Advertisement

The Influence of Engineering Theory and Practice on Philosophy of AI

  • Viola Schiaffonati
  • Mario Verdicchio
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 5)

Abstract

Ever since the early days of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the complexity of its relationship with philosophy has been under observation. Some devoted their efforts to a systematic foundation of philosophy of AI, taking for granted its placement within philosophy of science. Such endeavors were based on the view of AI as a scientific discipline, primarily aimed at answering questions about the nature of intelligence. Thus, it was natural to consider philosophy of AI, like philosophy of physics and of biology, as part of philosophy of science. We believe, however, that this position must be reconsidered today in the light of the issues recently tackled by AI and of the emergence of new fields of analysis: philosophy of technology and philosophy and engineering. In this paper we analyze how the view of AI as engineering influences philosophy of AI. Moreover, we argue that philosophy of AI, under this influence, can contribute to the foundation of the emerging philosophy of engineering.

Keywords

Software Agent Bidding Strategy General Problem Solver Auction House Seller Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Proceedings of “WPE 2008” (Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering), Royal Academy of Engineering, London (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akman, V.: Introduction to the special issue on philosophical foundations of artificial intelligence. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12, 247–250 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amigoni, F., Schiaffonati, V.: Models, simulation, and computer experiments. In: Magnani, L., Carnielli, W., Pizzi, C. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology, pp. 198–215. Springer (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boden, M.: The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen, P.R.: Empricial methods for artificial intelligence. MIT Press (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colburn, T. (ed.): Philosophy and Computer Science. M.E. Sharpe (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cummins, R., Pollock, J.: Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Epstein, J.M., Axtell, R.L.: Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. MIT Press (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fox Keller, E.: Good experimental methodologies and simulation in autonomous mobile robotics. In: Radder, H. (ed.) The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, pp. 315–332. Pittsburgh University Press (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hacking, I.: Representing and Intervening. Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press (1983)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hartmann, S.: The world as a process: simulation in the natural and social sciences. In: Hegselmann, R., et al. (eds.) Simulation and Modeling in the Social Sciences Form the Philosophy of Science Point of View, pp. 77–100. Kluwer (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Humphreys, P.: Extending Ourselves. Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. Oxford University Press (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kephart, J.O., Hanson, J.E., Greenwald, A.R.: Dynamic pricing by software agents. Computer Networks 32(6), 731–752 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kitcher, P.: Real realism: The Galileian strategy. Philosophical Review 110, 151–197 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCarthy, J.: What has ai in common with philosophy? In: Proceedings of 14th Intenational Joint Congress on AI, Montreal, Canada (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCarthy, J., Minsky, M.L., Rochester, N., Shannon, C.E.: Proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. Technical report, Dartmouth College (1955)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: GPS, a program that simulates human thought. In: Billing, H. (ed.) Lernende Automaten, pp. 109–124, R. Oldenbourg (1961)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nilsson, N.J.: Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rohrlich, F.: Computer simulation in the physical sciences. In: Fine, A., Forbes, M., Wessels, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1990 Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 145–163 (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schiaffonati, V.: A framework for the foundation of the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Minds and Machines 13, 537–552 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schiaffonati, V.: From philosophy of science to philosophy of engineering: The case of ai. In: Proceedings of “WPE 2008” (Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering), Royal Academy of Engineering, London (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sloman, A.: A philosophical encounter. In: Proceedings of 14th International Joint Congress on AI, Montreal, Canada (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van de Poel, I., Goldberg, D.E. (eds.): Philosophy and Engineering: An Emerging Agenda. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winsberg, E.: Simulated experiments: Methodology for virtual world. Philosophy of Science 70, 105–125 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Winsberg, E.: Models of success vs. success of models: Reliability without truth. Synthese 152(1), 1–19 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Università degli Studi di BergamoBergamoItaly

Personalised recommendations