Advertisement

Turing Revisited: A Cognitively-Inspired Decomposition

  • Tarek Richard Besold
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 5)

Abstract

After a short assessment of the idea behind the Turing Test, its actual status and the overall role it played within AI, I propose a computational cognitive modeling-inspired decomposition of the Turing test as classical “strong AI benchmark” into at least four intermediary testing scenarios: a test for natural language understanding, an evaluation of the performance in emulating human-style rationality, an assessment of creativity-related capacities, and a measure of performance on natural language production of an AI system. I also shortly reflect on advantages and disadvantages of the approach, and conclude with some hints and proposals for further work on the topic.

Keywords

General Intelligence Human Rationality Phrase Structure Grammar Natural Language Understanding Imitation Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Besold, T.R.: Rationality in/through/for AI. In: Romportl, J., Ircing, P., Zackova, E., Schuster, R., Polak, M. (eds.) Proceedings of Extended Abstracts Presented at the International Conference Beyond AI 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Besold, T.R., Gust, H., Krumnack, U., Abdel-Fattah, A., Schmidt, M., Kühnberger, K.: An Argument for an Analogical Perspective on Rationality & Decision-Making. In: van Eijck, J., Verbrugge, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Reasoning About Other Minds: Logical and Cognitive Perspectives (RAOM-2011), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Groningen, The Netherlands, vol. 751, CEUR-WS.org (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bishop, M., Preston, J. (eds.): Essays on Searle’s Chinese Room Argument. Oxford University Press (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brachman, R.: (AA)AI - More than the Sum of its Parts. AI Magazine 27(4), 19–34 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cassell, J.: More than just another pretty face: Embodied conversational interface agents. Communications of the ACM 43(4), 70–78 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chomsky, N.: Reflections on Language. Pantheon Books (1975)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen, P.: If Not Turing’s Test, Then What? AI Magazine 26(4) (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colby, K.: Modeling a paranoid mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4(4), 515–534 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colton, S., Lopez de Mantaras, R., Stock, O.: Computational Creativity: Coming of Age. AI Magazine 30(3), 11–14 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elman, J.: Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14, 179–211 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fellbaum, C.: WordNet and wordnets. In: Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, pp. 665–670. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferrucci, D., Brown, E., Chu-Carroll, J., Fan, J., Gondek, D., Kalyanpur, A., Lally, A., Murdock, J., Nyberg, E., Prager, J., Schlaefer, N., Welty, C.: Building Watson: An Overview of the DeepQA Project. AI Magazine 31(3), 59–79 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., Sag, I.: Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Blackwell, Malden (1985)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilboa, I.: Questions in decision theory. Annual Reviews in Economics 2, 1–19 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harnad, S.: Other bodies, other minds: A machine incarnation of an old philosophical problem. Minds and Machines 1, 45–54 (1991)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harnad, S.: Minds, Machines and Turing. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9(4), 425–445 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harnad, S.: The Annotation Game: On Turing (1950) on Computing, Machinery, and Intelligence. In: The Turing Test Sourcebook: Philosophical and Methodological Issues in the Quest for the Thinking Computer. Klewer (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hauser, L.: Searle’s Chinese Box: Debunking the Chinese Room Argument. Minds and Machines 7, 199–226 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lewis, J., Elman, J.: Learnability and the statistical structure of language: Poverty of stimulus arguments revisited. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loebner, H.: The Loebner Prize. Official homepage of the Loebner Prize Competition, (queried July 28, 2011), http://www.loebner.net/Prizef/loebner-prize.html
  21. 21.
    Moor, J. (ed.): The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mueller, S.T.: Is the Turing Test Still Relevant? A Plan for Developing the Cognitive Decathlon to Test Intelligent Embodied Behavior. In: 19th Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference, MAICS (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pollard, C., Sag, I.: Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Studies in Contemporary Linguistics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pollock, J.: Twenty Epistemological Self-profiles: John Pollock (Epistemology, Rationality and Cognition). In: A Companion to Epistemology, pp. 178–185. John Wiley and Sons (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schmidhuber, J.: Formal theory of creativity, fun, and intrinsic motivation (1990-2010). IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 2(3), 230–247 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Searle, J.: Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3), 417–457 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shieber, S.: Lessons from a restricted Turing Test. Communications of the ACM 37, 70–78 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trebek, A., Barsocchini, P., Griffin, M.: The Jeopardy! Book. Harper Perennial (1990)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tsourikov, V.: Inventive machine: Second generation. AI & Society 7, 62–77 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Turing, A.: Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind LIX (236), 433–460 (1950)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, P., Goertzel, B.: Introduction: Aspects of Artificial General Intelligence. In: Goertzel, B., Wang, P. (eds.) Advances in Artificial General Intelligence: Concepts, Architectures and Algorithms - Proceedings of the AGI Workshop 2006, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 157, pp. 1–16. IOS Press (2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weizenbaum, J.: ELIZA - a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM 9(1), 36–45 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Cognitive ScienceUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations