Design of a Four-Annulus Integrated Disk Electrode for Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy Measurement

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 180)

Abstract

In order to study the relationships between pork quality and the BIS of porcine tissues, a novel four-annulus integrated disk (FAID) electrode was designed and manufactured. The contrastive measurement experiments on two fresh isolated animal tissues, namely porcine underback and porcine liver using the FAID electrode were performed. The results show that the impedance amplitude-frequency characteristics and phase-frequency characteristics of the two kinds of tissues have significant differences. The Cole-Cole parameters fitting are then performed using the measured BIS data. The fitting results show that the arrangement of the BIS data on the complex plane is in good concordance with the Cole-Cole plot respectively, and the extracted results, R0, R∞, α and ƒC, also indicate the difference between the two tissues.

Keywords

bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy pork quality four-annulus integrated disk electrode Cole-Cole model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Passauer, J., Petrov, H., Schleser, A., Leicht, J., Pucalka, K.: Evaluation of clinical dry weight assessment in haemodialysis patients using bioimpedance spectroscopy: a cross-sectional study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. October 6, (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tonkovic, S., Tonkovic, I., Kovacic, D.: Bioelectric impedance analysis of lower leg ischaemic muscles. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 1, pp. 757–760 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gonzalez-Correa, C.A., Brown, B.H., Smallwood, R.H., Stephenson, T.J., Stoddard, C.J., Bardhan, K.D.: Low frequency electrical bioimpedance for the detection of inflammation and dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Physiol. Meas 24, 291–296 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whitman, T.A., Forrest, J.C., Morgan, M.T., Okos, M.R.: Electrical measurement for detecting early postmortem changes in porcine muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 74, 80–90 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Altmann, M., Pliquett, U., Suess, R., von Borell, E.: Prediction of lamb carcass composition by impedance spectroscopy. J. Anim. Sci. 82, 816–825 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Palko, T., Bialokoz, F., Weglarz, J.: Multifrequency device for measurement of the complex electrical bio-impedance-design and application. In: Proceedings of the First Regional Conference in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1995 and 14th Conference of the Biomedical Engineering Society of India. An International Meeting, pp. 1/45–1/46. IEEE (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Songer, J.: Tissue ischemia monitoring using impedance spectroscopy: Clinical evaluation. M.S. thesis of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in USA (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aaron, R., Huang, M., Shiffman, C.A.: Anisotropy of human muscle via non-invasive impedance measurements. Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 1245–1262 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seoane, F., Lindecrantz, K., Olsson, T., Kjellmer, I., Flisberg, A., Bagenholm, R.: Spectroscopy study of the dynamics of the transencephalic electrical impedance in the perinatal brain during hypoxia. Physiol. Meas. 26, 849–863 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones, D.M., Smallwood, R.H., Hose, D.R., Brown, B.H., Walker, D.C.: Modelling of epithelial tissue impedance measured using three different designs of probe. Physiological Measurement 24, 605–623 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Osterman, K.S., Hoopes, P.J., DeLorenzo, C., Gladstone, D.J., Paulsen, K.D.: Non-invasive assessment of radiation injury with electrical impedance spectroscopy. Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 665–683 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nebuya, S., Noshiro, M., Brown, B.H., Smallwood, R.H., Milnes, P.: Detection of emboli in vessels using electrical impedance measurements—phantom and electrodes. Physiological Measurement 26, S111 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paulson, K.S., Pidcock, M.K., McLeod, C.N.: A probe for organ impedance measurement. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51, 1838–1844 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kun, S., Ristic, B., Peura, R.A., Dunn, R.M.: Real-time extraction of tissue impedance model parameters for electrical impedance spectrometer. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37, 428–432 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Faes, T.J.C., van der Meij, H.A., de Munck, J.C., Heethaar, R.M.: The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies. Physiological Measurement 20, R1–R10 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Optoelectronic EngineeringXi’an Technological UniversityXi’an CityChina

Personalised recommendations