“Computational Ontology and Deontology”

  • Raffaela Giovagnoli
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 5)

Abstract

I’ll discuss an interesting argument from the recent book of John Searle Making the Social World (Oxford 2010) that tries to consider the construction of a society as an “engineering” problem and concludes that deontology works against the “computational” or “algorithmic” view of consciousness. I’ll introduce the notion of “consciousness” and the sense in which Searle uses the term (1); I’ll sketch Searle’s argument against the computational model (2) and I’ll criticize Searle’s reasons to warrant his criticism and I try to introduce a “compatibilist” view of human and artificial minds (3).

Keywords

Ontology deontology consciousness computationalism free will autonomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Searle, J.R.: Consciousness. Annual Review Neurosciences 23, 557–578 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Searle, J.R.: Intentionality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Searle (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Searle, J.R.: Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3h, 417–457 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Searle, J.R.: Consciousness and Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Searle, J.R.: Making the Social World. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Searle (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Searle (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Searle (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Searle (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giovagnoli, R.: Autonomy. A Matter of Content. Firenze University Press, Firenze (2007); Haselagen, W.: Robotics, Philosophy and the Problem of Autonomy. Pragmatics & Cognition 13(3) (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brandom, R.: Between Saying & Doing. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brandom (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brandom (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brandom (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brandom (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brandom, R.: Making It Explicit. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brandom (1994)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brandom (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brandom (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carter, M.: Minds and Computers, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2007); Evans, R.: The Logical Form of Status-Function Declarations. In: Giovagnoli, R. (ed.) Prelinguistic Practice, Social Ontology and Semantic. Etica & Politica/Ethics & Politics (2009), www.units.it/etica/; Evans, R.: Introducing Exclusion Logic as a Deontic Logic. In: Governatori, G., Sartor, G. (eds.) DEON 2010. LNCS, vol. 6181, pp. 179–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2010); Giovagnoli, R.: On Brandom’s “Logical Functionalism”. The Reasoner 4(3) (2010), www.thereasoner.org Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raffaela Giovagnoli
    • 1
  1. 1.Pontifical Lateran UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations