Open Service Innovation in Health Care: What Can We Learn from Open Innovation Communities?

Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of the chapter is to describe and discuss how principles from open innovation, which are primarily derived from commercial product development, could be applied to open service innovation in non-profit health care organisations. To evaluate the drivers, barriers and prerequisites of such innovation, we performed an explorative study consisting of interviews with two rheumatologists, engaged in a Swedish research project on open innovation in health care. According to the interviews, the main driver was considered to be “the empowered patient”, holding a good knowledge of his or her disease. Barriers to open innovation were the lack of meeting places for patients, a strong local variation in how health care services are delivered and an organisational culture which does not promote learning and innovations. It is necessary for health care organisations to change their current culture of closed innovation, implying that only physicians have valid knowledge about patients’ diseases. Other necessary prerequisites for implementing open innovation principles are support from management and structures of financial control which encourage innovations. This explorative study is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to combine principles of open innovation and health care services.

Keywords

Health Care Service Innovation System Open Innovation Health Care Organisation Innovation Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ågerfalk, P., & Fitzgerald, B. (2008a). Outsourcing to an unknown workforce: Exploring opensourcing as a global sourcing strategy. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 385–409.Google Scholar
  2. Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2006). Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(5), 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2007). Toward more user-centric OD: Lessons from the field of experience-based design and a case study. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 43(1), 4–66.Google Scholar
  4. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.Google Scholar
  5. Chu, T. H., & Robey, D. (2008). Explaining changes in learning and work practice following the adoption of online learning: A human agency perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dougherty, D., & Conway, P. H. (2008). The “3 T’s” road map to transform US health care: The “how” of high quality care. Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), 299(19), 2319–2321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasselbladh, H., & Bejerot, E. (2007). Webs of knowledge and circuits of communication: Constructing rationalized agency in Swedish health care. Organisation, 14(2), 175–200.Google Scholar
  8. Munos, B. (2006). Can open-source R&D reinvigorate drug research? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. doi: 10.1038/nrd2131.
  9. Ovretveit, J. (1992). Health service quality: An introduction to quality methods for health services. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Press.Google Scholar
  10. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Pickles, J., & Hide, E. (2008). Experience based design: A practical method of working with patients to redesign services. Clinical Governance: An International Journal, 13(1), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Talaga, P. (2009). Editorial: Open innovation: share or die. Drug Discovery Today, 14(21/22), 1003–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vetter, G. R. (2009). Slouching toward open innovation: Free and open source software for electronic health information. Journal of Law & Policy, 30, 179–259.Google Scholar
  14. von Hippel, E. (2001). Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 82–86.Google Scholar
  15. von Krogh, G. (2003). Open-source software development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 14–18.Google Scholar
  16. Walsh, K. (2007). Understanding what works—and why—in quality improvement: the need for theory-driven evaluation. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(2), 57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ågerfalk, P., & Fitzgerald, B. (2008b). Outsourcing to an unknown workforce: Exploring opensourcing as a global sourcing strategy. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 385–409.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Keller
    • 1
  • Mats Edenius
    • 2
  • Staffan Lindblad
    • 3
  1. 1.Högskolan i Jönköping, IHH, InformatikJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of Informatics and MediaUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.Karolinska InstitutetSolnaSweden

Personalised recommendations