Dynamic Ontology Construction for E-Trading

  • K. AnithaKumari
  • G. SudhaSadasivam
  • T. Aruna
  • S. Christie Sajitha
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 178)

Abstract

Ontologies form the core of semantic web systems. The Semantic Web activity aims to introduce meaning to the web using ontologies. Semantic web provides the idea of having data on the web defined and linked in a way that it can be used by machines not just for display purposes but for automation, integration and reuse of data across various applications. This paper presents the construction of ontology for the E-Trading domain in two different approaches such as static and dynamic and performance analysis of both the approaches are also performed.

Keywords

Semantic Web Ontology Protégé Tool Jambalaya Jena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Caliusco, M.L.: A Semantic Definition Support Elec-tronic Business Documents in e–Colaboration. PhD thesis. UTN - F.R.S.F. Santa Fe, Argentina (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cranefield, S.: UML and the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of SWWWS 2001, The First Semantic Web Working Symposium, pp. 113–130. Stanford University, California (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Souza Baptista, C., Vasconcelos, K.F., Arruda, L.S.: On- toEditor:a Web tool for manipulating ontologies stored in data-base servers. In: 15th International workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Falbo, R.A.: Experiences in Using a Method for Build-ing Domain Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2004, pp. 474–477 (2004); International Workshop on Ontology In Action, OIA 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernandez Lopez, M.: Overview of methodologies for building ontologies. In: IJCAI 1999 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods (August 1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., FernándezLópez, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering with examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-commerce and the semantic web. Springer, London (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brusa, G., Ma, L.C.: A Process for Building a Domain Ontology: an Experience in Developing a Government Budgetary Ontology. In: Australasian Ontology Workshop (AOW 2006), Horbart, Australia (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruninger, M., Fox, M.S.: Methodology for the De-sign and Evaluation of Ontologies. In: IJCAI Workshop on Basic Ontological in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal, Canada (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gong, H., Guo, J.: Research on the Building and Reasoning of Travel Ontology. In: International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application Workshops, China. ontology development, Liverpool, UK (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park, J., Sung, K., Moon, S.: Developing Graduation Screen Ontology Based on the MethontologyApproach. In: Fourth International Conference on networked Computing and Advanced Information Management, NCM 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, D., Bench-Capon, T., Visser, P.: Methodologies for Ontology Development. In: Proc. IT&KNOWS Conference, XVIFIP World Computer Congress, Budapest (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arpirez, J.C., Corcho, O., et al.: WebODE:a scalable work-bench for ontological engineering. ACM (October 2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noy, N., McGuinness, D.: Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rector, A.L., Drummond, N., Horridge, M., Rogers, J.D., Knublauch, H., Stevens, R., Wang, H., Wroe, C.: OWL Pizzas: Practical Experience of Teaching OWL-DL: Common Errors & Common Patterns. In: Motta, E., Shadbolt, N.R., Stutt, A., Gibbins, N. (eds.) EKAW 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3257, pp. 63–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, S.-M., Guo, J.-Y.: An Approach of Domain Ontology Construction based on Resource Model and Jena. In: Third International Symposium on Information Processing, Kumming, China (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, B.: Ontology. In: Floridi, L. (ed.) BlackwellGuide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, pp. 155–166. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, M., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.: OWL Web Ontol-ogy Language Guide, W3C Recommendation 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. AnithaKumari
    • 1
  • G. SudhaSadasivam
    • 1
  • T. Aruna
    • 1
  • S. Christie Sajitha
    • 1
  1. 1.PSG TechCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations