Rough Set Model for Prediction of Trustworthy Web Services

  • Sankaranarayanan Murugan
  • Veilumuthu Ramachandran
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 178)


The main aim of this paper is to propose a rough set model for predicting the trustworthiness of Web services by the way of ranking them using the estimation of non-functional parameters of each service. The Web services are operating in a distributed environment and hence the ranking of services may not be unique and cannot be predicted precisely. The opinions of the evaluators are sometimes not neutral and quantifying the information will produce an imbalanced result. Rough sets are applied to obtain an effective and unbiased ranking of services using the information provided by the evaluators. The non-functional QoS parameters i.e. reliability, availability, security and integrity of the services are considered as conditional attributes and the reputation of the service represents the decision attribute. To obtain the significance of each QoS parameter, a set of decision rules has been formulated with conditional and decision attributes. The concepts of rough sets based approximation and cardinality are applied to compute the impact (weight) of each attribute in the given data set. Grey relational analysis is applied to normalize the data collected from the evaluators. The rank of the service is determined by computing the weight of the attributes using normalized data and hence the trustworthiness of the Web services has been evaluated.


Web services Rough Set Grey Relational Analysis QoS Trustworthy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hou, J.: Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multiple Attribute Decision Making in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Setting. Journal of Convergence Information Technology 5(10), 194–199 (2010), doi:10.4156/jcit.vol5. issue10.25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    He, M., Guo, W.: The Fuzzy Decision-Making Model Based on Rough Set of the M&A of Resource-Typed Enterprises. In: Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 3, pp. 218–223 (2007), doi:10.1109/FSKD.2007.314Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walczak, B., Massart, D.L.: Tutorial: Rough Sets Theory. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 47(1), 1–16 (1999), doi:10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00200-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liang, W.Y.: Apply Rough Set Theory into the Web Services Composition. In: 22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp. 888–895 (2008), doi: 10.1109/AINA.2008.52Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao, W., Zhang, Z.: An Email Classification Model Based on Rough Set Theory. In: International Conference on Active Media Technology, pp. 403–408 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pawlak, Z.: Rough Set Approach to Knowledge-Based Decision Support. European Journal of Operational Research 99(1), 48–57 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pawlak, Z.: Rough Set Theory and its Applications. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology 3, 7–10 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11(5), 341–356 (1982)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sankaranarayanan Murugan
    • 1
  • Veilumuthu Ramachandran
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science and EngineeringSathyabama UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Information Science and TechnologyAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations