Organisational Participation in Open Innovation Communities

Chapter

Abstract

Organisational participation is a critical consideration in the examination of open communities. Many open communities are no longer the domain of solitary individuals but have come to include organisations representing many of the largest financial interests across a variety of economic interests. Organisations seek to participate in open communities for reasons of leveraged development, economics and flexibility but participation is not a simple task. In this chapter, we explore what the primary motivations are for organisational participation in open communities. We follow this with considerations of how organisations participate once they have determined to engage with open communities. This chapter provides a glimpse of why and how organisations participate in open innovation communities and provide insights valuable for both practical and academic interests.

Keywords

Open Community Community Participant Illustrative Quote Participant Type Strategic Motivation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ågerfalk, P., Fitzgerald, B., & Slaughter, S. (2009). Introduction to the special issue, flexible and distributed information systems development: state of the art and research challenges. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksulu, A., & Wade, M. (2011). A comprehensive review and synthesis of open source research. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 11, 576–656.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organisational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organisation Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyle, J. (2006). Mertonianism unbound? imagining free, decentralised access to most cultural and scientific material. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a common: from theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chiasson, M., Germonprez, M., & Mathiassen, L. (2009). The conventional role of research methods in information systems action research. Information Systems Journal, 19, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crowston, K., Wei, K., Li, Q. & Howison, J. (2006). Core and Periphery in Free/Libre and Open Source Software Team Communications, In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6, 118a.Google Scholar
  8. Davison, R., & Martinsons, M. (2002). Empowerment or enslavement? A case of process-based change in Hong Kong. Information Technology & People, 15(1), 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, B. (2006). The transformation of open source software. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 587–598.Google Scholar
  10. Gambardella, A., & Hall, B. (2006). Proprietary versus public domain licensing of software and research projects. Research Policy, 35, 875–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Germonprez, M., Hovorka, D., & Collopy, F. (2007). A theory of tailorable technology design. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 8(6), 315–367.Google Scholar
  12. Henkel, J. (2006). Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded linux. Research Policy, 35(7), 953–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelty, C. (2009). Two bits: The cultural significance of free software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kuk, G. (2006). Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Organisation Science, 52(7), 1031–1042.Google Scholar
  15. Lakhani, K., & Wolf, R. (2005). Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, & K. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, A., & Baskerville, R. L. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathiassen, L., Chiasson, M., & Germonprez, M. (2009). Compositional styles in action research: a critical analysis of leading information systems journals sprouts. Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(35).Google Scholar
  18. Neus, A., & Scherf, P. (2005). Opening minds: cultural change with the introduction of open-source collaboration methods. IBM Systems Journal, 44(2), 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sowe, S., Stamelos, I., & Angelis, L. (2008). Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: an empirical study. The Journal of Systems and Software, 81(3), 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Triole, J., & Lerner, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 52, 197–234.Google Scholar
  21. von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the ‘private-collective innovation model: issues for organisation science. Organisation Science, 14(2), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. West, J., & Lakhani, K. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry & Innovation, 15(2), 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Lee, G., & Cole, R. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux Kernel Development. Organisation Science, 14(6), 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lerner, J., & Schankerman, M. (2010). The comingled code: Open source and economic development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Torker, R., Minoves, P., & Garrigós, J. (2011). Adopting free/libre/open source software practices, techniques and methods for industrial use. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 88–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nebraska at OmahaOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Linux FoundationSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations