Skip to main content

How Open Is Open Innovation? Considering, Adapting and Adopting User Knowledge and Competence in the Solution Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2671 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a longitudinal study of an open, co-created, innovation—ICA Student. It illustrates some of the challenges inherent in the consideration, adaptation and adoption of user knowledge and competence throughout an open innovation process, demonstrating the involvement of users both during the phases of content generation and commercialisation. Findings from the study illustrate five important issues for managers and practitioners to address when co-creating an innovation with future users: (1) the framing of an open innovation; (2) the identification of suitable participants; (3) the absorption and use of diverse inputs; (4) innovation entails both content generation and commercialisation and (5) the realisation that consideration, adaptation and adoption of knowledge and competence will affect the solution space. We conclude the chapter with a discussion on the relative openness of open innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R. J., et al. (2011). Value propositions as communication practice: Taking a wider view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010a). Users as innovators: A review critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010a). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen, L. B., & Fredriksen, L. (2006). Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organisation Science, 17(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen, L. B., & Molin, M. J. (2003). Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 363–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S., & von Hippel, E. (2002). Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Business Review, 80(4), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should i share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • For readers interested in the co-creation of innovation and value, we suggest the following work:

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010b). Users-as-innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36, 857–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010b). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39, 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidhagen, M., Ridell-Persson, O., & Sörhammar, D. (2011). The orchestrating firm: Value creation in the video game industry. Managing Service Quality, 21, 392–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1993). Designing interactive strategy: From value chain to value constellations (pp. 65–77). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2008). “Service dominant logic: Continuing the evolution”. Journal of the Academy and Market Science, 36, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Persson Ridell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ridell, O.P., Röndell, J.G., Sörhammar, D. (2013). How Open Is Open Innovation? Considering, Adapting and Adopting User Knowledge and Competence in the Solution Space. In: Eriksson Lundström, J., Wiberg, M., Hrastinski, S., Edenius, M., Ågerfalk, P. (eds) Managing Open Innovation Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31650-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics