Describing and Assessing Image Descriptions for Visually Impaired Web Users with IDAT
People with visual impairments, particularly blind people face alot of difficulties browsing the web with assistive technologies such as screen readers, when websites do not conform to accessibility standards and are thus inaccessible. HTML is the basic language for website design but its ALT attribute on the IMG element does not adequately capture comprehensive image semantics and description in a way that can be accurately interpreted by screen readers, hence blind people do not usually get the complete description of the image. Most of the problems however arise from web designers and developers not including a description of an image or not comprehensively describing these images to people with visual impairments. In this paper, we propose the use of the Image Description Assessment Tool (IDAT), a Java-based tool containing some proposed heuristics for assessing how well an image description matches the real content of the image on the web. The tool also contains a speech interface which can enable a visually impaired individual to listen to the description of an image that has been uploaded unto the system.
KeywordsResource Description Framework Disable People Assistive Technology Weighting Score Image Description
The authors would like to thank the Department of Computer Science, University of Hull, UK for funding that enabled this research to be carried out and presented. Many thanks to the anonymous reviewers of this paper for their comments and to Shawulu H. Nggada for his insightful comments on refining and improving IDAT.
- 1.Petrie, H., Harrison, C., Dev, S.: Describing images on the web: a survey of current practice and prospects for the future. In: Universal Access in HCI: Exploring New Dimensions of Diversity, Vol. 8, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, 22–27 July 2005, Las Vegas, Nevada). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (2005)Google Scholar
- 2.Baguma, R., Lubega, J.T.: Web design requirements for improved web accessibility for the blind. In: Fong, J., Kwan, R, Wang, F.L. (eds.) Hybrid Learning and Education. Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci., pp. 392–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
- 3.Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web, Scientific American, pp. 35–43, (2001)Google Scholar
- 7.Chiang, M.F., Cole, R.G., Gupta, S., Kaiser, G.E., Starren, J.B.: Computer and world wide web accessibility by visually disabled patients: Problems and Solutions. Surv. of Ophthalmol., vol. 50, no.4, (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Panofsky, E.: Studies in Iconology: Humanistic themes in the art of the renaissance, pp. 5–9. Harper & Row, New York (1972)Google Scholar
- 10.Keysers, D., Renn, M., Breuel, T.M.: Improving accessibility of HTML documents by generating image-tags in a proxy. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 249–250, (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Elahi, N., Karlsen, R., Akselsen, S.: A context centric approach for semantic image annotation and retrieval, computationworld. Computation world: Future computing, service computation, cognitive, adaptive, content, patterns, pp. 66–668, (2009)Google Scholar
- 14.Lassila, O., Swick, R.: Resource description framework model and syntax specification. World Wide Web Consortium (1999).http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222. Accessed 10 Mar 2011
- 15.McGuinness, D.L., Van Harmelen, F.: Web Ontology Language Overview. World Wide Web Consortium (2004). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ Accessed 10 Mar 2011
- 16.Ruotsalo, T.: Methods and Applications for Ontology-Based Recommender Systems. Aalto University, Doctoral Diss (2010)Google Scholar
- 18.Ohler, J.: The Semantic web in education. Educause Q. 31(4), 7–9 (2008)Google Scholar