Advertisement

‘Club Convergence’: Geography, Externalities and Technology

  • Stilianos Alexiadis
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The previous chapter has examined club convergence in the context of the EU-27 regions, thus providing an alternative perspective on the issue of regional convergence in an enlarged Europe. While previous studies on European regions claim that convergence is slow, the empirical tests reported on Chap. 6 establish that convergence is a property that characterises the regions of the ‘old’ member-states of the European Union together with a selected set of regions located in new member-states.

Keywords

Technology Adoption Spatial Interaction Regional Convergence Absolute Convergence Employment Share 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abramovitz M (1986) Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind. J Econ Hist 46(2):385–406Google Scholar
  2. Acosta P (2010) The ‘flypaper effect’ in presence of spatial interdependence: evidence from Argentinean municipalities. Ann Reg Sci 44(3):453–466Google Scholar
  3. Alderman N, Fischer M (1992) Innovation and technological change: an Australian comparison. Environment and Planning A 24(2):273–288Google Scholar
  4. Alexiadis S (2010a) Regional convergence clubs and dynamic externalities. Ital J Reg Sci 9(1):41–64Google Scholar
  5. Alexiadis S, Korres G (2009) Technology adoption and spatial interaction: evidence from the European regions. In: Markowski T, Turała M, Żuber P (eds) Innovation and space – European and national approach. pp 24–42Google Scholar
  6. Alexiadis S, Korres G (2010) Adoption of technology and regional convergence in Europe. European Spatial Research and Policy 17(2):94–105Google Scholar
  7. Alonso-Villar O, Chammoro-Rivas J, Gonzáles-Cerdeira X (2004) Agglomeration economies in manufacturing industry: the case of Spain. Appl Econ 36(18):2103–2116Google Scholar
  8. Andonelli C (1990) Induced adoption and externalities in the regional diffusion of innovation technology. Reg Stud 24(1):31–40Google Scholar
  9. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. KluwerGoogle Scholar
  10. Anselin L (2004) Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(2):153–166Google Scholar
  11. Anselin L, Bera A (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah A, Giles D (eds) Handbook of applied economic statistics. pp 237–289Google Scholar
  12. Anselin L, Florax R (1995) Small sample properties of tests for spatial dependence in regression models: some further results. In: Anselin L, Florax R (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. pp 21–74Google Scholar
  13. Anselin L, Bera A, Florax R, Yoon M (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26(1):77–104Google Scholar
  14. Arbia G, Paelinck J (2003) Spatial econometric modelling of regional convergence in continuous time. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(3):342–362Google Scholar
  15. Audretsch D, Feldman M (1996a) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86(3):630–640Google Scholar
  16. Audretsch D, Feldman M (1996b) Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organisation 11(2):253–273Google Scholar
  17. Baldwin R (1999) Agglomeration and endogenous capital. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):253–280Google Scholar
  18. Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1997) Technology diffusion, convergence and growth. J Econ Growth 2(1):1–25Google Scholar
  19. Baumol W (1967) Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. Am Econ Rev 57(3):415–426Google Scholar
  20. Baumol W, Wolff E (1988) Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: A reply. Am Econ Rev 78(5):1155–1159Google Scholar
  21. Beine M, Hecq A (1998) Co-dependence and convergence in the EC economies. J Policy Model 20(4):403–426Google Scholar
  22. Bernat G (1996) Does manufacturing matter? A spatial econometric view of Kaldor’s laws. J Reg Sci 36(3):463–477Google Scholar
  23. Bertinelli L, Black D (2004) Urbanisation and growth. J Urban Econ 56(1):80–96Google Scholar
  24. Bode E (2004) The spatial pattern of localised R&D spillovers: An empirical investigation for Germany. J Econ Geogr 4(1):43–64Google Scholar
  25. Braunerhjelm P, Borgman B (2004) Geographical concentration, entrepreneurship and regional growth: Evidence from regional data in Sweden, 1975–99. Reg Stud 38(8):929–947Google Scholar
  26. Breschi S (2000) The geography of innovation: A cross-sector analysis. Reg Stud 34(3):213–229Google Scholar
  27. Camagni R, Capello R (2009) Knowledge-base economy and knowledge creation: the role of space. In: Fratesi U, and Senn L (eds) Growth and innovation of competitive regions: the role of internal and external connections. pp 145–165Google Scholar
  28. Cardoso A (1993) Regional inequalities in Europe – have they really been decreasing? Appl Econ 25(8):1093–1100Google Scholar
  29. Carlino G (1978) Economies of scale in manufacturing location: theory and measure. Martinus Nijhoff, LeindenGoogle Scholar
  30. Carlino G (1980) Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh reconsidered. Urban Stud 17(3):343–351Google Scholar
  31. Carlino G (1982) Manufacturing agglomeration economies as returns to scale: a production function approach. Papers in Regional Science 50(1):95–108Google Scholar
  32. Carlino G (1987) Comparisons of agglomeration: or what Chinitz really said: a reply. Urban Stud 24(1):75–76Google Scholar
  33. Chatterji M (1992) Convergence clubs and endogenous growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 8(4):57–69Google Scholar
  34. Cheshire P, Carbonaro G (1995) Convergence-divergence in regional growth rates: an empty black box? In: Armstrong H, Vickerman R (eds) Convergence and divergence among European regionsGoogle Scholar
  35. Cheshire P, Carbonaro G (1996) Urban economic growth in Europe: testing theory and policy prescriptions. Urban Stud 33(7):1111–1128Google Scholar
  36. Ciccone P, Hall R (1995) Productivity and density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 86(1):54–70Google Scholar
  37. Corrado L, Martin R, Weeks M (2005) Identifying and interpreting regional convergence clusters across Europe. Econ J 115(502):C133–C160Google Scholar
  38. D’Uva M, Siano R (2007) Human capital and ‘club convergence’ in Italian regions. Econ Bull 18(1):1–7Google Scholar
  39. De la Fuente A (1997) The empirics of growth and convergence: a selective review. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21(1):23–73Google Scholar
  40. De la Fuente A (2000) Convergence across countries and regions: theory and empirics. European Investment Bank Papers 5(2):25–45Google Scholar
  41. De Vor F, de Groot H (2010) Agglomeration externalities and localized employment growth: the performance of industrial sites in Amsterdam. Ann Reg Sci 44(3):409–431Google Scholar
  42. Doloreux D, Dionne S (2008) Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 20(3):259–283Google Scholar
  43. Durlauf S, Johnson P (1995) Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. Journal of Applied Econometrics 10(4):365–384Google Scholar
  44. Dyson K (2000) EMU as Europeanization: convergence, diversity and contingency. Journal of Common Market Studies 38(4):645–666Google Scholar
  45. Elhorst J (2010) Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis 5(1):9–28Google Scholar
  46. Enders W (1995) Applied econometric time series. WileyGoogle Scholar
  47. European Commission (1999) Sixth period report on the social and economic situation of the regions of the EU. Official Publication Office, LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
  48. Fagerberg J (1987) A technology-gap approach to why growth rates differ. Res Policy 16(2–4):87–99Google Scholar
  49. Fagerberg J (1988) International Competitiveness. Econ J 98(391):355–374Google Scholar
  50. Fagerberg J (1996) Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12(3):39–51Google Scholar
  51. Fagerberg J, Verspagen B, Caniëls M (1997) Technology, growth and unemployment across European regions. Reg Stud 31(5):457–466Google Scholar
  52. Fatás A (1997) EMU: countries or regions? Lessons from EMS experience. Eur Econ Rev 41(3–5):743–751Google Scholar
  53. Fingleton B (1999) Spurious spatial regression: some Monte Carlo results with spatial unit root and spatial cointegration. J Reg Sci 39(1):1–19Google Scholar
  54. Fingleton B (2001) Theoretical economic geography and spatial econometrics: dynamic perspectives. J Econ Geogr 1(2):201–225Google Scholar
  55. Fischer M, Stirböck C (2006) Pan-European regional income growth and club convergence. Ann Reg Sci 40(4):693–721Google Scholar
  56. Ford T, Logan B, Logan J (2009) NAFTA or nada? Trade’s impact on US border retailers. Growth and Change 40(2):260–286Google Scholar
  57. Fothergill S, Gudgin G (1982) Unequal growth: urban and regional employment change in the United Kingdom. HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  58. Funke M, Niebuhr A (2005) Regional geographic research and development spillovers and economic growth: evidence from West Germany. Reg Stud 39(1):143–153Google Scholar
  59. Glaeser E, Kallal H, Scheinkman J, Schleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Pol Econ 100(6):1126–1152Google Scholar
  60. Gordon I, McCann P (2005) Innovation, agglomeration and regional development. J Econ Geogr 5(5):523–543Google Scholar
  61. Goschin Z, Constantin D, Roman M, Ileanu B (2009) Specialisation and concentration in the Romanian economy. J Appl Quant Methods 4(1):95–111Google Scholar
  62. Griffith R, Redding S, Simpson H (2009) Technological catch-up and geographical proximity. J Reg Sci 49(4):689–720Google Scholar
  63. Gripaios P, Bishop P, Keast S (2000) Differences in GDP per-head in GB counties: some suggested explanations. Appl Econ 32(9):1161–1167Google Scholar
  64. Henderson V (1996) Ways to think about urban concentration: neoclassical urban systems versus the new economic geography. Int Reg Sci Rev 19(1–2):31–36Google Scholar
  65. Henderson V (1997) Externalities and industrial development. J Urban Econ 42(3):449–470Google Scholar
  66. Henderson V (2003a) Marshall’s scale economies. J Urban Econ 53(1):1–28Google Scholar
  67. Henderson V, Zmarak S, Venables A (2001a) Geography and development. J Econ Geogr 1(1):81–105Google Scholar
  68. Hirschman A (1962) Economic development, research and development, policy making: some converging views. Behav Sci 7(2):211–224Google Scholar
  69. Huggins R, Johnston A (2009) Knowledge networks in an uncompetitive region: SME innovation and growth. Growth and Change 40(2):227–259Google Scholar
  70. Isard W (1956) Location and space economy. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  71. Isserman A (1977) The location quotient approach to estimating regional economic impacts. J Am Inst Plann 43:33–41Google Scholar
  72. Jaffe A, Trujtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108(3):577–598Google Scholar
  73. Ketenci N, McCann P (2009) Regional restructuring and manufacturing firm performance in a Central-Asian transitions economy: observations from Kazakhstan. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences 2(1):11–21Google Scholar
  74. Leigh R (1970) The use of location quotients in urban economic base studies. Land Econ 48(2):202–206Google Scholar
  75. Lopez-Bazo E, Vaya E, Artis M (2004) Regional externalities and growth: evidence from European Regions. J Reg Sci 44(1):43–73.Google Scholar
  76. Lucio J, Herce J, Goicolea A (2002) The effects of externalities on productivity growth in Spanish industry. Reg Sci Urban Econ 32(2):241–258Google Scholar
  77. Malecki E (2007) cities and regions competing in the global economy: knowledge and local development policies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25(5):638–654Google Scholar
  78. Marginson P, Sisson K (2002) European integration and industrial relations: a case of convergence and divergence? Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4):671–692Google Scholar
  79. Marjit S, Beladi H (1998) Product versus process patents: a theoretical approach. J Policy Model 20(2):193–199Google Scholar
  80. Martin P (1998) Can regional policies affect growth and geography in Europe? World Economy 21(7):757–774Google Scholar
  81. Maurseth P (2001) Convergence, geography and technology. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 12(3):247–276Google Scholar
  82. Mayer W, Pleeter S (1975) A theoretical justification for the use of location quotients. Reg Sci Urban Econ 5(3):343–355Google Scholar
  83. McDonald J (1989) On the estimation of localisation economies. Econ Lett 29(3):275–277Google Scholar
  84. Mion G (2004) Spatial externalities and empirical analysis: the case of Italy. J Urban Econ 56(1):97–118Google Scholar
  85. Moomaw R (1988) Agglomeration economies: localisation or urbanisation? Urban Stud 25(2):150–161Google Scholar
  86. Moomaw R (1998) Agglomeration economies: are they exaggerated by industrial aggregation? Reg Sci Urban Econ 28(2):199–211Google Scholar
  87. Morgan K (2004) The exaggerated death of geography: learning proximity and territorial innovation systems. J Econ Geogr 4(1):3–21Google Scholar
  88. Moulaer F, Seria F (2003) Territorial innovation models: a critical survey. Reg Stud 37(3):289–302Google Scholar
  89. Mulas-Granados C, Sanz I (2008) The dispersion of technology and income in Europe: evolution and mutual relationship across regions. Res Policy 37(5):836–848Google Scholar
  90. Mullen J, Williams M (1990) Explaining TFP differentials in urban manufacturing. J Urban Econ 28(1):103–123Google Scholar
  91. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kunter M (1990) Applied linear statistical models, 3rd edn. IrwinGoogle Scholar
  92. Neven D, Gouyette C (1995) Regional convergence in the European Community. Journal of Common Market Studies 33(1):47–65Google Scholar
  93. Norcliffe G (1983) Using location quotients to estimate the economic base and trade flows. Reg Stud 17(3):161–168Google Scholar
  94. Pace K (1997) Performing large spatial regressions and autoregressions. Econ Lett 54(3):283–291Google Scholar
  95. Paci R, Pigliaru F (1997) Structural change and convergence: an Italian regional perspective. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 8(3):297–318Google Scholar
  96. Paci R, Usai S (2000a) Technological enclaves and industrial districts. An analysis of the regional distribution of innovative activity in Europe. Reg Stud 34(2):97–114Google Scholar
  97. Paci R, Usai S (2000b) Externalities, knowledge spillovers and the spatial distribution of innovation. GeoJournal 49(4):381–390Google Scholar
  98. Peri G, Urban D (2006) Catching-up to foreign technology? Evidence on the Veblen-Gerschenkron effect of foreign investment. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36(1):72–98Google Scholar
  99. Piergiovanni R, Santarelli E (2001) Patents and the geographic localisation of R&D spillovers in French manufacturing. Reg Stud 35(8):697–702Google Scholar
  100. Pigliaru F (2003) Detecting technological catch-up in economic convergence. Metroeconomica 54(2–3):161–178Google Scholar
  101. Plummer P, Taylor M (2001a) Theories of local economic growth: Part 1: Concepts, models and measurements. Environment and Planning A 33(2):219–236Google Scholar
  102. Plummer P, Taylor M (2001b) Theories of local economic growth: Part 2: Model specification and empirical validation. Environment and Planning A 33(3):385–398Google Scholar
  103. Puga D (2002) European regional policies in the light of recent location theories. J Econ Geogr 2(4):373–406Google Scholar
  104. Rey S, Montouri B (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Reg Stud 33(2):143–156Google Scholar
  105. Ricci L (1999) Economic geography and comparative advantage: agglomeration versus specialisation. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):357–377Google Scholar
  106. Richardson H (1973a) Regional growth theory. MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  107. Richardson H (1973b) Urban economics. PenguinGoogle Scholar
  108. Richardson H (1978a) Regional and urban economics. PenguinGoogle Scholar
  109. Rigby D, Essletzbichler J (2002) Agglomeration economies and productivity differences in US cities. J Econ Geogr 2(4):407–432Google Scholar
  110. Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  111. Sala-i-Martin X (1996a) Regional cohesion: evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40(6):1325–1352Google Scholar
  112. Schaefer G (1977) The urban hierarchy and the urban area production function: a synthesis. Urban Stud 14(3):315–326Google Scholar
  113. Segal D (1976) Are there returns to scale in city size? Rev Econ Stat 58(3):339–350Google Scholar
  114. Siano R, D’Uva M (2006) Club Convergence in European Union. Appl Econ Lett 13(9):569–574Google Scholar
  115. Simmie J (2003) Innovation and urban regions as national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge. Reg Stud 37(6–7):607–620Google Scholar
  116. Smith H (2000) Innovation systems and ‘local difficulties’: the Oxfordshire experience. In: Acs (ed) Regional innovation, knowledge and global change. pp 72–88Google Scholar
  117. Soete L (1981) A general test of technological-Gap trade theory. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 117(4):638–660Google Scholar
  118. Sveikauskas L, Cowdy J, Funk M (1988) Urban productivity: city size or industry size? J Reg Sci 28(2):185–202Google Scholar
  119. Tödtling F, Trippl M (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differential regional innovation policy approach. Res Policy 34(8):1203–1219Google Scholar
  120. Varga A, Schalk H (2004) Knowledge spillovers, agglomeration and macroeconomic growth: an empirical approach. Reg Stud 38(8):977–989Google Scholar
  121. Verspagen B (1991) A new theoretical approach to catching up and falling behind. Structural change and Economic Dynamics 2(2):359–380Google Scholar
  122. Verspagen B (1992) Endogenous innovation in neoclassical growth models: a survey. Journal of Macroeconomics 14(4):631–662Google Scholar
  123. Verspagen B (1995) Convergence in the global economy: a broad historical perspective. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 6(2):143–165Google Scholar
  124. Wagner J (2000) Regional economic diversity: action, concept, or state of confusion. J Reg Anal Policy 30(2):1–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stilianos Alexiadis
    • 1
  1. 1.Ministry of Rural Development and FoodsAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations