• Stilianos Alexiadis
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


A major concern for regional economists is whether regional per-capita incomes tend to converge or diverge over the long-run, and whether such trends apply to all or only limited groups of economies. This latter possibility is known as ‘club convergence’ and provides a realistic and detailed picture about regional growth (Fischer and Stirböck 2006). The notion of club convergence was originally introduced by Baumol (1986) in recognition of convergence within a subset of national economies. As Baumol and Wolff (1988, p. 1159) subsequently noted, however, “just how countries achieve membership in the convergence club, and on what basis they are sometimes ejected” is a difficult question to answer.


Spatial Interaction Regional Convergence Regional Disparity European Economic Community Cohesion Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abramovitz M (1986) Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind. J Econ Hist 46(2):385–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azariadis C, Drazen A (1990) Threshold externalities in economic development. Q J Econ 105(2):501–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth, 2nd edn. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumol W (1988) Is entrepreneurship always productive? J Dev Plann 18:85–93Google Scholar
  5. Baumol W, Nelson R, Wolf E (eds) (1994) Convergence of productivity – cross-national studies and historical evidence. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Button K, Pentecost E (1999) Regional economic performance within the European union. Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman K, Walker D (1988) Industrial location: principles and policies. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornwall J (1976) Diffusion, convergence and Kaldor’s laws. Econ J 86(342):307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De la Fuente A (2002) On the sources of convergence: a closer look at the Spanish regions. Eur Econ Rev 46(3):569–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durlauf S, Johnson P (1995) Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. Journal of Applied Econometrics 10(4):365–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ertur C, Koch W (2005) Une analyse exploratoire des disparités régionales dans l’Europe elargie. Région et Développement 21:65–92Google Scholar
  12. European Commission (2006a) The demographic future of Europe – from challenge to opportunity. COM (2006) 571, Final, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission (2007b) Cohesion policy 2007–2013. EC, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans A (1986) Comparisons of agglomeration: or what Chinitz really said. Urban Stud 23(5):387–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans P, Karras G (1996a) Convergence revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics 37(2):249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fagerberg J, Verspagen B (1996) Heading for divergence? Regional growth in Europe reconsidered. Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3):431–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer M, Stirböck C (2006) Pan-European regional income growth and club convergence. Ann Reg Sci 40(4):693–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guerrero D, Seró M (1997) Spatial distribution of patents in Spain: determining factors and consequences on regional development. Reg Stud 31(4):381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mancha-Novarro T, Garrido-Yserte R (2008) Regional policy in the European Union: the cohesion-competitiveness dilemma. Reg Sci Pol Pract 1(1):47–66Google Scholar
  20. Rey S, Montouri B (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Reg Stud 33(2):143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stilianos Alexiadis
    • 1
  1. 1.Ministry of Rural Development and FoodsAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations