Skip to main content

Clinically Relevant Study End Points in Rectal Cancer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Early Gastrointestinal Cancers

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 196))

Abstract

In rectal cancer currently there are no clearly validated early end points which can serve as surrogates for long-term clinical outcome such as local control and survival. However, the use of a variety of response rates (i.e. pathological complete response, downsizing the primary tumor, tumor regression grade (TRG), radiological response) as endpoints in early (phase II) clinical trials is common since objective response to therapy is an early indication of activity. Disease-free survival (DFS) has been proposed as the most appropriate end point in adjuvant trials and is one of the most frequently used in newer rectal cancer trials. Due to the devastating nature of local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer, local control (which is itself a subset of the overall DFS endpoint) is still considered an important endpoint. Recently, circumferential resection margin (CRM) has been proposed as novel early end point because the CRM status can account for effects on DFS and overall survival after chemoradiation, radiation (RT), or surgery alone. Consensus is needed to define the most appropriate end points in both early and phase III trials in locally advanced cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S et al. (2011) Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29:2773–2780

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro B, Fiorucci C, Tebala C et al (2009) Locally advanced rectal cancer: mr imaging in prediction of response after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Radiology 250:730–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo HL et al. (2007) Trends in the use and role of biomarkers in phase I oncology trials. Clin Cancer Res 13(22):6719 Nov 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Biomarkers Definitions Working Group (2001) Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnetain F, Bosset J, Gerard J et al. (2011) An analysis of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5FU/leucovorin for T3-4 rectal cancer on survival in a pooled analysis of EORTC 22921 and FFCD 9203 trials: surrogacy in question? J Clin Oncol 29(suppl; abstr 3506)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosset JF, Calais J, Mineur L et al (2005) Enhanced tumorocidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: preliminary results—EORTC 22921. J Clin Oncol 23:5620–5627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzourene H, Bosman FT, Seelentag W (2002) Importance of tumor regression assessment in predicting the outcome in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma who are treated with preoperative radiotherapy. Cancer 94:1121–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Kepka L et al. (2005) Postoperative complications in patients irradiated pre-operatively for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial. Comparing short-term radiotherapy vs chemoradiation. Colorectal Dis 7:410–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Bujko K, Nowacki M, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A et al (2006) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 93:1215–1223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bujko K, Glynne-Jones R, Bujko M (2010) Does adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy provide a benefit for patients with resected rectal cancer who have already received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy? A systematic review of randomised trials. Ann Oncol 21(9):1743–1750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burzykowski T, Buyse M, Yothers G (2008) Exploring and validating surrogate endpoints in colorectal cáncer. Lifetime Data Anal 14:54–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capirci C, Valentini V, Cionini L et al (2008) Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term analysis of 566 ypCR patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:99–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chari RS, Tyler DS, Anscher MS et al (1995) Preoperative radiation and chemotherapy in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 221:778–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty R, Gill P, Govender D et al. (2012) A multi-centre pathologist survey on pathological processing and regression grading of colorectal cancer resection specimens treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Virchows Arch Jan 13. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancey JE et al (2010) Biomarker studies in early clinical trials of novel agents guidelines for the development and incorporation of novel agents. Clin Cancer Res 16:1745–1755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dworak O, Kelholz L, Hoffman A (1997) Pathological feature of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:19–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhauer EA (1998) Phase I and II trials of novel anti-cancer agents: endpoints, efficacy and existentialism. The Michel clavel lecture, held at the 10th NCI-EORTC conference on new drugs in cancer therapy. Ann Oncol 9:1047–1052. Amsterdam, 16–19 Jun 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Martos C, Aparicio J, Bosch C Et al. (2004) Preoperative uracil, tegafur, and concomitant radiotherapy in operable rectal cancer: a phase II study with 3 years follow-up. J Clin Oncol

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Martos C, Safont M, Feliu J et al. (2010) Induction chemotherapy with or without chemoradiation in intermediate-risk rectal cancer patients defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a GEMCAD study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 28:Abstr TPS 196

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Martos C, Estevan R, Salud A et al. (2012) Neoadjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B) in intermediate-risk rectal cancer (RC) patients defined by magnetic resonance (MR): GEMCAD 0801 trial. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 3586)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F et al (2006) Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3–4 rectal cancers. Results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol 24:4620–4625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S et al. (2010) Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2.J ClinOncol 28:1638–1644

    Google Scholar 

  • Geus-Oei L, Vriens L, van Laarhoven H et al (2009) Monitoring and predicting response to therapy with 18F-FDG PET in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Nucl Med 50:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynne-Jones R, Anyamene N (2006) Just how useful an endpoint is complete pathological response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(2):319–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glynne-Jones R, Mawdsley S, Pearce T et al (2006) Alternative clinical end points in rectal cancer—are we getting closer? Ann Oncol 17:1239–1248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guillem J, MD Moore H, Akhurst T et al (2004) Sequential preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography assessment of response to preoperative chemoradiation: a means for determining longterm outcomes of rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 199:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LL, Sargent DJ, Tepper JE et al (2004) Impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 22:1785–1796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W et al (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240:711–717

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofheinz R, Wenz R, Post S et al. (2011) Capecitabine (Cape) versus 5-fluorouracil–based (neo)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29 (suppl; abstr 3504)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liersch T, Langer C, Ghadimi M et al (2006) Lymph node status and TS gene expression are prognostic markers in stage II/III rectal cancer after neoadjuvant fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 24:4062–4068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maas M, Nelemans P, Valentini V et al (2010) Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 11:835–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maas M, Beets-Tan R, Lambregts D et al (2011) Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4633–4640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madelon PJ et al (2010) A systematic methodology review of phase I radiation dose escalation trials. Radiother Oncol 95:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Methy N, Bedenne L, Conroy T et al (2010) Surrogate end points for overall survival and local control in neoadjuvant rectal cancer trials: statistical evaluation based on the FFCD 9203 trial. Ann Oncol 21:518–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagtegaal I, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CAM, Klein Kranenbarg E et al (2002) Circumferential margin is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: Not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ngan S, Fisher R, Goldstein D et al (2010) TROG, AGITG, CSSANZ, and RACS. A randomized trial comparing local recurrence (LR) rates between short-course (SC) and long-course (LC) preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for clinical T3 rectal cancer: an intergroup trial (TROG, AGITG, CSSANZ, RACS) [abstract no. 3509]. J Clin Oncol 28(15 Suppl.):3509

    Google Scholar 

  • Onaitis MW, Noone RB, Fields R et al (2001) Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer does not influence survival. Ann Surg Oncol 8:801–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel U, Taylor F, Blomqvist L et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging–detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol 29:3753–3760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters KCMJ, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID et al (2007) The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 246:693–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF et al (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inade- quate surgical resection: Histopathological study of lateral tumor spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T et al (2005) Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8688–8696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roedel C et al. (2011) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus 5-fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: first results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial. ASCO annual meeting abstract no: LBA3505

    Google Scholar 

  • Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O’Connell MJ et al (2009) Pre-operative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum (NSABP-R-03). J Clin Oncol 27:5124–5130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roh MS, Yothers GA, O’Connell MJ et al. (2011) The impact of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-04. J Clin Oncol 29 (suppl; abstr 3503)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent D, Wieand H, Haller D et al (2005) Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 23:8664–8670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent D, Shi Q, Yothers G et al (2011) Two or three year disease-free survival (DFS) as a primary end-point in stage III adjuvant colon cancer trials with fluoropyrimidines with or without oxaliplatin or irinotecan: data from 12,676 patients from MOSAIC, X-ACT, PETACC-3, C-06, C-07 and C89803. Eur J Cancer 47(7):990–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1731:351–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S et al. (2011) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. Proc ASCO 29:225 s (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrag MR, Weiser KA, Goodman KA et al (2010) Neoadjuvant FOLFOX-bev, without radiation, for locally advanced rectal cancer [abstract no. 3511]. J Clin Oncol 28(15 Suppl.):3511

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R et al (2009) Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicenter, randomised trial. Lancet 373:811–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seiwert TY, Salama JK, Vokes EE (2007) The concurrent chemoradiation paradigm–general principles. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4:86–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper J, O’Connell M, Niedzwiecki D et al (2002) Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control—final report of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol 20:1744–1750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper J, Wang A (2010) Improving local control in rectal cancer: radiation sensitizers or radiation dose? J Clin Oncol 1:1623–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentini V, Coco C, Picciocchi A et al (2002) Does downstaging predict improved outcome after preoperative chemoradiation for extraperitoneal locally advanced rectal cancer? A long-term analysis of 165 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53(3):664–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio F, Valentini V, Minsky B et al (2005) The relationship of pathologic tumor regression grade (trg) and outcomes after preoperative therapy in rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62(3):752–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler JM, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ et al (2002) Quantification of histologic regression of rectal cancer after irradiation. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1051–1056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Fernandez-Martos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fernandez-Martos, C., Guerrero, A., Minsky, B. (2012). Clinically Relevant Study End Points in Rectal Cancer. In: Otto, F., Lutz, M. (eds) Early Gastrointestinal Cancers. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31629-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31629-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31628-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31629-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics