Practical Introspection as Inspiration for AI

Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 5)

Abstract

AI has progressed less than other fields of information technology due to a conceptual impasse. Though much effort has been employed to overcome this situation, often it has been from a restricted point-of-view e.g. philosophy alone or algorithms alone. This paper argues for (and exemplifies) an inter-disciplinary tactic for advancing the field of AI that integrates introspection with programming. The paper has two parts: The first outlines an introspective approach that has been largely overlooked and answers some of the (rather heated) arguments that have caused introspection to be sidelined. The second part offers a practical application of this approach - presented as an algorithm.

Keywords

Reinforcement Learn Case Base Reasoning Middle Ground Random Action Relevant Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boden, M.A.: Mind as Machine. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Dreyfus, H.L.: What Computers Can’t Do: The Limit of Artificial Intelligence. Harper, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  3. Dreyfus, H.L.: Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. Artificial Intelligence 71, 1137–1160 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freed, S.: Controller with artificial intelligence based on selection from episodic memory and corresponding methods US Patent Application No. 20110060425 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Hay, B., Nance, K.: Forensics examination of volatile system data using virtual introspection. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 42(3), 74–82 (2008), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1368506.1368517, doi:10.1145/1368506.1368517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heidegger, M.: Being And Time (Translated by Macquarrie & Robinson). Blackwell, Oxford (1962)Google Scholar
  7. Hoyningen-Huene, P., Schickore, J., Steinle, F., Buchwald, J.Z.: Context of Discovery Versus Context of Justification and Thomas Kuhn. Archimedes 14, III, 119–131 (2006), doi:10.1007/1-4020-4251-5_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Libet, B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W., Pearl, D.K.: Time of Conscious Intention to Act in relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (readiness-potential). Brain 106(3), 623–642 (1982), doi: 10.1093/brain/106.3.623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McCorduck, P.: Machines Who Think. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco (1979)Google Scholar
  10. Moore, J.L., Sleeman, D.: Enhancing PIXIE’s tutoring capabilities. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 28(6), 605–623 (1988), doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(88)80063-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Communications of the ACM (1976), doi:10.1145/360018.360022Google Scholar
  12. Pacherie, E., Haggard, P.: What are Intentions? In: Nadel, L., Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (eds.) Conscious Will and Responsibility. A tribute to Benjamin Libet, pp. 70–84. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Snow, C.P.: The two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press, New York (1961)Google Scholar
  14. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  15. Solomonoff, R.J.: The search for artificial intelligence. Electronics and Power (1968), doi:10.1049/ep.1968.0004Google Scholar
  16. Watson, J.B.: Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review 20(2), 158–177 (1913), doi:10.1037/h0074428CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of InformaticsUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations