Mesbah, ECR I-7955 [cit. in para 31]Google Scholar
  12. ECJ 20.02.2001, C-192/99, The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte: Manjit Kaur, ECR I-1237 [cit. in para 31]Google Scholar
  13. ECJ 20.09.2001, C-184/99, Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre public d’aide sociale d’Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, ECR I- 6193 [cit. in para 9; 49; 51]Google Scholar
  14. ECJ 11.07.2002, C-224/98, Marie-Nathalie D’Hoop v Office national de l’emploi ECR I-6191 [cit. in para 49]Google Scholar
  15. ECJ 17.09.2002, C-413/99, Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ECR I-7091 [cit. in para 49; 51]Google Scholar
  16. ECJ 02.10.2003, C-148/02, Carlos Garcia Avello v Belgian State, ECR I-11613 [cit. in para 31; 49]Google Scholar
  17. ECJ 29.04.2004, C-224/02, Heikki Antero Pusa v Osuuspankkien Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö, ECR I-5763 [cit. in para 49]Google Scholar
  18. ECJ 19.10.2004, C-200/02, Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ECR I-9925 [cit. in para 31; 37; 49; 51]Google Scholar
  19. ECJ 12.07.2005, C-403/03, Egon Schempp v Finanzamt München, ECR I-6421 [cit. in para 31; 49]Google Scholar
  20. ECJ 12.09.2006, C-145/04, Kingdom of Spain v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [cit. in para 31; 44]Google Scholar
  21. ECJ 12.09.2006, C-300/04, M. G. Eman and O. B. Sevinger v College van burgemeester en wethouders van Den Haag [cit. in para 31; 44]Google Scholar
  22. ECJ 16.12.2008, C-524/06, Heinz Huber v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ECR I-9705 [cit. in para 49]Google Scholar
  23. ECJ 02.03.2010, C-135/08, Janko Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern, ECR I-1449 [cit. in para 9; 32–34; 37; 49; 55]Google Scholar
  24. ECJ 08.05.2011, C-34/09, Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm) [cit. in para 37; 49; 51]Google Scholar
  25. ECJ 05.04.2011, C-108/10, Scattolon v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca [cit. in para 7]Google Scholar
  26. ECJ 05.05.2011, C-434/09, McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department [cit. in para 53]Google Scholar
  27. ECJ 15.11.2011, C-256/11, Murat Dereci et al. v Bundesministerium für Inneres [cit. in para 7; 54]Google Scholar


  1. Alexy, R. (2000). A theory of constitutional rights. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, M. (2007). Civic citizenship and migrant integration. Environment People Law, 13(2), 311–333.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, M. (2010). Irregular migrants: Beyond the limits of solidarity? In M. Ross & Y. Borgmann-Prebil (Eds.), Promoting solidarity in the European Union (pp. 151–165). Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, M. (2011). The principle of equal treatment: Widening and deepening. In P. Craig & G. De Búrca (Eds.), The evolution of EU Law (2nd ed., pp. 611–640). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  5. Bellamy, R. (2008). Evaluating Union citizenship: Belonging, rights and participation within the EU. Citizenship Studies, 12(6), 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgmann-Prebil, Y. (2008). The rule of reason in European citizenship. European Law Journal, 14(3), 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calliess, C., & Ruffert, M. (Eds.). (2011). EUV/AEUV. Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta. Kommentar. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  8. Chalmers, D., Davies, G., & Monti, G. (2010). European Union law (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cuesta Lopez, V. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty's provisions on democratic principles: A legal framework for participatory democracy. European Public Law, 16(1), 123–138.Google Scholar
  10. De Waele, H. (2010). EU citizenship: Revisiting its meaning, place and potential. European Journal of Migration and Law, 12(3), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dougan, M. (2006). The constitutional dimension to the case law on Union citizenship. European Law Review, 31(5), 613–641.Google Scholar
  12. Dougan, M. (2008). The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: Winning minds not hearts. Common Market Law Review, 45(3), 617–703.Google Scholar
  13. Dougan, M., & Spaventa, E. (2005). Wish you weren’t here! New models of social solidarity in the European Union. In M. Dougan & E. Spaventa (Eds.), Social welfare and EU law (pp. 180–208). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Duff, A. (2005). The struggle for Europe’s constitution. London: Federal Trust.Google Scholar
  15. Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  16. Egger, A. (2006). EU-fundamental rights in the national legal order: The obligations of Member States revisited. Yearbook of European Law, 25(1), 515–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elsmore, M., & Starup, P. (2007). Union citizenship – background, jurisprudence, and perspective – the past, present, and future of law and policy. Yearbook of European Law, 26(1), 57–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eriksen, E. O., & Fossum, J. E. (2011). Bringing European democracy back in – or how to read the German Constitutional Court’s Lisbon Treaty ruling. European Law Journal, 17(2), 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grabitz, R., Hilf, M., & Nettesheim, M. (2011). Das Recht der Europäischen Union, loose leaf. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  20. Halleskov, L. (2005). The long-term residents directive: A fulfilment of the Tampere objective of near-equality? European Journal of Migration and Law, 7, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heilbronner, K., & Thym, D. (2011). Case commentary on Ruiz Zembrano. Common Market Law Review, 48(4), 1253–1270.Google Scholar
  22. Horspool, M. (2012). The concept of citizenship in the European Union. I. In H.-J. Blanke & S. Mangiameli (Eds.), The European Union after Lisbon. Constitutional basis, economic order and external action (pp. 279–294). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobs, F. (2001). Human rights in the EU: The role of the Court of Justice. European Law Review, 26(4), 331–341 et seqq.Google Scholar
  24. Jacqué, J. P. (2002). La Charte des droits fundamentaux de l’Union européenne: aspects juridiques généraux. Revue Européenne de Droit Public, 14(1), 107–126.Google Scholar
  25. Jessurun d’Oliveira, H. U. (1994). European citizenship: Its meaning, its potential. In R. Dehousse (Ed.), Europe after Maastricht: An ever closer union? (pp. 126–148). Munich: Law Books in Europe.Google Scholar
  26. Kadelbach, S. (2009). Citizenship rights in Europe. In D. Ehlers (Ed.), European fundamental rights and freedoms (pp. 541–574). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  27. Kochenov, D. (2010a). The puzzle of citizenship and territory in the EU: On European rights overseas. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 17(3), 230–251.Google Scholar
  28. Kochenov, D. (2010b). Rounding up the circle: The mutation of Member States’ nationalities under pressure from EU citizenship (EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2010/23).Google Scholar
  29. Kohler-Koch, B., & Ritterberger, B. (2006). The ‘Governance Turn’ in EU studies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(1), 27–49.Google Scholar
  30. Lenaerts, K., & Gutiérrez-Fons, J. (2010). The constitutional allocation of powers and general principles of EU law. Common Market Law Review, 47(6), 1629–1669.Google Scholar
  31. Margiotta, C., & Vonk, O. (2010). Nationality law and European citizenship: The role of dual nationality (EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2010/66).Google Scholar
  32. Nettesheim, M. (2011). Der “Kernbereich” der Unionsbürgerschaft – vom Schutz der Mobilität zur Gewährung eines Lebensumfelds. Juristen Zeitung, 66(21), 1030–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Keeffe, D. (1994). Union citizenship. In D. O’Keeffe, & P. Twomey (Eds.), Legal issues of the Maastricht Treaty (pp. 87–108 et seqq). Chichester: Chancery Law Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Perchinig, B. (2006). EU citizenship and the status of Third Country Nationals. In R. Bauböck (Ed.), Migration and citizenship: Legal status, rights and political participation (IMISCOE Reports, (pp. 67–82 et seqq). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rawls, J. (1973). A theory of justice. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  36. Reh, C. (2009). The Lisbon Treaty: De-constitutionalizing the European Union? Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(3), 625–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruzié, D. (1993). Nationalité, effectivité et droit communautaire. Revue générale de droit international public, 107–120.Google Scholar
  38. Schrauwen, A. (2008, March). The Future of EU Citizenship: Corrosion of national citizenship?. Conference paper Birmingham. Accessed 1 Mar 2012.
  39. Shaw, J. (2007). The transformation of citizenship in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Accessed 1 March 2012).Google Scholar
  40. Shaw, M. (2008). International law (6th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaw, J. (2011). Citizenship: Contrasting dynamics at the interface of integration and constitutionalism (EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/60).Google Scholar
  42. Snell, J. (2010). The notion of market access: A concept or a slogan? Common Market Law Review, 47(2), 437–472.Google Scholar
  43. Spaventa, E. (2004). From Gebhard to Carpenter: Towards a (non-)economic European constitution. Common Market Law Review, 41(3), 743–773 et seqq.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hermann-Josef Blanke
    • 1
  • Stelio Mangiameli
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty for Economics, Law and Social ScienceUniversity of ErfurtErfurtGermany
  2. 2.National Research Council Institute for Regionalism, Federalism and Self-GovernmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations